28 Revision Rhinoplasty



Rod J. Rohrich, Jamil Ahmad, and Ira L. Savetsky


Abstract


Rhinoplasty remains one of the most challenging operations performed by plastic surgeons. The complexity lies in the ability to have a consistent and predictable aesthetic result. The unpredictability is mainly due to the interplay of manipulated internal structures and wound healing dynamics. In addition, setting realistic expectations with the patient is essential in achieving high postoperative patient satisfaction. An open rhinoplasty approach enables an accurate and in-depth evaluation and intervention. We provide a detailed analysis and discussion on why primary rhinoplasty fails and the surgical approach to prevent these failures.




28 Revision Rhinoplasty



Key Points




  • A comprehensive and systematic nasofacial analysis is critical in establishing goals and formulating a precise surgical plan for aesthetic nasal surgery.



  • Setting realistic expectations with the patient is essential for achieving high postoperative patient satisfaction.



  • Using structural support and closing dead space will result in a more consistent, predictable result while minimizing primary rhinoplasty failures.



  • An open rhinoplasty approach enables an accurate and in-depth evaluation and intervention.



28.1 Preoperative Planning



28.1.1 Nasal History and Physical Examination




  • Have the patients list their top three nasal aesthetic and/or function concerns and record them precisely.



  • Note any prior nasal trauma and operations including rhinoplasty, septal reconstruction/septoplasty, and sinus surgery and, when possible, prior operative reports should be reviewed.



  • An internal nasal examination should include assessment of the septum, turbinates, and internal and external valves.



  • Palpate the nose to assess the length of the nasal bones and strength of the lower lateral cartilages.



28.1.2 Nasofacial Proportions and Systematic Nasal Analysis: “10–7–5” Nasal Analysis (Table 28.1)




  • The front view evaluation should include 10 key areas: Facial proportions, skin type/skin thickness, symmetry/nasal deviation, bony vault width, midvault asymmetry, dorsal aesthetic lines, tip shape/tip-defining points, alar rims/base, infratip lobular projection, and periapical hypoplasia/upper lip length.






















































































    Table 28.1 Evidence-based nasal analysis: The 10–7-5 method

    Nasal view


    Analysis


    Frontal

     

    1. Facial proportions


    Height (thirds), width (fifths), symmetry


    2. Skin type/quality


    Fitzpatrick type, thin or thick, sebaceous


    3. Symmetry/nasal deviation


    Midline, dorsal deviation, C-„, reverse C-„, or S-shaped deviation


    4. Dorsal aesthetic lines


    Straight, symmetric or asymmetric, well- or ill-defined, narrow or wide


    5. Bony vault


    Narrow or wide, asymmetric, short or long nasal bones


    6. Midvault


    Narrow or wide, collapse, inverted-V, saddle deformity


    7. Nasal tip


    Ideal/bulbous/boxy/pinched, supratip, tip-defining points, infratip lobule


    8. Alar rims


    Gull-shaped, facets, notching, retraction


    9. Alar base


    Width


    10. Upper lip


    Long or short, dynamic depressor septi, upper lip crease


    Lateral

     

    1. Nasofrontal angle and radix


    Acute or obtuse, high or low radix, prominent or low nasion


    2. Nasal length, dorsum and supratip


    Length: long or short


    Dorsum: smooth, hump, scooped out Supratip: break, fullness, pollybeak, overprojected or underprojected


    3. Tip projection


    Overprojected or underprojected


    4. Tip rotation


    Overrotated or underrotated


    5. Alar–columellar relationship


    Hanging or retracted ala, hanging or retracted columella


    Maxillary or soft tissue deficiency


    6. Periapical hypoplasia


    Maxillary or soft tissue deficiency


    7. Lip–chin relationship


    Normal, overprojected or underprojected chin


    Basal

     

    1. Nasal projection


    Overprojected or underprojected, well- or ill-defined tip-defining points, columellar-to-lobule ratio


    2. Nostril


    Symmetry, long/narrow or short/wide nostril, nostril–tip ratio, concave or convex ala


    3. Columella


    Caudal septal deviation, flaring of medial crura


    4. Alar base


    Width


    5. Alar flaring

     


  • The profile view includes 7 areas: Radix height and position, dorsal convexity, nasal length, tip projection, tip rotation, alar–columellar relationship, and chin projection.



