Tendon Tissue Engineering and Bioactive Suture Repair

Chapter 7 Tendon Tissue Engineering and Bioactive Suture Repair




Outline




Despite recent advances in flexor tendon repair surgery, many patients still experience poor outcomes following repair. This is often due to severe adhesion formation, which may require tenolysis procedures to improve motion. Additional causes of poor outcomes include tendon rupture or failure at the repair site, due to either suture pull-through, suture breakage, knot slippage, or gapping at the repair site.


When graft material is required, repairs are currently limited to autografts such as the palmaris longus, plantaris, and toe extensor tendons. Limitations of autograft harvesting include donor site morbidity and additional anesthesia and operative time. In cases of mutilating injuries to the hand (Figure 7-1), the demand for graft material may outstrip the autograft supply in a patient, leaving these patients without a good solution for restoring hand function.



Although synthetic graft materials such as Dacron grafts and Silastic rods have been used for tendon reconstruction, outcomes are generally poor, and the life span of these grafts tends to be short. Failure is typically due to mechanical wear or rupture of the tendon–graft interface. These synthetic materials are designed to replace tendon tissue, rather than to regenerate it. Thus, the resulting repair does not heal with tendon tissue properly and does not support the ingrowth of cells to promote biodegradation and remodeling of the implant.



Tissue Engineering


One of the earliest articles broadly defining tissue engineering was a 1993 Science article by Langer and Vacanti.1 In this article, they defined the nascent field of tissue engineering as “an interdisciplinary field that applies the principles of engineering and the life sciences toward the development of biological substitutes that restore, maintain, or improve tissue function.” They described three general strategies of tissue engineering: (1) cells or cell substitutes, (2) tissue-inducing substances such as growth factors and delivery vehicles, and (3) cell-seeded scaffolds. These principles have been applied to clinical needs in hand surgery, resulting in commercially available products including engineered skin substitutes2 and allogeneic nerve grafts.3 However, a tissue-engineered tendon is not yet available.



Tendon Biology


At their simplest, tendons can be thought of as thick collagen ropes that transmit forces from muscles to act across joints to move and stabilize them. Development of a tissue-engineered tendon requires a much deeper understanding. The mechanical properties of tendons crucial to their proper functioning rely not only on the structure and organization of its major collagen constituents but also on the other extracellular matrix components. At steady state, tendons are relatively hypocellular and have low metabolic demands. During times of injury and healing, cells and their nutritional pathways play a critical role, and their activity is a major determinant of tendon healing.



Structure and Anatomy


Collagen is the basic structural unit of tendons.4,5 It is organized into a hierarchical structure of progressively larger and more organized subunits to form the crimped or sinusoidal pattern visible by light microscopy.


While collagen is the major constituent of tendons, proteoglycans are critical to the biological and mechanical functioning of tendons.6 Proteoglycans promote hydration through hydrophilic subunits and mediate interactions between structural units of the tendon, which are important determinants of the viscoelastic properties of tendons. Another important function of proteoglycans is their role in promoting cell signaling to mediate growth, proliferation, and migration.


Synovial sheaths around tendons are found in areas subjected to mechanical stress in which efficient gliding is mediated by synovial lubrication. Examples of tendons of the hand with intrasynovial portions include the flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor digitorum profundus tendons. These tendons have an intrasynovial region in their more distal portions within the hand and an extrasynovial region in their more proximal portions. In addition to assisting with gliding in areas of high mechanical stress, the synovial sheath also provides nutrition by diffusion through synovial fluid. Extrasynovial tendons are covered by the paratenon, a loose connective tissue that carries the blood supply. This distinction is important because although overall outcomes are generally unsatisfactory with injuries to intrasynovial tendons and graft reconstruction, particularly in zone 2, better outcomes are achieved when reconstruction is performed with intrasynovial autografts rather than extrasynovial autografts.


