Blepharoplasty

8 Blepharoplasty






Introduction


Properly performed aesthetic periorbital surgery is one of the most rejuvenating of all facial surgeries performed today. Properly conceived and executed, it proves a tremendous source of joy for both surgeon and patient. Done poorly, it can lead to a lifetime of disfigurement and functional problems for the patient, sleepless nights for the surgeon, and dissatisfaction for both participants. The problem is magnified because aesthetic periorbital surgical procedures are among the most commonly performed in plastic surgery practices.


Traditional methods of aesthetic periorbital surgery often produce suboptimal results. A departure from the standard techniques of the past is recommended. Most plastic surgeons know there is a better way, and those who persist with traditional techniques may soon be deviating from a new standard of surgical care. It is this new standard that is advocated in this chapter. When they are understood and adopted, these new standards eliminate the classic complications and risks associated with traditional techniques.


Instead of the common practice of excising precious upper and, to a somewhat lesser degree, lower eyelid tissue, it is preferable to focus on restoration of attractive, youthful anatomy. To expect that the simple removal of tissue will always result in beautiful or youthful eyes is unrealistic because this may not fully correct the aging eye deformity.


One should first conceptualize the desired outcome, then select and execute procedures accurately designed to achieve those specific goals. For this task to be accomplished, several important principles are advocated (Box 8.1). Enthusiastically embraced, this approach is likely to result in excellent aesthetic quality of surgical outcomes.




History


As far back as the 10th and 11th centuries, Arabian surgeons, Avicenna and Ibn Rashid, described the significance of excess skin folds in impairing eyesight.1 Even at an early date, surgeons had excised upper eyelid skin to improve vision. Texts published in the 18th and 19th centuries were the first to describe and illustrate the upper eyelid aging deformities. The term, blepharoplasty, was coined by Von Graefe in 1818 to describe reconstructive procedures employed following oncologic excisions. Several European surgeons developed reconstructive techniques for eyelid defects in the latter half of the 19th century. Graefe and Mackenzie would be credited with applying these reconstructive principles and publishing the first, reproducible cases of upper blepharoplasty. The concepts of herniated orbital fat pads were described shortly thereafter by Sichel and Bourguet, respectively. Orbital fat pads were originally considered to be “circumscribed tumors” of fat that made movement of the upper lid more difficult. It was a rare condition found “most often in children”. Cosmetic blepharoplasty entered a period of rapid growth and research in the 1920–1930s. Contributions were made that described nearly 13 different approaches and closure methods. Recent variations in technique appear to have a basis in these early techniques, which have cycled in popularity over the last decade.



Basic science/disease process



Essential and dynamic anatomy


It is an absolute necessity that the surgeon understands the essential and dynamic periorbital anatomy to effect superior aesthetic and functional surgical results. No surgeon should perform surgery without fully understanding the aesthetic and functional consequences of the choices.25




Lateral retinaculum


Anchored to the lateral orbit is a labyrinth of connective tissues that are crucial to maintenance of the integrity, position, and function of the globe and periorbital. Understanding how to effectively restore these structures is key to periocular rejuvenation by canthopexy. These structures, known as the lateral retinaculum, coalesce at the lateral orbit and support the globe and eyelids like a hammock (Fig. 8.2).810 The lateral retinaculum consists of the lateral canthal tendon, tarsal strap, lateral horn of the levator aponeurosis, the Lockwood suspensory ligament, Whitnall’s ligament, and check ligaments of the lateral rectus muscle. They converge and insert securely into the thickened periosteum overlying the Whitnall tubercle. Controversy exists surrounding the naming of the components of the lateral canthal tendon. Recent cadaveric dissections suggest that the lateral canthal tendon has dual insertions. A superficial component is continuous with the orbicularis oculi fascia and attaches to the lateral orbital rim and deep temporal fascia by means of the lateral orbital thickening. A deep component connects directly to the Whitnall tubercle is classically known as the lateral canthal tendon (Fig. 8.3).11




