Levator extirpation and frontalis suspension







Table 18.1

Indications for surgery







Marcus Gunn syndrome with functional or cosmetically displeasing jaw wink
Unilateral ptosis with poor levator function requiring frontalis suspension


Table 18.2

Preoperative evaluation















Ptosis evaluation (MRD1, levator excursion, frontalis function, eyelid malpositions, lagophthalmos)
Photographic and/or video documentation of eyelid position with opening, closing and side-to-side movements of the jaw (synkinetic movement)
Rule out amblyopia
Presence of Bell’s phenomenon
Evaluation for associated strabismus (including monocular elevation deficiency)
Slit lamp examination/ocular surface evaluation


Introduction


Eyelid ptosis repair with levator extirpation and concomitant frontalis suspension may be performed for a symptomatic jaw wink associated with Marcus Gunn syndrome as well as severe unilateral, poor levator ptosis.


Marcus Gunn syndrome is characterized by aberrant innervation between cranial nerve III and V resulting in synkinetic movements of the levator palpebrae superioris and the ipsilateral pterygoid muscles. The synkinetic movement can be seen during infancy as variable upper eyelid retraction with opening of the mouth, chewing, and sucking. Lateral, side-to-side jaw movements may also bring about the jaw wink associated with this syndrome. Marcus Gunn is typically unilateral, but bilateral cases have been described.


The clinical presentation of Marcus Gunn is variable, depending on the degree of aberrant miswiring. Ipsilateral ptosis from levator dysgenesis may be the prominent presentation necessitating levator resection ( Chapter 14 ) or frontalis suspension ( Chapter 15 ). Alternatively, the levator function may be preserved and the most symptomatic finding is the displeasing wink seen with jaw movements.


The evaluation of Marcus Gunn should include documentation of eyelid position and levator excursion with full jaw movements. Photographic and video documentation are useful to educate patient and parents about the condition and surgical outcomes. An evaluation for associated strabismus, in particular co-existent superior rectus dysfunction, should be performed. Any amblyopia from strabismus or anisometropia must be addressed with spectacle correction and patching before considering eyelid surgery.


If the jaw winking phenomenon does not objectively improve with age or if the patient is unable to mask the synkinesis, levator extirpation with frontalis suspension may be considered for treatment of this displeasing jaw wink. The decision of unilateral versus bilateral surgery is a controversial topic. Parents typically opt for unilateral surgery of the aberrantly innervated side to spare the normal side from surgical intervention. The primary benefit of surgery on both sides is to drive bilateral frontalis function when eyelid elevation is desired.


The surgical approach involves disinsertion of the levator aponeurosis from the tarsal plate and then extirpation of the levator. Multiple approaches have been described including anterior and posterior approaches as well as extirpation of the muscle at the level of Whitnall’s ligament and even to the orbital apex. The risks of recurrence of the jaw wink with suboptimal levator extirpation versus damage to the superior rectus with more aggressive muscle removal must be weighed carefully. Our preferred technique for mild-to-moderate jaw wink is a unilateral, anterior approach levator extirpation to the level of Whitnall’s ligament with disinsertion of the medial and lateral horns of the levator. Frontalis suspension is then performed with fascia lata or silicone rod. Silicone rod affords the advantage of easy reversibility, and this is important especially in patients with reduced corneal protection (poor Bell’s phenomenon). Furthermore, in patients under 2 years of age, harvesting of autologous fascia lata is not recommended.




Surgical Technique





Figures 18.1A and 18.1B


Skin marking

With levator dysgenesis, a well-formed eyelid crease may not be present in the affected side. Using a caliper, the upper eyelid crease of the normal side is marked and this is transposed to the surgical side at same height ( Figure 18.1A ). In this case, the crease is set to 6 mm to correspond to the normal eyelid. Then, three markings are made at the superior limit of the brow cilia: medial, central and lateral, 3–4 mm in length. The upper eyelid incision marking, in conjunction with the three eyebrow marks, outlines Fox’s pentagonal configuration ( Figure 18.1B ). Local anesthetic containing 1 : 200,000 epinephrine is given in the upper eyelid and brow incisions to aid with hemostasis.



Figures 18.2A–C


Exposure of tarsal plate and disinsertion of levator

After inserting a corneal protector, the upper eyelid crease incision is made using a #15 blade ( Figure 18.2A ). Once the eyelid crease incision is complete and the underlying orbicularis muscle is exposed, dissection is continued in the pretarsal plane, using cautery ( Figure 18.2B ). Once the superior tarsal border is identified, the dissection continues to expose the anterior face of the tarsal plate. The dissection continues inferiorly to expose the upper two-thirds of the tarsal plate ( Figure 18.2C ). The dissection to this level serves to disinsert the levator aponeurosis and provides a platform for silicone rod fixation after levator extirpation. Care is taken to avoid incising into the tarsal plate during dissection.

May 16, 2019 | Posted by in Reconstructive surgery | Comments Off on Levator extirpation and frontalis suspension

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access