Flexor Tendon Repairs with Novel Sutures and Devices

Chapter 18 Flexor Tendon Repairs with Novel Sutures and Devices



A Mantero’s Technique for Tendon Repair




Outline




Flexor tendon surgery has made much progress since the 1970s due to accrued knowledge of the biology of tendon tissue repair and great improvement in suture techniques and postoperative mobilization concepts. However, tendon repair in zone 2 still is a problem due to the high risk of adherence and consequent limitation of range of active motion, even when early postoperative protected motion is adopted.


The pull-out technique was described by Bunnell in the beginning of the 20th century for tendon repair. Mantero and colleagues13 started using the technique in 1973 in association with immediate postoperative active motion. With this regimen, the occurrence of tendon adherence and an hypertrophic cutaneous scar with consequent acquired and permanent deformity and stiffness of the joints was remarkably decreased.



Indications


Any clean-cut injury of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon in zone 2 or the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon in zone 2 can be repaired with this technique. This method is also indicated for FDP tendon injuries in proximal zone 1, where direct end-to-end tendon repair is necessary.1,46 However, we do not use this method in the case of complex trauma (e.g., amputation or tendon injury associated with exposed fracture), because early motion is not possible, and the button on the top of the finger carries a risk of causing ischemia in situations in which digital circulation is already poor.


When both the FDS and FDP tendons are injured, the FDS tendon can be repaired with any end-to-end repair method in association with FDP repair by our method.



Surgical Techniques


Under regional anaesthesia, two cut tendon ends are exposed through a Bruner’s skin incision. A needle (size: 20G) used for spinal anesthesia is inserted from the fingertip and passed through the distal FDP tendon stump, from distal to proximal. Then, a 2-0 nylon thread is passed in the proximal tendon stump for 1 to 1.5 cm from the cut creating an Ω-shaped loop. The needle is then cut and the two ends of the suture are passed in the distal tendon stump by the previously inserted needle. The thread is pulled out from the tip of the finger and its two ends are secured over a mother-of-pearl button with multiple knots (Figures 18[A]-1 to 18[A]-6). For all repairs, ensuring correct coaptation of the two tendon ends with good tension is very important and depends on the surgeon’s experience. A running suture with 4-0 suture is added to tighten the tendon edges. Previously, we used a 4-0 Prolene suture and noted some foreign body reactions caused by sutures during long-term follow-up, and suture remnants had to be removed. We prefer to use absorbable (such as PDS) sutures presently.








Tendons cut distal to the A2 pulley (in zones 2A and 2B) can be more easily repaired with this method, because the distal tendon is shorter and has fewer constrictive pulleys. Therefore, it is easier to insert the needle from the fingertip through the entire distal tendon stump. For tendons cut at or proximal to the A2 pulley, the needle will pierce a greater length of the distal tendon stump with both DIP and PIP joints slightly flexed. After piercing, the internal guide of a spinal needle is retracted so that the passage of the 2-0 nylon thread is allowed. We prefer to use two different passages through the tendon stump for the thread; it ensures greater tightness of the system as the suture tension is more evenly spread along all parts of the tendon during motion.


Whenever possible, the pulley system is respected. When the A2 or A3 pulley is partially or totally damaged or when the pulleys must be partially incised to avoid any impingement of the tendon repair site on the edge of the pulley, these pulleys are not repaired. When more pulleys are injured, reconstruction is strongly recommended, especially for A2 and A4 pulleys, to avoid tendon bowstringing. We prefer to use a flap of extensor retinaculum (Lister technique) or one of the FDS tendon slips (when the FDS tendon is not repaired), sutured to the pulley remnants. A suction drain is placed and the skin is sutured with absorbable sutures. The drain is removed 1 day later, and a thinner dressing is made so that a wider range of active digital motion is allowed.



