Methotrexate




Keywords

Methotrexate, MTX, Folate antagonist, CHAMPION, RESTORE1

 




Key points








  • Methotrexate (MTX) remains a safe and effective modality for the treatment of severe, recalcitrant psoriasis when used appropriately.



  • The exact mechanism of action of MTX in psoriasis is unknown, but it is thought to involve an immune modulatory effect on the T-cell–mediated inflammation in psoriasis.



  • Studies demonstrate improvement of psoriatic lesions using 10 to 25 mg per week MTX as a single oral, intramuscular, or intravenous dose.



  • Adverse effects reported after MTX therapy include nausea, loss of appetite, vomiting, diarrhea, bone marrow toxicity, pulmonary toxicity, and hepatotoxicity.



  • Close monitoring of hematologic, liver, and renal function tests are indicated before and during MTX treatment.






Introduction


Methotrexate (MTX) is a well-established systemic treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) first approved the use of MTX for the treatment of severe, recalcitrant, disabling psoriasis in 1972. Today, approximately 20,000 to 30,000 psoriatic patients in the United States receive MTX treatment yearly.


MTX is the mainstay of treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and the rheumatologic literature thoroughly describes its safety profiles, which include the common side effects of nausea, loss of appetite, vomiting, and diarrhea, and more severe adverse effects (AEs) of bone marrow, pulmonary, and hepatic toxicity. Greater knowledge of MTX and its effect on patients with RA has promoted conscientious use of this medication in patients battling with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Dermatologists have expanded indications for prescribing MTX to other forms of severe psoriasis, including PsA, erythrodermic psoriasis, acute and localized forms of pustular psoriasis, nail psoriasis, psoriasis that is recalcitrant to alternative treatments, and/or psoriasis that significantly impacts a patient’s economic or psychological well-being and does not respond appropriately to retinoid, phototherapy, or psoralen and UV-A therapy. There are many off-label uses of MTX, such as scleroderma, dermatomyositis, alopecia areata, and others. In addition to psoriasis and RA, MTX is FDA approved for use in malignant neoplastic diseases, including gestational choriocarcinoma, chorioadenoma destruens, hydatidiform mole, acute lymphocytic leukemia, meningeal leukemia, mycosis fungoides, non-Hodgkin lymphomas as well as cancers of the head and neck, breast, and lung, but doses for malignancies are much higher than those used for dermatologic indications.


Physicians caring for patients with psoriasis taking MTX are faced with the challenge of identifying optimal therapeutic doses, while managing adverse side effects. Appropriate use of MTX requires a gradual increasing of dosages paired with careful patient management. Several guidelines on MTX dosing regimens have been published and are largely based on expert opinions, although administration strategies vary widely.


MTX is manufactured as oral tablets or intramuscular, intravenous, or intra-arterial injections. The tablet form is 2.5 mg MTX disodium, whereas the injection is 25 mg/mL MTX sodium. The recommended starting dose schedule for psoriasis is a once-weekly, low-dose schedule of either a single oral, intramuscular, or intravenous 7.5- to 15-mg per week dose until adequate response is achieved or a divided oral dose schedule 2.5 mg at 12-hour intervals for a total of 3 doses ( Fig. 4.1 ). Some physicians recommend a test dose as low as 5 mg for the first week of treatment. Dosages should be adjusted to the individual patient (ie, reduced doses for decreased renal function, the elderly patient, or persons with low body mass index vs greater doses for those with extensive, intractable disease), while avoiding higher doses. MTX can be used for long-term management of plaque psoriasis and should be continued until optimal clinical responses are achieved. There is not an established maximum dose, although many use 25 to 30 mg as a maximum. Following improvement of lesions, dosages are typically tapered to the lowest effective dose and may be continued long term with adequate monitoring owing to the risk of toxicity. MTX should be kept in an area that is not readily accessible to children. Tablets and injection vials should be stored in areas with little heat or moisture, adequate light protection, and room temperatures 59°F to 86°F (15°C to 30°C). Special care should be taken not to freeze injection vials.




Fig. 4.1


MTX dosing regimen for psoriasis.

( From Czarnecka-Operacz M, Sadowska-Przytocka A. The possibilities and principles of methotrexate treatment of psoriasis—the updated knowledge. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 2014;31:392–400.)




