Breast reconstruction

CHAPTER 57 Breast reconstruction




History


During the last century, breast reconstruction has evolved from a rarely performed surgical venture to a daily occurrence that has become an important part of the rehabilitation process following mastectomy or lumpectomy. The aesthetic quality of the reconstructions fostered by technical advances has emerged from that of the amorphous blobs appearing as breast mounds to nearly normal appearing breasts. Symmetry, which was hardly possible and seldom achieved, is now the standard for which we strive.


The modern era of breast reconstruction began in the 1960s with the introduction of the silicone gel-filled prosthesis for delayed reconstruction. Tissue expansion was then popularized during the following decade for chest wall reconstruction of severe soft tissue defects. In addition, latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flaps were then introduced and refined by Drs. Maxwell, Bostwick, and Vasconez. In the early 1980s, Hartrampf introduced the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap with future flap modifications to improve the tenuous blood supply, which included bipedicled, delayed, perforator, and free TRAM flaps. In early 1990s Dr. Allen pioneered microsurgical breast reconstruction with perforator flaps, which included DIEP, the S-GAP, the I-GAP and the SIEA procedures.


The advancements in breast reconstruction have provided plastic surgeons with a number of alternatives for reconstruction of lumpectomy defects to most severe radical mastectomy defects. Even though the management of radiated chest walls still remains a challenge; its overall management has improved. All women who are about to undergo or have had a mastectomy are potential candidates to be informed of breast reconstruction, however, not every woman elects to have it, and therefore must not be pushed to pursue it. There is perhaps no other area of reconstructive surgery where patient individualization is more important.


Management of breast cancer since the turn of the century has been evolving with a trend to less invasive procedures. Mastectomy is the most common treatment of localized breast cancer but may leave the patient feeling deformed and mutilated, therefore breast conservation therapy has been advocated for some patients. This procedure however, has its own set of complications since radiation therapy is required for complete management. The radiation changes and the lumpectomy deformities are at times more difficult to reconstruct than a mastectomy defect without radiation.




Anatomy


The breast is composed of both fatty tissue and glandular milk-producing tissues, and with age, the amount of fatty tissue increases as the glandular tissue diminishes. The soft tissues are supported by Cooper’s ligaments. They originate from the deep fascia and attach to the dermis and are considered to be the suspensory ligaments of the breast. The primary blood supply to the breast comes from the perforating branches of the internal mammary artery and all secondary blood supply come from the lateral thoracic, pectoral branches and the highest thoracic arteries. In addition lateral branches form the third, fourth and fifth posterior intercostal arteries. Sensory innervation of the breast is mainly derived from the anterolateral and anteromedial branches of thoracic intercostal nerves T3–T5. Supraclavicular nerves from the lower fibers of the cervical plexus also provide innervation to the upper and lateral portions of the breast. This overlap is thought to make the upper outer quadrant of the breast as the most sensitive portion. The lateral cutaneous branch of T4 is believed to be the primary innervation to the nipple. The breast lies over the musculature that encases the chest wall. The muscles involved include the pectoralis major, serratus anterior, external oblique, and rectus abdominus fascia. These muscles are very important both in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery since they provide additional soft tissue coverage.



Pectoralis major


The pectoralis major muscle originates from the medial clavicle and lateral sternum and inserts on the humerus (Fig. 57.1). The major blood supply is thoracoacromial artery in addition to the intercostal perforators. The medial and lateral anterior thoracic nerves provide innervation for the muscle. The action of the pectoralis major is to flex, adduct, and rotate the arm medially. This muscle becomes important when additional soft tissue coverage is needed for an implant both in an aesthetic as well as a reconstructive setting.




Serratus anterior


The serratus anterior muscle runs along the anterolateral chest wall. Its origin is the outer surface of the upper borders of the first through eighth ribs and inserts on the deep surface of the scapula (see Fig. 57.1). Its vascular supply is derived equally from the lateral thoracic artery and branches from the thoracodorsal artery. The long thoracic nerve serves to innervate the serratus anterior, which acts to rotate the scapula, raising the point of the shoulder and drawing the scapula forward toward the body. To completely cover the implant with muscle in reconstructive surgery, often the serratus anterior must be elevated sharply to obtain the necessary coverage.



