Retropubic Operations for Stress Urinary Incontinence

15 Retropubic Operations for Stress Urinary Incontinence




Since 1949, when Marshall et al. first described retropubic urethrovesical suspension for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI), retropubic procedures have emerged as consistently curative. Although numerous terminologies and variations of retropubic repairs have been described, the basic goal remains the same: to suspend and to stabilize the anterior vaginal wall, and thus the bladder neck and proximal urethra, in a retropubic position. This prevents their descent and allows urethral compression against a stable suburethral layer. Selection of a retropubic approach (versus a vaginal approach) depends on many factors, such as the need for laparotomy for other pelvic disease, the amount of pelvic organ relaxation, the status of the intrinsic urethral sphincter mechanism, the age and health status of the patient, and the preference and expertise of the surgeon.


Few data differentiate one retropubic procedure from another, although all have advantages and disadvantages. Historically, the three most studied and popular retropubic procedures are the Burch colposuspension, the Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz (MMK) procedure, and the paravaginal defect repair. We no longer perform the MMK procedure, so this operation will not be described. We prefer the Burch colposuspension for urodynamic stress incontinence with bladder neck hypermobility and adequate resting urethral sphincter function and combine it with a paravaginal defect repair, when the patient has stage 2 or 3 anterior vaginal prolapse or when a concurrent sacrocolpopexy is required. The surgical techniques described herein are contemporary modifications of the original operations: Tanagho (1976) described the modified Burch colposuspension; the paravaginal defect repair was described by Richardson et al. (1981) and Shull and Baden (1989) (paravaginal repair) and by Turner-Warwick (1986) and Webster and Kreder (1990) (vaginal obturator shelf repair). Although less critically studied, the paravaginal defect repair is regionally popular and widely performed in the United States. The operations described do not represent one correct technique but a commonly used and proven method.


This chapter describes only retropubic suspension procedures that use an abdominal wall incision for direct access into the space of Retzius. The use of laparoscopy and mini-incision laparotomy to enter the retropubic space and perform these and similar procedures is expanding, both in terms of clinical experience and research. The reader is encouraged to see Chapter 17 for a thorough critique of the use of operative laparoscopy for treatment of urinary incontinence and and pelvic organ prolapse.



INDICATIONS FOR RETROPUBIC PROCEDURES


Retropubic urethrovesical suspension procedures are indicated for women with the diagnosis of urodynamic SUI and a hypermobile proximal urethra and bladder neck. These procedures yield the best results when the urethral sphincter is capable of maintaining a watertight seal at rest but cannot withstand the unequal transmission of abdominal pressure to the proximal urethra, relative to the bladder, with straining. Although retropubic procedures can be used for intrinsic sphincter deficiency with urethral hypermobility, other more obstructive operations, such as a sling, probably yield better long-term results (see Chapter 16).


To diagnose urodynamic SUI, clinical and urodynamic (simple or complex) tests must be performed to evaluate bladder filling, storage, and emptying. Clinically, the urethra is shown to be incompetent by visually observing simultaneously the loss of urine and increases in intra-abdominal pressure. Urodynamic or radiologic methods may also be used for diagnosis. Abnormalities of bladder-filling function, such as overactive bladder, can coexist with urethral sphincter incompetence in up to 30% of patients and may be associated with a lower cure rate after retropubic surgery.


Women with SUI should generally have a trial of conservative therapy before corrective surgery is offered. Conservative treatment comes in the form of pelvic muscle exercises, bladder retraining, pharmacologic therapy, functional electrical stimulation, and mechanical devices, such as pessaries. Eligible and willing postmenopausal patients with atrophic urogenital changes should be prescribed vaginal estrogen before surgery is considered.



SURGICAL TECHNIQUES



Operative Setup and General Entry into the Retropubic Space


In preparation of this technique, the patient is supine, with the legs supported in a slightly abducted position, allowing the surgeon to operate with one hand in the vagina and the other in the retropubic space. The vagina, perineum, and abdomen are sterilely prepped and draped in a fashion that permits easy access to the lower abdomen and vagina. A three-way 16- or 20-French Foley catheter with a 20- to 30-mL balloon is inserted sterilely into the bladder and kept in the sterile field. The drainage port of the catheter is left to gravity drainage, and the irrigation port is connected to sterile water, with or without blue dye. One perioperative intravenous dose of an appropriate antibiotic should be given as prophylaxis against infection.


A Pfannenstiel or Cherney incision is made. During intraperitoneal surgery, the peritoneum is opened, the surgery is completed, and the cul-de-sac is plicated, if necessary. The retropubic space is then exposed. Staying close to the back of the pubic bone, the surgeon’s hand is introduced into the retropubic space and the bladder and urethra gently moved downward. Sharp dissection is not usually necessary in primary cases. To aid visualization of the bladder, 100 mL sterile water with methylene blue or indigo carmine dye may be instilled into the bladder after the catheter drainage port is clamped.


If previous retropubic or other bladder neck suspension procedures have been performed, dense adhesions from the anterior bladder wall and urethra to the symphysis pubis are often present. These adhesions should be dissected sharply from the pubic bone until the anterior bladder wall, urethra, and vagina are free of adhesions and are mobile. If identification of the urethra or lower border of the bladder is difficult, one may perform a cystotomy, which, with a finger inside the bladder, helps define the bladder’s lower limits for easier dissection, mobilization, and elevation.