Mechanism of action


MTX is a folate antagonist that interferes with de novo purine synthesis by inhibiting the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase. This critical enzyme is responsible for converting dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate, and its inhibition lowers the synthesis of DNAs, particularly purines and thymidylate. For this reason, MTX effectively hinders cellular replication ( Fig. 4.2 ).




Fig. 4.2


MTX mechanism of action.


The exact mechanism of action of MTX in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis is not fully understood. Traditionally, the antiproliferative role of MTX was assumed to be most effective against the rapidly proliferating psoriatic epidermis. Inhibition of DNA synthesis during the S phase of the cell cycle would theoretically decrease epithelial cell production and parallel keratinization rates of normal skin.


However, this long-standing theory has been disproven. Novel concepts emphasize this drug’s immune modulatory properties that downgrade the psoriasis inflammatory cascade by promoting apoptosis and suppressing intracellular adhesion molecule expression of T cells involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. In addition, MTX inhibits neutrophil chemotaxis and reduces levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1 (IL-1). These ideas represent fundamental advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of psoriasis in the last decade, and further studies are needed to better elucidate its immune activity.




Efficacy


There is a scant amount of evidence regarding the efficacy of MTX in plaque psoriasis, despite its former widespread usage. Much of the existing drug data is primarily derived from trials involving patients with RA. To date, large randomized, controlled trials, such as the CHAMPION, RESTORE, M10-255, and a few smaller trials, have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MTX for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Table 4.1 provides a summary of these trials, including their comparative interventions, primary endpoints, and outcomes.



Table 4.1

Efficacy data of methotrexate studies






































































Study, Year (n = Subjects) Comparator (mg) MTX Dosing mg (no. wk)


  • MTX



    • a.

      PASI-75


    • b.

      PASI-50


    • c.

      PASI-90




  • Outcome (%)




  • Comparator



    • a.

      PASI-75


    • b.

      PASI-50


    • c.

      PASI-90




  • Outcome (%)

CHAMPION, 2008 (n = 271) Adalimumab, placebo 7.5 (0–1)
10.0 (2–3)
15.0 (4–7)
20.0 (8–12) a
25.0 (2–16) a


  • a.

    35.5


  • b.

    NR


  • c.

    13.6



  • a.

    79.6, 18.9


  • b.

    NR


  • c.

    51.3, 11.3

RESTORE1, (n = 868) Infliximab 15.0 (1–5)
20.0 (6–16) a


  • a.

    42


  • b.

    61


  • c.

    19



  • a.

    78


  • b.

    87


  • c.

    55

M10–255, (n = 317) Briakinumab 5.0 (0)
10.0 (1)
15.0 (2–9)
20.0 (10–15) a
25.0 (16–24)


  • a.

    39.9


  • b.

    23.9


  • c.

    NR a



  • a.

    81.8


  • b.

    66.2


  • c.

    NR a

Flystrom et al, 2008 (n = 84) CsA 7.5 (0–12)
15.0 (0–12) a


  • a.

    24


  • b.

    65


  • c.

    11



  • a.

    58


  • b.

    87


  • c.

    29

Heydendael et al, 2003 (n = 88) CsA 15.0 (1–4)
22.5 (5–16)


  • a.

    60


  • b.

    NR


  • c.

    40



  • a.

    71


  • b.

    NR


  • c.

    33

Akhyani et al, 2010 (n = 38) MMF 7.5 (0–1)
15 (2–4)
20 (5–12)


  • a.

    73.3


  • b.

    100


  • c.

    26.7



  • a.

    58.8


  • b.

    82.4


  • c.

    11.8

Dogra et al, 2012 MTX (25 mg vs 10 mg) N/A

  • a.

    72


  • b.

    NR


  • c.

    NR



  • a.

    92


  • b.

    NR


  • c.

    NR

Ho et al, 2010 TCM 2.5–5 (0–1)
10 (1–2) a


  • a.

    63


  • b.

    79


  • c.

    NR



  • a.

    0


  • b.

    14


  • c.

    NR

Fallah Arani et al, 2011 Fumaric acid 5 (0–1)
15 (2–12)
12.5 (13)
10 (14)
5 (15)
2.5 (16)


  • a.

    24


  • b.

