Reconstruction of the Breast Following Tumor Recurrence



Reconstruction of the Breast Following Tumor Recurrence


Melissa A. Crosby

David W. Chang



Introduction

Surgical therapy for breast cancer has evolved over the last few decades with a trend toward earlier detection, a lower recurrence rate, and higher survival rates. Today, options for the surgical management of primary breast cancer include mastectomy, mastectomy plus reconstruction, and breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy, all of which have been shown to have equivalent long-term survival rates in randomized prospective trials (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9). However, breast cancer can recur regardless of the treatment chosen, sometimes necessitating further surgery. In patients with recurrent breast cancer who desire breast reconstruction after surgical therapy, breast reconstruction options can depend on the initial and subsequent modalities used to treat the cancer.


Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Therapy

Breast-conserving therapy is an acceptable alternative to mastectomy in patients diagnosed with stage I or II breast cancer and has no adverse effect on long-term survival. The local recurrence rate after breast-conserving therapy ranges from 9% to 15%, or about 0.5% to 2% per year (3,8,10). When local recurrence occurs after breast-conserving therapy, patients are often treated with a completion mastectomy or what is often referred to as a salvage mastectomy.

Performing breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients with recurrent disease after breast-conserving therapy can be challenging because of changes due to the prior surgery and/or radiotherapy. In addition, many patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy did so to preserve breast aesthetics, and when they learn that they have a recurrence that will lead to the loss of the breast that they were attempting to preserve, they may experience more psychological distress concerning the diagnosis and need for mastectomy and have higher expectations concerning reconstructive results than patients who did not undergo breast-conserving therapy (11). Another consideration is that many women, particularly younger women, who develop a recurrence following breast conservation therapy may now be wanting a prophylactic mastectomy as well for both oncologic and emotional reasons (Fig. 79.1).


Implant-Based Reconstruction

In patients who have undergone breast-conserving therapy, the location of the surgical scar, quality and quantity of skin remaining, use of radiation and any resulting sequelae, and type of prior axillary surgery all influence the choice of reconstruction method. Many studies have suggested that implant-based reconstruction in the setting of prior radiotherapy leads to inferior results and an increased incidence of complications, including infection, extrusion, capsular contracture, and reconstruction failure (12). Given the high complication rates associated with implant-based breast reconstruction in the setting of prior radiotherapy, most surgeons prefer to use autologous tissue to reconstruct a previously irradiated breast. Furthermore, completion mastectomy following failed breast-conserving therapy often results in a relatively large skin defect that requires the use of an autologous flap.


Autologous Flap Combined with An Implant

In certain patients with insufficient amount of autologous tissue for adequate breast reconstruction, an implant can be added to provide more volume. Using an autologous flap to protect an implant from the negative effects of further irradiation in a previously irradiated breast has been evaluated (13). Freeman et al. evaluated the use of two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi (LD) myocutaneous flap coverage in 12 patients in whom breast-conserving therapy had failed and found satisfactory aesthetic results and a capsular contracture rate of 12.5% with a mean follow-up time of 50 months (38). More recently, Spear et al. evaluated 28 patients with previously irradiated breasts who underwent breast reconstruction with an LD flap and implant and found an implant-related complication rate of 14%, a mean cosmetic satisfaction rating of 8.5 of 10, and a mean overall satisfaction rating of 8.8 of 10 (14). They concluded that although breast reconstruction with autologous tissue alone may be the best choice for patients who have undergone radiotherapy, breast reconstruction with an LD flap and implant also provides an acceptable cosmetic result and complication rate (14). In addition, Chang et al. found that, among patients who received radiotherapy prior to mastectomy and reconstruction, significantly fewer reconstructions failed in patients who had undergone breast reconstructions with an LD flap and implant (15%) or a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap and implant (10%) than in patients who had undergone breast reconstructions with an expander and implant alone (42%; p < 0.03) (15).

In our experience, using an autologous tissue flap combined with an implant for breast reconstruction appears to reduce the incidence of implant-related complications in previously irradiated breasts. A well-vascularized flap may improve wound healing and thus reduce the risk of wound dehiscence and infection. An autologous tissue flap also provides a well-vascularized pocket for the implant, which minimizes the contact between the implant and the surrounding irradiated tissue. Although the implant sits on the chest wall, covering the
implant with well-vascularized tissue may reduce the risk of capsular contracture associated with radiotherapy.






Figure 79.1. A 44-year-old woman with a history of left breast segmental mastectomy and radiation presented with a recurrence. She underwent completion mastectomy, prophylactic mastectomy, and immediate reconstruction with bilateral free deep interior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. A: Preoperative photo. B: Following bilateral free DIEP flaps


Autologous Breast Reconstruction

As previously mentioned, completion mastectomy following failed breast-conserving therapy often results in relatively large skin defect, and thus immediate reconstruction would be needed in many cases just to provide the wound closure (Fig. 79.2). However, the situation in unlike most other immediate breast reconstructions, the axilla have already been violated surgically and the chest wall has been irradiated.

In a patient who has had prior axillary surgery or radiotherapy, the status of the thoracodorsal vessels is uncertain. The status of the thoracodorsal vessels is pertinent when considering the use of a LD flap for breast reconstruction. Although studies have shown that the thoracodorsal pedicle often remains intact despite surgical scarring and radiation sclerosis (15), fibrosis due to radiotherapy makes dissecting the pedicle difficult, necessitating greater care during exploration. We recommend exploring the axilla first to ensure the viability of the thoracodorsal vessels before committing to raising the LD flap (Fig. 79.3).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 23, 2016 | Posted by in Reconstructive surgery | Comments Off on Reconstruction of the Breast Following Tumor Recurrence

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access