In addition, the tarsal strap is a distinct anatomic structure that inserts into the tarsus medial and inferior to the lateral canthal tendon.12 In contrast to the canthal tendon, the thick tarsal strap is relatively resistant to laxity changes seen with aging. The tarsal strap attaches approximately 3 mm inferiorly and 1 mm posteriorly to the deep lateral canthal tendon, approximately 4–5 mm from the anterior orbital rim. It shortens in response to lid laxity, benefiting from release during surgery to help achieve a long-lasting restoration or elevation canthopexy (Fig. 8.4). Adequate release of the tarsal strap permits a tension-free canthopexy, minimizing the downward tethering force of this fibrous condensation. This release along with a superior reattachment of the lateral canthal tendon is key to a successful canthopexy.





Forehead and temporal region


The forehead and brow consist of four layers: skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle, and galea. There are four distinct brow muscles: frontalis, procerus, corrugator superciliaris, and orbicularis oculi (Fig. 8.6). The frontalis muscle inserts predominately into the medial half or two-thirds of the eyebrow (Fig. 8.7), allowing the lateral brow to drop hopelessly ptotic from aging, while the medial brow responds to frontalis activation and elevates, often excessively in its drive to clear the lateral overhand. Constant contraction of the frontalis will give the appearance of deep horizontal creases in the forehead (Fig. 8.8).3





The vertically oriented procerus is a medial muscle, often continuous with the frontalis, arising from the nasal bones and inserting into the subcutaneous tissue of the glabellar region. It pulls the medial brow inferiorly and contributes to the horizontal wrinkles at the root of the nose. More commonly, these wrinkles result from brow ptosis and correct spontaneously with brow elevation.


The obliquely oriented corrugators muscle arises from the frontal bone and inserts into the brow tissue laterally, with some extensions into orbicularis and frontalis musculature, forming vertical glabellar furrows during contraction. Wrinkles from procerus and corrugators contraction can worsen significantly after upper lid tissue excision as a result of the frontalis muscle’s relaxing after being relieved of the need to clear the obstructing lid skin.14




Upper eyelid


The orbital septum originates superiorly at the arcus and forms the anterior border of the orbit. It joins with the levator aponeurosis, just superior to the tarsus. The sling formed by the union of these two structures houses the orbital fat.


The levator palpebrae superioris muscle originates above the annulus of Zinn. It extends anteriorly for 40 mm before becoming a tendinous aponeurosis below Whitnall’s ligament.7,16 The aponeurosis fans out medially and laterally to attach to the orbital retinacula. The aponeurosis fuses with the orbital septum above the superior border of the tarsus and at the caudal extent of the sling, sending fibrous strands to the dermis to form the lid crease. Extensions of the aponeurosis finally insert into the anterior and inferior tarsus. As the levator aponeurosis undergoes senile attenuation, the lid crease rises into the superior orbit from its remaining dermal attachments while the lid margin drops.


Müller’s muscle, or the supratarsal muscle, originates on the deep surface of the levator near the point where the muscle becomes aponeurotic and inserts into the superior tarsus. Dehiscence of the attachment of the levator aponeurosis to the tarsus results in an acquired ptosis only after the Müller’s muscle attenuates and loses its integrity.14


In the Asian eyelid, fusion of the levator and septum commonly occurs at a lower level, allowing the sling and fat to descend farther into the lid.15,16 This lower descent of fat creates the characteristic fullness of their upper eyelid. In addition, the aponeurotic fibers form a weaker attachment to the dermis, resulting in a less distinct lid fold (Fig. 8.10).


image

Fig. 8.10 The anatomic variations in the upper eyelid displayed by different ethnic groups and the changes associated with senescence within each group allow for a convergence of anatomy. (A) The occidental upper eyelid has levator extensions inserting onto the skin surface to define a lid-fold that averages 6–8 mm above the lid margin. The position of the levator-skin linkage and the anteroposterior relationship of the preaponeurotic fat determine lid-fold height and degree of sulcus concavity or convexity (as shown on the right half of each anatomic depiction). (B) In the case of levator dehiscence from the tarsal plate, the upper lid crease is displaced superiorly. The orbital septum and preaponeurotic fat linked to the levator are displaced superiorly and posteriorly. These anatomic changes create a high lid crease, a deep superior sulcus, and eyelid ptosis. (C) In the aging eyelid, the septum becomes attenuated and stretches. The septal extension loosens, and this allows orbital fat to prolapsed forward and slide over the levator into an anterior and inferior position. Clinically, this results in an inferior displacement of the levator skin attachments and a low and anterior position of the preaponeurotic fat pad. (D) The youthful Asian eyelid anatomically resembles the senescent upper lid with a low levator skin zone of adhesion and inferior and anteriorly located preaponeurotic fat. The characteristic, but variable, low eyelid crease and convex upper eyelid and sulcus are classic.