    60


  • c.

    8



  • a.

    19


  • b.

    42


  • c.

    4

Revicki et al, 2008 Adalimumab 7.5–25 (0–15) a

  • a.

    80


  • b.

    88


  • c.

    51



  • a.

    36


  • b.

    62


  • c.

    14


Abbreviations: CsA, cyclosporine; NR, not reported; TCM, traditional Chinese medicine.

Data from Refs.

a Step up therapy if response was inadequate and no AEs were noted, the dosage was increased.



CHAMPION


The CHAMPION trial was a phase 3, placebo-controlled study that was the first to compare oral MTX to adalimumab and placebo for the treatment of psoriasis. The study enrolled 271 patients from 28 different sites across Europe and Canada and randomized them in a 2:2:1 ratio to receive MTX, adalimumab, or placebo for 16 weeks. Oral MTX was dosed at 7.5 mg at week 0, increased to 10 mg/wk at week 2, and finally 15 mg/wk at week 4. Patients who achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 50 by week 8 were maintained on the 15-mg/wk dose, and those who did not were increased to 20 mg/wk. Any patient not achieving PASI-50 by week 12 was increased to a maximum study dose of 25 mg/wk. Efficacy was defined as achieving a PASI 75 response after 16 weeks of treatment. Patients with prior exposure to TNF antagonists were excluded. The trial demonstrated greater PASI-75 scores for adalimumab (79.6%) to oral MTX (35.5%) and placebo (18.9%) for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Further analysis of the CHAMPION trial suggests that week 12 may be a crucial time period to decide whether a patient should continue MTX treatment or change to a different medication. Fig. 4.3 demonstrates the efficacy data of the CHAMPION trial.




Fig. 4.3


Efficacy data of CHAMPION trial.


RESTORE1


The RESTORE1 trial was a phase 3, open-label, randomized, controlled trial that compared the efficacy and safety of oral MTX to infliximab in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The study enrolled 868 patients, who were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive infliximab 5 mg/kg (infusions at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, and 22) or MTX 2.5-mg tablets (15 mg/wk for the first 6 weeks, which could be increased to 20 mg/wk if patients failed to achieve PASI-25 from baseline by week 6). Patients who were intolerant to the treatment or had not achieved PASI-50 from baseline by week 16 were able to switch treatment groups. Patients who switched from MTX to infliximab therapy were administered infliximab infusions at weeks 16, 18, and 22. Patients who switched from infliximab to MTX received 15 mg MTX weekly until week 22. Last treatments were administered at week 22, and final follow-up occurred at week 26. Folic acid supplementation was recommended, but not required. The primary efficacy endpoint was defined as a PASI-75 at week 16, whereas additional major endpoints included PASI-75 at week 26 and a Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score of cleared or minimal (0 or 1, respectively) at weeks 16 and 26. Patients with previous exposure to MTX were excluded from the study. MTX was found to be less efficacious than infliximab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, and by week 16, 63 of 215 (29%) patients taking MTX switched to infliximab. Only 9 of 653 (1%) infliximab patients switched to MTX. At week 16, 78% of infliximab patients attained PASI-75 in comparison to 42% on MTX therapy ( P <.001). This score was consistent at week 26 when 77% of infliximab achieved PASI-75, whereas only 31% of MTX patients achieved PASI-75 ( P <.001). In general, higher percentage of infliximab patients achieved PASI-50 and PASI-75 than MTX patients at all visits.


M10-255


The M10-255 trial was a phase 3, randomized, double-blinded, clinical study comparing oral MTX with folic acid to briakinumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting IL-12 and IL-23. The study enrolled 317 patients randomized to receive either briakinumab or MTX. Baseline MTX dosage was 5 mg/wk at week 0 to 15 mg/wk and escalated by 5 mg at weeks 10 and 16 if patients did not achieve a PASI-75 or PGA 0 to 1. The primary endpoint consisted of PASI-75 or PGA 0 to 1 at 24 and 52 weeks. Results demonstrated greater percentage of patients achieving clearance with briakinumab (81.8%) than MTX (39.9%) at week 24 and 66.2% versus 23.9% at week 52, respectively ( P <.001).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 23, 2019 | Posted by in General Surgery | Comments Off on Methotrexate

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access