Brockis and others made early observations about the vascular supply to flexor tendons.7 They observed that tendons receive their blood supply through the musculotendinous junction, the paratenon surrounding the tendon in the extrasynovial region, the vincula within the intrasynovial region, and the osteotendinous insertion. In addition to vascular nutrition, the intrasynovial portion of the tendon receives nutrition by diffusion through the synovial fluid.8,9





Extrinsic Versus Intrinsic Healing


It was originally thought that tendons must heal by an extrinsic process in which ingrowth of new cells occurred through vascularized adhesions to surrounding tissue.11 It was later demonstrated that intrasynovial tendons could heal by a process mediated by cells intrinsic to the tendon.12,13 This suggested that adhesion formation might not be necessary for tendon healing if cells within the damaged tendon are available to mediate repair.



Tendon Tissue Engineering


Tissue engineering a tendon requires an understanding of the basic science of tendon healing and tendon function. This knowledge can then be applied to designing and choosing the components of a tissue-engineered tendon, which can include cells, a scaffold, growth factors, and mechanical manipulation (Figure 7-2), some or all of which can be used to create the final tissue-engineered product.




Cells


As the machinery responsible for tissue repair and maintenance, cells are a necessary component of a tissue-engineered construct in order to achieve functional restoration of the tendon. Despite this clear goal of a tissue-engineered construct, the steps necessary to achieve this goal remain uncertain. Questions researchers continue to face include determining the appropriate cell type and cell source and determining the site of cell seeding.



Cell Type and Cell Source


Selection of the cell type and cell source for seeding of the tendon construct is an important decision that must consider (1) the ease of harvest of the chosen cell type without inflicting collateral morbidity at the donor site, (2) the ability to culture and expand the cells in vitro, and (3) whether the chosen cells will achieve functional restoration of the tendon. Cell types that have been considered include tenocytes, dermal fibroblasts, and mesenchymal stem cells.


Tenocytes are the predominant cell type of native tendon. Thus, they should be capable of restoring function of a tissue-engineered tendon construct. In a study using unwoven polyglycolic acid scaffolds seeded with hen tenocytes, Cao and colleagues demonstrated that tenocyte-seeded scaffolds resembled native tendons in histologic structure, collagen arrangement, and breaking strength.14 However, tenocytes may not be a practical source of cells because autologous tendon harvest required for their isolation results in donor site morbidity. They also expand very slowly in culture, which may make them further impractical due to a lengthy in vitro expansion time following cell isolation and before seeding of the tendon construct.


Human dermal fibroblasts are another terminally differentiated cell type that closely resembles tenocytes and have been widely considered as a candidate cell line for tendon tissue engineering. Like tenocytes, dermal fibroblasts are derived from the mesoderm, have similar morphology, and have similar extracellular matrix production capacity. Harvest of autologous dermal fibroblasts through a simple skin biopsy would cause minimal morbidity or expense, which is a notable advantage over tenocytes, and they are easily and rapidly expanded in culture. In a study comparing human tenocytes and human dermal fibroblasts, each cell type was isolated and grown separately on a polyglycolic acid scaffold.15 The authors found no difference in a number of outcome measurements comparing tenocyte-seeded and dermal fibroblast–seeded tendon constructs, including gross structure, histology, collagen deposition, collagen fibril diameter, and construct strength. These results suggest that dermal fibroblasts may be a suitable substitute for tenocytes, which will also avoid the problems with using autologous tenocytes.


Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a multipotent cell line present in adult bone marrow and adipose tissue that may be cultured as undifferentiated cells or driven to differentiate into mesenchymal lineages including tenocytes, osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes.16 Although harvest of MSCs from bone marrow is invasive, provides low yields, and requires time consuming and expensive in vitro expansion in culture, it does not carry the donor site morbidity of tenocyte harvest. Several groups have demonstrated improved tendon strength, remodeling, and tissue formation when seeded with bone marrow–derived MSCs.1719

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 5, 2016 | Posted by in Hand surgery | Comments Off on Tendon Tissue Engineering and Bioactive Suture Repair

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access