(Adapted from Spinelli HM. Atlas of Aesthetic Eyelid and Periocular Surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004:59.)




Lower eyelid


The anatomy of the lower eyelid is somewhat analogous to that of the upper eyelid. The retractors of the lower lid, the capsulopalpebral fascia, correspond to the levator above. The capsulopalpebral head splits to surround and fuse with the sheath of the inferior oblique muscle. The two heads fuse to form the Lockwood suspensory ligament, which is analogous to Whitnall’s ligament. The capsulopalpebral fascia fuses with the orbital septum 5 mm below the tarsal border and then inserts into the anterior and inferior surface of the tarsus.18 The inferior tarsal muscle is analogous to Muller’s muscle of the upper eyelid and also arises from the sheath of the inferior rectus muscle. It runs anteriorly above the inferior oblique muscle and also attaches to the inferior tarsal border.


The combination of the orbital septum, orbicularis, and skin of the lower lid acts as the anterior barrier of the orbital fat. As these connective tissue properties relax, the orbital fat is allowed to herniate forward, forming an unpleasing, full lower eyelid. This relative loss of orbital volume leads to a commensurate, progressive hollowing of the upper lid as upper eyelid fat recesses.19


The capsulopalpebral fascia and its overlying conjunctiva form the posterior border of the lower orbital fat. Transection of the capsulopalpebral fascia during lower lid procedures, particularly transconjunctival blepharoplasty, releases the retractors of the lower eyelid, which can reduce downward traction and allow the position of the lower lid margin to rise.



Retaining ligaments


A network of ligaments serves as a scaffold for the skin and subcutaneous tissue surrounding the orbit. The orbital retaining ligament directly attaches the orbicularis at the junction of its orbital and preseptal components to the periosteum of the orbital rim and, consequently, separates the prezygomatic space from the preseptal space. This ligament is continuous with the lateral orbital thickening, which inserts onto the lateral orbital rim and deep temporal fascia. It also has attachments to the superficial lateral canthal tendon (Figs 8.3, 8.12, 8.13).20 Attenuation of these ligaments permit descent of orbital fat onto the cheek. A midfacelift must release these ligaments to achieve a supported, lasting lift.21






Innervation: trigeminal nerve and facial nerve


The trigeminal nerve along with its branches provides sensory innervations to the periorbital region (Fig. 8.15). The ophthalmic division enters the orbit and divides into the frontal, nasociliary, and lacrimal nerves. The terminal branch of the nasociliary nerve, the infratrochlear nerve, supplies the medial conjunctiva, and lacrimal sac. The lacrimal nerve supplies the lateral conjunctiva and skin of the lateral upper eyelid. The frontal nerve, the largest branch, divides into the supraorbital and supratrochlear branches. The supraorbital nerve exits through either a notch or a foramen and provides sensory innervations to the skin and conjunctiva of the upper eyelid and the scalp. The supratrochlear nerve innervates the skin of the glabella, forehead, medial upper eyelid, and medial conjunctiva. A well-placed supraorbital block will anesthetize most of the upper lid and the central precoronal scalp.6,14,23



The maxillary division exits the orbit through one to three infraorbital foramina. It provides sensation to the skin of the nose, the lower eyelids, and the upper lid. Dissection is necessary lateral to the infraorbital nerve for successful midface-lifting and around the nerve for placement of tear trough implants.