  • Use the base view to assess 5 areas: Nasal projection, nostril shape/symmetry, columella symmetry/width, alar base width, and alar rim flaring.



28.2 Operative Steps




  • We have shown the safety of ignoring prior incisions in the columella and basing the new scar location based on where the surgeon feels is ideal (Unger et al. 2013.).



  • The nose should be approached using an open technique as described in Chapter 15 Open Rhinoplasty Finesse. It is critical that dissection remains deep to the scar tissue.



  • See Video 28.1.



28.2.1 Nasal Dorsum and Midvault




  • Deformities of the nasal dorsum are commonly found in revision rhinoplasty and can not only lead to irregularities and disruption of the dorsal aesthetic lines but also lead to compromise of the internal nasal valve.



  • Inadequate support can lead to midvault collapse resulting in an aesthetically displeasing inverted-V deformity. Maximal control with a graduated approach of the dorsum is critical.



  • Use of the senior author’s “4Rs” component dorsal hump reduction is recommended when addressing this area: (1) Release the upper lateral cartilages from the septum, (2) incrementally Resect the septum proper, (3) Rasp the bony dorsum, and (4) Restore the dorsal aesthetic lines. Deformities of the nasal dorsum are commonly found and can lead to irregularities and disruption of the dorsal aesthetic lines (Fig. 28.1).



  • When sufficient upper lateral cartilage volume is present, restoration of the dorsal aesthetic lines is predictably achieved by using the senior author’s four-step approach for autospreader grafts: (1) pull-twist-turn, (2) horizontal mattress sutures, (3) percutaneous osteotomies, and (4) simple interrupted sutures.



  • Spreader grafts should be used selectively when additional midvault infrastructure is needed (Fig. 28.2a–c).



  • External nasal valve compromise is also commonly encountered in revision rhinoplasty. This area is particularly prone to late changes due to wound contraction and scarring of the soft triangles and the lack of structural support in this region.



  • Alar collapse due to misplaced alar grafts causing obstruction is commonly encountered.



  • Removal of obstructing alar grafts and replacement with appropriate structural support will open the external nasal valve and restore air flow.



  • Proper and routine placement of extended alar contour grafts in primary rhinoplasty is advocated as it helps to prevent external nasal valve collapse secondarily.

Fig. 28.1 (a–c) Component dorsum. Surgical approach to the dorsum: separation of the upper lateral cartilages from the septum. The mucoperichondrium of the dorsal septum is elevated, from caudal to cephalad, until the elevator reaches the nasal bones. (Reproduced with permission from Rohrich R, Ahmad J, eds. The Dallas Rhinoplasty and Dallas Cosmetic Surgery Dissection Guide. 1st ed. Thieme; 2018.)
Fig. 28.2 (a) Spreader grafts. Reconstitution of the dorsum: spreader grafts. Spreader grafts may be positioned at or above the plane of the dorsal septum to be visible for aesthetic indications or below it as invisible grafts for purely functional indications. (Reproduced with permission from Rohrich R, Ahmad J, eds. Secondary Rhinoplasty by the Global Masters. 1st ed. Thieme; 2016.)
(b) Spreader flaps. Reconstitution of the dorsum: Type 3: midvault restoration with spreader flap modification. The 5–0 PDS sutures are placed caudal to the upper edge of the upper lateral cartilages, thereby infolding the superior edge of the upper lateral cartilages. This serves a spreader-type function. This technique should be employed when attempting to widen the midvault. (c) Upper lateral cartilage tension spanning sutures. (Reproduced with permission from Rohrich R, Adams W, Ahmad J, et al, eds. Dallas Rhinoplasty: Nasal Surgery by the Masters. 3rd ed. Thieme; 2014.)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 20, 2021 | Posted by in Aesthetic plastic surgery | Comments Off on 28 Revision Rhinoplasty

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access