Postoperative Care


Immediate active motion is the keystone to success with this technique and it has to start as soon as possible.14 In particular, full extension of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint must be achieved in the first few days after surgery. On the first day, the dressing is reduced and the patient can start active digital motion with the wrist in a protected position (wrist in flexion). Daily homework is given to the patient, so that he or she can be autonomous, not only in moving but also in cleaning and renewing the dressings if necessary. One week later, the wound is checked and any remaining swelling is controlled. If possible, a smaller dressing is placed to allow a wider range of motion. The range of active digital flexion is increased gradually (Figure 18[A]-7). At about 21 days, it is important to observe whether there are any early clinical signs of block of tendon gliding or joint motion. If nothing abnormal is found, more vigorous and full active digital flexion exercises are performed.



The patient returns every 6 to 8 days to have the dressing changed and for a wound check. In more recent years, we have preferred to use absorbable sutures for skin closure to avoid the need for removal of suture stitches, which can be painful or quite unpleasant, especially for young patients. From 30 to 35 days after surgery, the pull-out suture is cut and the button is removed. The scab on the tip of the finger, where the button has created a small bedsore, will fall off within 2 to 3 days with daily antiseptic cleaning. A rehabilitation program is started after pull-out removal, with progressive strengthening active digital flexion from 8 weeks. The average time to return to work is 10 weeks after injury.



Outcomes


We conducted two studies on patients who were treated with the pull-out technique. Both studies contained only a portion of the patients who were treated in this period. The patients included in the two studies were those living in close proximity to our city, so they could come to our department for regular follow-up. In the first study, we followed 46 patients with injuries to 46 FDP or FPL tendons in zone 2 treated with this method between 2005 and 2008. At postoperative weeks 3, 6, and 12, we evaluated the total active range of motion of the distal interphalangeal (DIP), PIP, and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints; visual analog scale;7 DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) score; grip strength; and Kapandji test8 (for thumb motion evaluation during opposition to long fingers). Being impossible to equally compare all these data, as all the tests have different numerical ranges, we decided to make them homogeneous by calibrating their minimum and maximum values from 0 to 30. According to all the data provided from the different evaluation systems, we could obtain poor, fair, good, and excellent results—“poor” for mean values between 0 and 7, “fair” for values between 7 and 15, “good” for values between 16 and 21, and “excellent” for values between 22 and 30. We recorded poor results in 13 patients (28%), fair results in none, good results in 28 patients (61%), and excellent results in 5 patients (11%) (Figure 18[A]-8). Similar to literature data,5 tendon injuries in the ring and little fingers led to the worst recovery of range of motion of the hand. No repairs ruptured.



The second study that we carried out between 2005 and 2008 compared two different treatments: (1) 22 patients (22 FDP tendons injured in zone 2) treated by pull-out technique followed by active digital flexion and extension exercise and (2) 22 patients (22 FDP tendons in zone 2) treated with two-strand repair methods (Tsuge, Kleinert, Kessler, or Kessler-Tajima) followed by either Kleinert or Duran early motion programs. Our referring hand therapist evaluated all the patients at 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery. We recorded impressively superior results for the patients treated with the pull-out method: (1) faster recovery of the active range of digital motion, (2) lower number of rehabilitative sessions, (3) less pain and disability, and (4) earlier recovery in grip strength. The ultimate total range of active digital motion was not significantly different, and repair ruptures were not recorded in either group.


We had no case of deep infection or tendon rupture. A few patients had superficial infection on the fingertip, due to prolonged contact of the button on the skin. The wound healed within a few days after use of local and oral antibiotics and daily careful disinfection. An infrequent but serious complication is a permanent residual loss of extension of the PIP joint, due to late start of active mobilization. This often occurred in low-compliant patients. However, they seldom requested surgical treatment (tenolysis) because the extension deficits were often only mild and were not bothersome, creating no serious limitation of function.


Mar 5, 2016 | Posted by in Hand surgery | Comments Off on Flexor Tendon Repairs with Novel Sutures and Devices

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access