The facial nerve exits the stylomastoid foramen and divides in the substance of the parotid gland into the superior temporofacial and inferior cervicofacial branches (Fig. 8.16). The temporofacial nerve divides into the frontal, zygomatic, and buccal nerves; the cervicofacial nerve divides into the buccal, mandibular, and cervical nerves. There are significant variations in the branching of the facial nerve, which is responsible for facial expression. Innervation of facial muscles occurs on their deep surfaces. Interruption of the branches to the orbicularis muscle from the periorbital surgery or facial surgery may result in atonicity due to partial denervation of the orbicularis with loss of lid tone or anomalous reinnervation and possibly undesirable eyelid twitching.15



The frontal branch of the facial nerve courses immediately above and attached to the periosteum of the zygomatic bone. It then courses medially approximately 2 cm above the superior orbital rim to innervate the frontalis, corrugators, and procerus muscles from their deep surface. A separate branch travels along the inferior border of the zygoma to innervate the inferior component of orbicularis oculi.24 The surgeon should take great care when operating in this area to avoid damaging this nerve during endoscopic and open brow lifts.



Youthful, beautiful eyes


The characteristics of youthful, beautiful eyes differ from one population to another but generalizations are possible and provide a needed reference to judge the success of various surgical maneuvers. Attractive, youthful eyes are bright eyes. Bright eyes have globes framed in generously sized horizontal apertures (from medial and lateral), often accentuated by a slight upward tilt of the intercanthal axis (Fig. 8.17). The aperture length should span most of the distance between the orbital rims. In a relaxed forward gaze, the vertical height of the aperture should expose at least three-quarters of the cornea with the upper lid extending down at least 1.5 mm below the upper limbus (the upper margin of the cornea) but no more than 3 mm. The lower lid ideally covers 0.5 mm of the lower limbus but no more than 1.5 mm.4,15



In the upper lid, there should be a well-defined lid crease lying above the lid margin with lid skin under slight stretch, slightly wider laterally. Ideally, the actual pretarsal skin visualized on relaxed forward gaze ranges from 3 to 6 mm in European ethnicities. The Asian lid crease is generally 2–3 mm lower, with the distance from lid margin diminishing as the crease moves toward the inner canthus. Patients of Indo-European and African decent show 1 to 2 mm lower than European ethnicities. The ratio of distance from the lower edge of the eyebrow (at the center of the globe) to the open lid margin to the visualized pretarsal skin should never be less than 3–1 (Fig. 8.1), preferably more.


Scleral show is the appearance of white sclera below the lower border of the cornea and above the lower eyelid margin. In general, sclera show is contradictory to optimal aesthetics and may be perceived as a sign of aging, previous blepharoplasty, or orbital disease (e.g., thyroid disease). More than 0.5 mm of sclera show beneath the cornea on direct forward gaze begins to confer a sad or melancholy aura to one’s appearance. However, in some youthful persons, the largeness of these apertures gives dramatic emphasis to the eyes and may be considered a strong and positive feature.


The intercanthal axis is normally tilted slightly upward (from medial to lateral) in most populations. Exaggerated tilts are encountered in some Asian, Indo-European and African-American populations. Such upward tilt of the lateral canthal axis may give the eye a youthful appearance, which is aesthetically pleasing in any ethnic group. The lower lid that droops in its lateral aspect and the eye with a downward tilt generally convey to the viewer an aging, ill-health distortion or unattractiveness.25



Etiology of aging


In the upper lid, excessive skin due to loss of elasticity and sun damage is one of the major causes of an aged appearance in the periorbital area. If there is an excess of skin that hangs over the lid or the upper eyelid appears to have multiple folds, it is difficult to have a rejuvenated appearance with cosmetics alone. In addition to relaxed skin changes, excessive fat herniation can cause bulging, resulting in a heavy appearance to the upper lid area. Although this fat is normal orbital fat, it appears to be protruding outward because of the laxity of the orbital septum, which holds the fat in place. Theoretically, replacement of the fat into a position that maintains a normal level of fat in the orbital area seems an optimal solution. However, this is not easily accomplished and may result in complications that are difficult to correct. Therefore, the skin and fat that seem to be in apparent excess should be treated accordingly.


