Implant Exposure and Extrusion



Fig. 32.1
Implant exposure in a previous irradiated breast treated with nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant reconstruction and contralateral augmentation



A210807_1_En_32_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 32.2
Immediate result 15 days after surgery


A210807_1_En_32_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 32.3
Result 4 months after surgery


A210807_1_En_32_Fig4_HTML.jpg


Fig. 32.4
Result 6 months from the time of the first lipofilling


A210807_1_En_32_Fig5_HTML.jpg


Fig. 32.5
Result at 10 months when the second lipofilling is planned


A210807_1_En_32_Fig6_HTML.jpg


Fig. 32.6
Result 2 months from the last lipofilling at the time of the third lipofilling and tattooing


This is not the normal practice but the use of well-vascularized tissue can improve the irradiated tissue itself [13].



32.4.2 Case 2: High-Grade Capsular Contraction in Very Thin Mastectomy Skin Flaps


This situation needs an urgent solution. The presence of both capsular contraction and very thin tissue will require a flap in order to offer the patient an immediate solution.

In this case a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap was offered to solve the problem with contralateral breast reduction at the same time (Figs. 32.7, 32.8, 32.9 and 32.10).

A210807_1_En_32_Fig7_HTML.jpg


Fig. 32.7
Patient presents with high-grade capsular contraction


A210807_1_En_32_Fig8_HTML.jpg


Fig. 32.8
Preoperative planning for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction


A210807_1_En_32_Fig9_HTML.jpg


Fig. 32.9
Intraoperative assessment of the DIEP flap


A210807_1_En_32_Fig10_HTML.jpg


Fig. 32.10
Final result

The final aesthetic outcome was acceptable, but there was a previous periprosthetic capsule remained at the parasternal part. So lipofilling was suggested as a possible improvement.


32.4.3 Case 3: Expander Decubitus


This is another case of a patient who originally underwent immediate reconstruction with an expander. The reason for using the expander was because of the presence of a very thin mastectomy skin flap; it can be considered an emergency reconstruction.

During the expansion there was a decubitus of the expander and the procedure was changed to autologous reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (Fig. 32.11).

A210807_1_En_32_Fig11_HTML.jpg


Fig. 32.11
Patient with a decubitus of the expander and planning for DIEP flap reconstruction

The final result at the time of nipple–areola reconstruction is shown in Fig. 32.12.

A210807_1_En_32_Fig12_HTML.jpg


Fig. 32.12
Final result



32.5 Conclusion


The salvage of the infected and or exposed breast prosthesis remains a challenging but viable option for a subset of patients.

Keys to success include culture-directed antibiotics, capsulectomy, device exchange, and adequate soft tissue coverage. Relative contraindications to breast device salvage include atypical pathogens on wound culture, such as Gram-negative rods, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida parapsilosis.

Patients with a prior device infection and exposure and a history of either radiotherapy or S. aureus on wound culture should be closely monitored for signs of recurrent breast prosthesis infection/exposure and managed cautiously in the setting of elective breast surgery.

Apr 6, 2016 | Posted by in Reconstructive microsurgery | Comments Off on Implant Exposure and Extrusion

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access