Noncancer Breast Surgery


Chapter 10

Noncancer Breast Surgery




Reduction Mammaplasty



1. Macromastia signs and symptoms


• Back pain, shoulder and neck pain, trapezius m. hypertrophy, shoulder strap grooving, and inframammary fold (IMF) intertrigo


2. Preoperative considerations


• Degree of ptosis and hypertrophy and desired postoperative size will help determine the amount of parenchymal reduction required and assist with selection of skin incision pattern and pedicle location.


• Postoperative nipple-areolar complex (NAC) perfusion and sensation


▪ Most important determinant of postoperative sensation is location of glandular resection and pedicle selection (lateral pedicle, inferior pedicle, or medial pedicle are best), not reduction volume, preoperative breast volume, skin incision pattern, and/or sternal notch-to-nipple distance.


• Postoperative lactation


▪ Rates of breast-feeding in women after breast reduction surgery are similar to those of child-bearing women who have not had breast reduction surgery.


○ Approximately 30% of women after inferior pedicle breast reduction breast-feed either exclusively or with formula supplementation.


▪ Most important determinant of ability to breast-feed after breast reduction surgery is pedicle thickness


○ Pedicle type and reduction volume has no effect.


○ Impossible with free nipple grafting.


• Smoking cessation


• Breast measurements (see Figures 10.1 and 10.2)


▪ Sternal notch-to-nipple distance


▪ Nipple-to-IMF distance


▪ Nipple-to-midline distance


▪ Breast base width


▪ Many advocate for preoperative mammography before surgery with any breast masses, breast complaints, or at-risk women (>35-40 years old [yo]) whose mammogram is over 1 year old.


○ Risk of occult breast cancer occurrence in reduction specimen is extremely rare (reportedly 0.2%).


○ When found, cancer is often early stage or in situ carcinoma.




3. Techniques


• Suction lipectomy


▪ Can be used alone in select patients


▪ Contraindicated in patients with breast ptosis or who will likely require skin reduction


▪ Advantages


○ Minimal scars


○ Rapid recovery and return to work


○ Decreased operative time


○ Minimal risk to nipple sensation/perfusion


○ Minimal risk to postoperative lactation


▪ Disadvantages


○ Unable to pathologically examine lipoaspirate


○ High risk of inadequate reduction


○ Skin contraction unpredictable, leading to excess skin


○ Unable to correct breast ptosis


• Traditional reduction mammaplasty


▪ Combines a skin excision pattern with a pedicle to maintain nipple perfusion


○ Skin patterns include Wise pattern, keyhole, vertical, and no-vertical-scar techniques


○ Pedicle options include superior, medial, superomedial, inferior, lateral, and central pedicle


◆ The inferior pedicle can achieve significant volume reduction and reduce the vertical dimension of the breast.


➔ Can be used for all reductions, including moderate to severe reductions (>800 g)


• Vertical mammaplasty


▪ Uses a vertical-only skin excision that reduces scar burden and narrows the breast, thereby increasing projection


▪ The initial breast shape is poor with a characteristic flattened, lower pole and inferior dog ears; however, this improves after 3 to 6 months.


▪ This technique is generally used for moderate reductions (<800 g) or smaller but is contraindicated with a long pedicle length >9 cm because of concerns with nipple perfusion.


4. Complications: Risk factors include obesity, reduction volume >1000 g, and smoking.


• Infection


• Scarring


▪ Long-term complication most associated with patient dissatisfaction


• Seroma, hematoma


▪ Greatest risk factor for hematoma is hypotensive anesthesia


▪ Drains have not reduced the incidence of hematoma.


• Fat necrosis


▪ Characteristic finding: Development of delayed, firm, and nontender masses


• Asymmetry


• Skin loss and wound development (especially at the inferior T junction in Wise pattern reductions)


▪ Most common complication in obese patients with large reduction volume


• Under-resection


▪ May require reoperation


• NAC complications


▪ Incidence <5%


▪ Risk factors: Smoking, elevated body mass index (BMI), and long pedicle


▪ Etiology


○ Intrinsic physiologic risk (obesity, smoking)


○ Excessive nipple-to-IMF distance/pedicle length and excessive sternal notch-to-nipple distance


○ Torsion of the pedicle


○ Excessive tension on the closure


▪ Management


○ If immediately after reduction, pedicle exploration with release of tension


○ If pedicle release does not result in improvement, convert to free nipple graft


◆ Be sure to graft to well-vascularized tissue and not the compromised skin flap or pedicle.


○ If nipple compromise occurs after early postoperative period, observation and conservative wound care



Mastopexy



1. Many similarities with reduction mammoplasty; however, primary goal is to lift the breast and correct breast ptosis


2. Breast ptosis: Relationship of the NAC to the IMF and lower contour of the breast (see Figures 10.3 and 10.4)


• Regnault classification


▪ Grade I: NAC within 1 cm of the IMF and above the lower contour of the breast


▪ Grade II: NAC is 1-3 cm below the IMF but above the lower contour of the breast


▪ Grade III: NAC >3 cm below the IMF and at the lower contour of the breast


▪ Grade IV (pseudoptosis): NAC at the level of the IMF, but the majority of the breast volume has descended below the IMF


○ Increased nipple-to-IMF distance in setting of stable sternal notch-to-nipple distance


Sep 2, 2016 | Posted by in Aesthetic plastic surgery | Comments Off on Noncancer Breast Surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access