Latissimus dorsi


The latissimus dorsi muscle, which is a mirror image of the pectoralis major, arises from the lower thoracic vertebrae, the lumbar and sacral spinal processes, and the iliac crest. Its large, flat muscle belly converges into a flat tendon that inserts into the lesser tubercle of the humerus. The thoracodorsal artery provides the dominant vascular supply to the flap (Fig. 57.2). The subscapular artery originates from the axillary artery, gives off the circumflex scapular artery, and terminates in the thoracodorsal artery. This vessel, located in the posterior aspect of the axilla, gives off one or two serratus branches before entering the anterior undersurface of the latissimus dorsi muscle. The thoracodorsal artery is accompanied on its course by the thoracodorsal nerve and veins. The structures can be injured during an aggressive axillary dissection and therefore assessment of the pedicle in these patients is important in the preoperative planning.




Rectus abdominus


The paired rectus abdominis muscles originate from the cartilage of the sixth, seventh, and eighth ribs and insert into the pubic tubercle and pubic crest (Fig. 57.3). The blood supply comes from the superior epigastric artery above and deep inferior epigastric artery below (Fig. 57.4). Within the muscle these main vascular sources may not have direct anastomoses with each other under normal physiologic conditions. Although the deep inferior epigastric system has been shown to be the primary vascular pedicle for this skin territory, the superior epigastric artery and vein are able to carry the lower abdominal soft tissue and comprise the vascular basis for the transverse rectus abdominis flap (Fig. 57.5). Additional blood supply is from the posterior perforating vessels accompanying the eighth through twelfth sensory and motor nerves. The musculocutaneous perforators that supply the flap are centered in the perumbilical area and emerge through the medial half of the rectus muscle to supply the subdermal plexus superficial to it (Fig. 57.6). Patient selection is important for this operation. Patients with an obese, pendulous abdominal panniculus, diabetics, and smokers carry a much higher risk of flap loss.







Technical steps


The indications for breast reconstruction have been liberalized as a result of increasing experience with the various procedures and recognition of the beneficial psychological effects of breast reconstruction. The most frequent reasons given for the reconstruction include: (1) to get rid of the need for an external breast prosthesis; (2) to be able to wear many different types of clothing; (3) to regain femininity; and (4) to feel whole again. The major reasons for not having reconstruction were a fear of complications and the perception of being too old for the procedure. Not surprisingly, the reconstructive cohort was the younger cohort. Clearly age and the lack of information may be significant factors in women’s reluctance to undergo breast reconstruction. The authors urge improved patient education on the risks and benefits of post-mastectomy reconstruction.


Surgical management of the breast after mastectomy/lumpectomy consists of two general kinds of procedure: (1) expander/implant reconstruction; (2) autogenous reconstruction. In consultation with the oncological surgeon and the patient, the candidacy of immediate vs. delayed reconstruction should be made with the understanding that and immediate reconstruction can turn into a delayed reconstruction on day of surgery depending on the surgical findings and sentinel lymph node status. Whatever the method chosen for the reconstruction, it must not hinder treatment of the primary cancer, since patient survival depends largely on controlling the disease at the initial episode.


The current surgical options for post-mastectomy/lumpectomy reconstruction are as follows:



Whether the reconstruction involves expander/implants or autogenous tissues, most surgeons try to preserve the inframammary fold. The IMF serves as an anatomic landmark to facilitate an aesthetic result. A histological study of inframammary folds removed at the time of mastectomy has proven to be negative for carcinoma, alleviating the fear of local recurrence at the fold. The authors conclude that preservation of the inframammary fold leaves a minimal amount of breast tissue and does not appreciably affect the completeness of mastectomy. Selection of the breast procedure is based on the considerations while evaluating the patient as described earlier. The goals are to create a breast mound while minimizing donor sites and maximizing aesthetic appearance.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 4, 2016 | Posted by in Aesthetic plastic surgery | Comments Off on Breast reconstruction

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access