Skin Resurfacing with Ablative Lasers

29 Skin Resurfacing with Ablative Lasers



Ablative laser resurfacing is one of the most effective therapies available for wrinkle reduction. This is an aggressive method of skin resurfacing whereby water in the skin is heated and vaporized by laser energy, causing a controlled injury to the epidermis and dermis. It is most commonly performed using either carbon dioxide (CO2) or erbium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) lasers. Traditional ablative laser resurfacing deeply penetrates the skin (up to 300 µm), and because the epidermis is fully ablated, it is associated with prolonged recovery times, and may have serious complications of infection, hypopigmentation, and scarring1 and, hence, is rarely performed today. Less aggressive superficial ablative treatments (ranging in depth from 20 to 50 µm) are still commonly performed, particularly for reduction of dyschromia and mild wrinkles.2 Superficial ablative laser resurfacing is also referred to as a laser peel.


In 2004, a novel method of fractional resurfacing, which involves treating only a portion or “fraction” of the skin, was introduced.3 Fractional devices deliver laser energy to the skin in microscopic columns, also called microthermal zones. This delivery method allows for very deep penetration in the skin (up to 1.5 µm). Figure 29-1 shows a comparison between deep fractional microthermal zones and “conventional” horizontal plane resurfacing.



The untreated adjacent tissue between microthermal zones serves as a reservoir of regenerative cells that migrate into the treatment area and facilitate rapid wound healing. Fractional ablative resurfacing has been shown to effectively reduce wrinkles and improve dyschromia in photoaged skin and has the advantages of reduced recovery time and reduced risks compared to conventional ablative laser resurfacing.46



Laser Principles


Ablative lasers achieve wrinkle reduction through the use of water as the target chromophore to heat and vaporize tissue. The two main laser wavelengths used for ablative resurfacing, 2940 nm (Er:YAG) and 10,600 nm (carbon dioxide), are well absorbed by water. A third, less frequently used wavelength is 2790 nm (yttrium scandium gallium garnet or YSGG). Figure 29-2 shows the water absorption spectrum and these three ablative resurfacing lasers. Note that the erbium 2940 nm wavelength is at a water absorption peak and is approximately 15 times more highly absorbed by water than CO2.



Absorbed laser energy has two main effects on tissue: (1) removal of tissue, called ablation, and (2) heat transference to surrounding tissue, called coagulation. Coagulation clinically results in tissue tightening. A controlled amount of coagulation with treatments is, therefore, desirable but too much thermal injury can be associated with complications such as hypopigmentation and scarring. Due to a greater absorption by water, Er:YAG lasers ablate tissue at lower fluences (approximately 1 J/cm2), compared to CO2 lasers, which require higher fluences to achieve similar ablation (approximately 5 J/cm2). Er:YAG lasers, therefore, cause less thermal damage to the surrounding tissues and have smaller zones of coagulation than CO2 lasers. Figure 29-3 shows the zones of coagulation around a region of ablation with a CO2 versus an erbium laser. The amount of ablation and coagulation is controlled by laser fluence and pulse width (see Chapter 19, Aesthetic Principles and Consultation, for a discussion of laser parameters). Ablation is most effectively achieved with short pulse widths and high fluences, whereas coagulation is achieved with longer pulse widths and lower fluences (Figure 29-4). By varying these two parameters, ablative laser devices can independently control the amounts of ablation and coagulation achieved.




Laser fluence is also a major determinant of the depth of injury with fractional ablative devices, where higher fluences penetrate deeper. Density settings control the percentage of skin that is treated. More aggressive fractional ablative treatments are, therefore, achieved with high fluences and high density parameters. Some fractional devices utilize scanners and computer software to “randomly” deliver pulses within a set pattern so that the pulses are not adjacent to one another. Changing the energy delivery pattern from sequential to nonadjacent pulses allows for high energies to be delivered without the effects of bulk heating.7 This is particularly useful with CO2 devices which cause greater thermal injury.


In summary, fractional ablative laser devices have variable fluences, spot sizes, spot densities, and pulse widths, all of which affect the depth of penetration as well as the degree of ablation and coagulation achieved.8 Because these devices are still relatively new, clinical correlation is required to determine how these different parameters impact results, downtime, and side effects.



Patient Selection


Fitzpatrick skin type classification is an important factor in assessing patients for laser resurfacing (see Chapter 19, Aesthetic Principles and Consultation, for skin type classification). The ideal patient has a fair complexion (Fitzpatrick types I through III) with lesions responsive to laser ablation (see the Indications section below). Patients with darker complexions (Fitzpatrick types IV and V) may be treated as well, but must be informed about their higher risk for pigmentary complications and the need for more cautious treatment parameters, which may limit results. Although patients with Fitzpatrick skin type V may be candidates, in reality these patients rarely present with the facial aging signs that patients with lighter skin types complain of, and one rarely encounters such a patient seeking facial resurfacing. It is advisable for providers getting started with fractional ablative resurfacing to limit treatments to lighter skin types (I through III).


It is also very important that patients have realistic expectations regarding results. Fractional ablative laser resurfacing can generally improve wrinkles, however, significant skin laxity and sagging jowls may be better addressed with surgery, such as a facelift. Patients must fully understand the ablative laser postoperative recovery course and agree to comply with the postprocedure instructions. Re-epithelialization following fractional ablative laser treatments typically requires 5 to 7 days. Patients must be able to tolerate this recovery period, and anticipated professional and social obligations should be considered with patient selection and timing of the procedure.


Patients often seek laser resurfacing to improve wrinkles near the lower eyelids and significant improvements may be achieved in this area. However, there are certain contraindications to treatment in this area including prior lower blepharoplasty and poor lower eyelid skin elasticity.




Alternative Therapies


Skin resurfacing can also be accomplished by mechanical exfoliation procedures such as microdermabrasion and chemical peeling treatments which typically penetrate to the epidermis or upper reticular dermis (see Chapter 22, Chemical Peels and Chapter 23, Microdermabrasion). Dermabrasion is a mechanical, “cold steel” method of removing epidermis, papillary, or upper reticular dermis. Dermabrasion and chemical peeling have the advantage of being less expensive than laser resurfacing. However, extensive hands-on experience in a preceptor environment is required in order to learn the art of dermabrasion.11









Procedure Preparation


The following guidelines are based on fractional ablative laser resurfacing treatments for Fitzpatrick skin types I through III. Manufacturer guidelines for the specific device used should be followed at the time of treatment.







Fractional Ablative Laser Resurfacing: Steps and Principles


The following guidelines are based on treatments of the full face using a fractional ablative erbium 2940 nm laser (Hoya ConBio DermaSculpt™), which is indicated for Fitzpatrick skin types I through III. Manufacturer guidelines for the specific device used should be followed at the time of treatment.




Planning and Designing


Ablative laser resurfacing may be performed to a region of the face or to the entire face. Figure 29-5 shows three of the most commonly treated facial aesthetic subunits (modified from Gonzales-Ulloa16). The periocular subunit is bounded inferiorly by the crest of the zygoma and superiorly by the orbital rim. The upper lip subunit

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 12, 2016 | Posted by in General Surgery | Comments Off on Skin Resurfacing with Ablative Lasers

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access