Chapter 18 Flexor Tendon Repairs with Novel Sutures and Devices
A Mantero’s Technique for Tendon Repair
Outline
The pull-out technique was described by Bunnell in the beginning of the 20th century for tendon repair. Mantero and colleagues1–3 started using the technique in 1973 in association with immediate postoperative active motion. With this regimen, the occurrence of tendon adherence and an hypertrophic cutaneous scar with consequent acquired and permanent deformity and stiffness of the joints was remarkably decreased.
Indications
Any clean-cut injury of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon in zone 2 or the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon in zone 2 can be repaired with this technique. This method is also indicated for FDP tendon injuries in proximal zone 1, where direct end-to-end tendon repair is necessary.1,4–6 However, we do not use this method in the case of complex trauma (e.g., amputation or tendon injury associated with exposed fracture), because early motion is not possible, and the button on the top of the finger carries a risk of causing ischemia in situations in which digital circulation is already poor.
Surgical Techniques
Under regional anaesthesia, two cut tendon ends are exposed through a Bruner’s skin incision. A needle (size: 20G) used for spinal anesthesia is inserted from the fingertip and passed through the distal FDP tendon stump, from distal to proximal. Then, a 2-0 nylon thread is passed in the proximal tendon stump for 1 to 1.5 cm from the cut creating an Ω-shaped loop. The needle is then cut and the two ends of the suture are passed in the distal tendon stump by the previously inserted needle. The thread is pulled out from the tip of the finger and its two ends are secured over a mother-of-pearl button with multiple knots (Figures 18[A]-1 to 18[A]-6). For all repairs, ensuring correct coaptation of the two tendon ends with good tension is very important and depends on the surgeon’s experience. A running suture with 4-0 suture is added to tighten the tendon edges. Previously, we used a 4-0 Prolene suture and noted some foreign body reactions caused by sutures during long-term follow-up, and suture remnants had to be removed. We prefer to use absorbable (such as PDS) sutures presently.
Figure 18(A)-3 A case of zone 2B flexor tendon injury in a child and skin incisions to expose the tendons.
Figure 18(A)-4 The retracted proximal tendon stump was exposed and pulled distally under the A2 pulley.
Figure 18(A)-6 The thread was passed through the distal stump of the tendon and tired over a mother-of-pearl button on the fingertip.
Postoperative Care
Immediate active motion is the keystone to success with this technique and it has to start as soon as possible.1–4 In particular, full extension of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint must be achieved in the first few days after surgery. On the first day, the dressing is reduced and the patient can start active digital motion with the wrist in a protected position (wrist in flexion). Daily homework is given to the patient, so that he or she can be autonomous, not only in moving but also in cleaning and renewing the dressings if necessary. One week later, the wound is checked and any remaining swelling is controlled. If possible, a smaller dressing is placed to allow a wider range of motion. The range of active digital flexion is increased gradually (Figure 18[A]-7). At about 21 days, it is important to observe whether there are any early clinical signs of block of tendon gliding or joint motion. If nothing abnormal is found, more vigorous and full active digital flexion exercises are performed.
Outcomes
We conducted two studies on patients who were treated with the pull-out technique. Both studies contained only a portion of the patients who were treated in this period. The patients included in the two studies were those living in close proximity to our city, so they could come to our department for regular follow-up. In the first study, we followed 46 patients with injuries to 46 FDP or FPL tendons in zone 2 treated with this method between 2005 and 2008. At postoperative weeks 3, 6, and 12, we evaluated the total active range of motion of the distal interphalangeal (DIP), PIP, and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints; visual analog scale;7 DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) score; grip strength; and Kapandji test8 (for thumb motion evaluation during opposition to long fingers). Being impossible to equally compare all these data, as all the tests have different numerical ranges, we decided to make them homogeneous by calibrating their minimum and maximum values from 0 to 30. According to all the data provided from the different evaluation systems, we could obtain poor, fair, good, and excellent results—“poor” for mean values between 0 and 7, “fair” for values between 7 and 15, “good” for values between 16 and 21, and “excellent” for values between 22 and 30. We recorded poor results in 13 patients (28%), fair results in none, good results in 28 patients (61%), and excellent results in 5 patients (11%) (Figure 18[A]-8). Similar to literature data,5 tendon injuries in the ring and little fingers led to the worst recovery of range of motion of the hand. No repairs ruptured.
Figure 18(A)-8 Complete recovery of active finger flexion after surgical repair of FDP tendon of the little finger with the pull-out method.
Discussion
Because the pull-out technique is not popular outside of southern Europe, it is difficult to compare our results with reports in the literature. However, we agree with Wulle5 that the best results of the pull-out repair method are achieved in young patients with early tendon motion exercise, even when injuries of the arteries and/or nerves coexist. Elder patients have a worse prognosis.