The etiology of aging changes in the lower lids is similar in some ways but quite different in others. Aging changes include relaxation of the tarsal margin with scleral show, rhytides of the lower lid, herniated fat pads resulting in bulging in one or all of the three fat pocket areas, and hollowing of the nasojugal groove and lateral orbital rim areas. Hollowing of the nasojugal groove area appears as dark circles under the eyes, mostly because of lighting and the shadowing that result from this defect (Fig. 8.18).26 It is clear that evaluation of all aspects of aging changes in the lids is important so the surgeon can plan the most effective operative procedure.




Diagnosis/patient presentation



Evaluation basics


The first essential step is to look at the patient carefully, thoroughly, and critically. The surgeon should be seated directly in front of the prospective patient with the patient’s eyes at his or her eye level. Note the general impression and feeling generated from looking at this person (Fig. 8.19).



One should also look for areas of symmetry or asymmetry. Notice the shape of the eye; the prominence or asymmetry of the globes; and evidence of exposure, dryness, or injection of vessels. Look for evidence of decreased tone and dropped posture of the lower lids. What is the posture of the upper lid? Are the upper lids symmetric? Is there lid ptosis? At what level does the upper lid traverse the globe? What levels do the upper and lower lids sit in relation to the limbus?


Next, have the patient relax the brow and close the eyes. Do the lids close? Then ask the patient to open the eyes. Is it necessary to raise the brows to effect comfortable forward vision? Does the corrugator frown increase in prominence with the eyes closed and the forehead relaxed? Is there transverse brow wrinkling? Is one brow lower? Which one and how much? Is there a prominent frown?


Assess the lower lid tone by pulling the lid away from the globe and releasing, making sure the patient does not blink (modified snap test). Does each lid spring back immediately, reluctantly, or not at all? Is it held against the globe by only the tear seal? Most people presenting for blepharoplasty have a significant decrease in their lower lid tone, often asymmetric.


What, if anything, would improve the aesthetic appearance of the eyes and periorbital region? Are there festoons or deep grooves (i.e., nasojugal grooves or tear trough deformities)? Is there excess skin, muscle, or fat? Quantitate any excess soft tissue on a simple eye diagram. Does restoration of lateral canthal posture correct the illusion of excess skin on the lower eyelid? Does it diminish it? Does the orbital septum appear to be excessively relaxed? Note the tilt of the intercanthal axis or lack thereof.


The “four-finger lift” is performed by encircling the outer orbit with the tips of the index, middle, ring and little fingers on one hand. With the index and middle fingers above the lateral brow, place the ring finger lateral to the canthus and little finger beneath the lateral canthus just lateral to the malar prominence. Gently move the four fingers posteriorly and superiorly to lift the lateral brow, canthus, and cheek. If this test restores youthfulness and attractiveness, a canthopexy, brow lift, and midfacelift may be beneficial.



Medical and ophthalmic history


A thorough history and physical examination should be performed before surgery (Box 8.2). In addition, an adequate eye history encourages positive outcomes and reduces eye complications.



Contact lens wear poses particular risks when eyelid surgery is performed. The natural progression of aging dries the eyes out, and long-term contact lens wearing hastens this process considerably. Traditional blepharoplasty techniques consistently produce vertical dystopia with increased scleral exposure, making the lens wear difficult if not dangerous. Ptosis and canthopexy surgery may alter the corneal curvature and require that contacts be refitted. The patient should discontinue contact lens wear in the perioperative period to allow healing without the need to manipulate the eyelids. Levator dehiscence or attenuation commonly accompanies long-term hard contact lens wear, caused by the mechanical stresses posteriorly from the rigid lens rubbing against the posterior lamella of the lid.27


The same population that seeks aesthetic surgery also gravitates toward refractive surgery, such as LASIK (laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis). A history of such surgery is necessary information because periorbital surgery particularly canthopexies and levator surgery, can affect the refractive characteristics, cause mechanical irritation of the conjunctiva and cornea, or affect the corneal flap.28

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 21, 2016 | Posted by in General Surgery | Comments Off on Blepharoplasty

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access