CHAPTER 2 Current Observations of Periorbital Aging: A Prelude to Improved Surgical Results
Surgical approaches for the cosmetic improvement of the aging periorbita continue to evolve. A combination of factors have added to improved methods that relate to a higher level of understanding of facial aging that has been supported by information gained from the both histologic and gross anatomy dissections as well as observations made through imaging and photography. A large distraction has been a wide variety of personal perception of what occurs with facial aging combined with a surgical interpretation that did not always reflect the most accurate analysis or what would approach the rejuvenated state. Even simply evaluating ‘old’ photographs, although useful, can be deceptive, whereas the illusion of the components of facial aging are actually not supported by reality. Through morph-like techniques pioneered by Lambros1 whereby current and dated posturally matched images are superimposed that more accurately detect the changes in the various facial regions, we now have a better understanding of the truth of facial changes with age that have revealed surprising discoveries. As these findings relate to the periorbita, we have also found it useful to compare the same eyes and periorbital regions as they age, and report on what lessons can be learned from watching this progression.
Introduction
Although there is abundant variation in the aging patterns of the billions of human periorbita (eyes) on the planet, there are also commonalities that influence the way the eye region is perceived. An old Asian is as easily recognized as is an old Caucasian and for similar reasons.2
We have found it more useful to examine the aging face and periorbital region in a linear fashion rather than to look at populations for several reasons. Firstly, population studies are valuable for looking at particular eye regions at a particular point in time, but comparisons are necessarily on different eyes and statistical differences are the usual method of analysis. Tables and charts of measurements are customary in anthropologic studies, but not so in surgery which relies on more direct visual comparisons.3 Secondly and more importantly, seen at a single point in time, the aging face and periorbital region are frequently deceptive. Because finger elevation may make a part look better, the perfectly reasonable but not necessarily true assumption may be that the part has fallen.
For several years we have conducted linear comparisons in individuals by means of highly matched old and recent photographs, which are sized and aligned on stable points. The image pairs are then studied by overlaying the images on the computer and transitioning from one to the other. The eye is very sensitive to motion presented this way, and differences in position and shape are easy to see and compare (see Chapter 2, DVD).
If not taken on a digital camera, the old and recent prints are digitized and compared in an imaging program, in this study, Adobe Photoshop. The layers function of Photoshop digitally stacks one image on top of the other and is indispensable in accurately matching multiple images. By toggling the upper image on and off, any offset relative to the lower image is quickly visible. In the antero-posterior view, the alignment and sizing points are the medial canthal tendon’s insertion into the nasal side-wall, the interpupillary distance, the base of the columella and other confirmatory points. The two saved images, the old and the recent are then converted into a gif animation using Adobe Image Ready, or other gif animation programs. GIF Construction Set Professional (www.alchemymindworkshop.com) was extensively used in this series. The gif animation automates the process of fading from one aligned and sized image to the other for careful inspection (see Chapter 2, DVD).