Surveillance Following Breast Reconstruction



Surveillance Following Breast Reconstruction


Valerie Lemaine

Colleen M. McCarthy

Andrea Pusic



Introduction

Breast reconstruction following mastectomy has been shown to have a positive effect on the psychological well-being of women with breast cancer. For patients undergoing mastectomy, options for breast reconstruction include single-stage implant reconstruction, two-stage tissue expander/implant reconstruction, and autologous reconstruction with or without the use of implants. However, regardless of the type of oncologic treatment received or which method of reconstruction is chosen, locoregional recurrence of breast cancer can occur. Approximately 5% of breast cancer patients experience locoregional disease recurrence within 5 years, and this rate increases to 10% to 15% after 10 years (1,2,3,4,5,6). The early detection of a potentially treatable relapse remains the primary objective of continued oncologic surveillance following mastectomy. Some have questioned whether the presence of a prosthetic device and/or autologous tissue can delay detection and/or interfere with the treatment of locoregional recurrence. Furthermore, there is little agreement on the appropriateness of routine radiologic surveillance of these patients, as well as on the surgical management of locoregional recurrence. This chapter outlines the known mechanisms of breast cancer recurrence, its various patterns of clinical presentation, and the timing of presentation of a locoregional recurrence. An overview of the most effective available methods of surveillance is also provided in order to guide the management of locoregional recurrence in the reconstructed breast.


Mechanisms of Recurrence

Factors influencing recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy include the pathologic status of the axillary lymph nodes (7,8,9), the size of the primary tumor, the histologic grade of the tumor, the presence of skin fixation or clinical invasion, gross invasion of deep fascia, ulceration of the skin, breast edema, and the administration of adjuvant therapies, especially radiation (10).

Failure of mastectomy to prevent recurrent breast cancer may be attributable to the minimal yet irreducible percentage of breast tissue that remains after mastectomy. It is presumed that breast cancer recurrence arises from the native breast skin and/or the anterior chest wall itself, either of which may contain residual breast parenchyma or draining lymphatics (10). In fact, it has been shown that residual breast tissue exists in 46% of mastectomized breasts with skin flaps less than or equal to 5 mm thick and in 81% of those with skin flaps greater than 5 mm thick (11). Other proposed mechanisms for local recurrence include transection of the tumor with surgical implantation in the wound, retrograde embolization of the tumor through transected lymphatics, and implantation of tumor cells in the overlying mastectomy skin following needle biopsy (12,13,14).

Some have hypothesized that the presence of a permanent prosthesis may interfere with the body’s immunologic surveillance of recurrent disease (15,16). Others have suggested that more-invasive and/or lengthier surgical procedures, such as the performance of autogenous tissue reconstruction, may result in increased breast cancer recurrence. In other surgical disciplines, invasive procedures have been shown to result in higher levels of immunosuppression compared to less invasive procedures (17). To date, however, no clinical data have been produced that support these hypotheses in the setting of oncologic breast reconstruction.


Local Recurrence in the Reconstructed Breast


Presentation of A Local Recurrence

Local recurrence after breast reconstruction may have several clinical manifestations. Most commonly, a local recurrence presents in the form of a palpable mass or focal skin change (18,19,20) (Fig. 78.1). In the case of an autologous reconstruction, the differential diagnosis of such a lesion in or on the reconstructed breast mound includes the development of fat necrosis, a chronic seroma, abscess formation, suture granuloma, fibrocystic disease, and/or a new or recurrent breast cancer. The development of a local recurrence in the absence of any clinical signs or symptoms has also been reported.

Recently, it was shown that recurrences occur most commonly in the same quadrant as the primary tumor (21). Subcutaneous local recurrences are reported more often in the literature than chest wall recurrences, given that these can often be detected on clinical examination (18,19,21,22). Of importance, the subset of patients who present with isolated local recurrence confined to the skin/subcutaneous tissue has a more favorable prognosis, a lower risk of distant metastases, and a better response to treatment (10,23,24).


Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction

Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) was first described in the literature by Toth and Lappert in 1991 (25). Performed in combination with immediate breast reconstruction, this procedure may offer superior cosmetic results than conventional non–skin-sparing mastectomy. In terms of local tumor control, SSM has been shown to be an oncologically safe procedure (3,26), particularly for patients with smaller tumors (i.e., T1 or T2) (27,28).

In a landmark comparative series, Kroll et al. found no increased risk of local recurrence in patients with early-stage breast cancer who had undergone SSM or conventional mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction (29). Many other studies have also confirmed that recurrence rates
for patients who undergo immediate or delayed postmastectomy reconstruction are comparable to those who undergo no reconstruction at all (3,5,6,10,13,18,22,26,30,31).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 23, 2016 | Posted by in Reconstructive surgery | Comments Off on Surveillance Following Breast Reconstruction

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access