Burch Colposuspension


After the retropubic space is entered, the urethra and anterior vaginal wall are depressed. No dissection should be performed in the midline over the urethra or at the urethrovesical junction, thus protecting the delicate musculature of the urethra from surgical trauma. Attention is directed to the tissue on either side of the urethra. The surgeon’s nondominant hand is placed in the vagina, palm facing upward, with the index and middle fingers on each side of the proximal urethra. Most of the overlying fat should be cleared away, using a swab mounted on a curved forceps. This dissection is accomplished with forceful elevation of the surgeon’s vaginal finger until glistening white periurethral fascia and vaginal wall are seen (Fig. 15-1). This area is extremely vascular, with a rich, thin-walled venous plexus that should be avoided, if possible. The position of the urethra and the lower edge of the bladder is determined by palpating the Foley balloon and by partially distending the bladder to define the rounded lower margin of the bladder as it meets the anterior vaginal wall.



Once dissection lateral to the urethra is completed and vaginal mobility is judged to be adequate by using the vaginal fingers to lift the anterior vaginal wall upward and forward, sutures are placed. No. 0 or 1 delayed absorbable or nonabsorbable sutures are placed laterally as far in the anterior vaginal wall as is technically possible. We apply bilaterally two sutures of No. 0 braided polyester on an SH needle (Ethibond; Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ), using double bites for each suture. The distal suture is placed approximately 2 cm lateral to the proximal third of the urethra. The proximal suture is placed approximately 2 cm lateral to the bladder wall at or slightly proximal to the level of the urethrovesical junction. In placing the sutures, one should take a full thickness of vaginal wall, excluding the epithelium, with the needle parallel to the urethra (Fig. 15-2, inset). This maneuver is best accomplished by suturing over the surgeon’s vaginal finger at the appropriate selected sites. On each side, after the two sutures are placed, they are passed through the pectineal (Cooper’s) ligament so that all four suture ends exit above the ligament (Fig. 15-2). Before the sutures are tied, a 1 × 4 cm strip of Gelfoam may be placed between the vagina and obturator fascia below Cooper’s ligament to aid adherence and hemostasis.



As noted previously, this area is extremely vascular, and visible vessels should be avoided if possible. When excessive bleeding occurs, it can be controlled by direct pressure, sutures, or vascular clips. Less severe bleeding usually stops with direct pressure and after tying the fixation sutures.


After all four sutures are placed in the vagina and through the Cooper’s ligaments, the assistant first ties the distal sutures and then the proximal ones, while the surgeon elevates the vagina with the vaginal hand. In tying the sutures, one does not have to be concerned about whether the vaginal wall meets Cooper’s ligament, so one should not place too much tension on the vaginal wall. A suture bridge is usually found between the two points. After the sutures are tied, one can easily insert two fingers between the pubic bone and the urethra, thus preventing compression of the urethra against the pubic bone. Vaginal fixation and urethral support depend more on fibrosis and scarring of periurethral and vaginal tissues over the obturator internus and levator fascia than on the suture material itself.



Paravaginal Defect Repair


The object of the paravaginal defect repair is to reattach, bilaterally, the anterolateral vaginal sulcus with its overlying endopelvic fascia to the pubococcygeus and obturator internus muscles and fascia at the level of the arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis. The retropubic space is entered, and the bladder and vagina are depressed and pulled medially to allow visualization of the lateral retropubic space, including the obturator internus and levator muscles and the fossa containing the obturator neurovascular bundle. Blunt dissection can be carried dorsally from this point until the ischial spine is palpated. The arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis is often visualized as a white band of tissue running over the pubococcygeus and obturator internus muscles from the back of the lower edge of the symphysis pubis toward the ischial spine. A lateral paravaginal defect representing avulsion of the vagina off the arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis or of the arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis off the obturator internus muscle may be visualized (Fig. 15-3).



The surgeon’s nondominant hand is inserted into the vagina. While gently retracting medially the vagina and bladder, the surgeon elevates the anterolateral vaginal sulcus. Starting near the vaginal apex, a suture is placed, first through the full thickness of the vagina (excluding the vaginal epithelium) and then deep into the obturator internus fascia or arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis, 1 to 2 cm anterior to its origin at the ischial spine. After this first stitch is tied, additional (four or five) sutures are placed through the vaginal wall and overlying fascia and then into the obturator internus at about 1-cm intervals toward the pubic ramus (Fig. 15-3, inset). The most distal sutures should be placed as close as possible to the pubic ramus, into the pubourethral ligament; alternatively, Burch colposuspension sutures can be placed bilaterally at the level of the bladder neck and urethra if the patient has SUI. No. 2-0 or 0 nonabsorbable suture on a medium-sized, tapered needle is usually used for the paravaginal repair.


This procedure leaves free space between the symphysis pubis and the proximal urethra but secures support so that rotational descent of the proximal urethra and bladder base is prevented with sudden increases in intra-abdominal pressure. According to Turner-Warwick (1986), the procedure avoids overcorrection and fixation of the periurethral fascia, which might compromise the functional movements of the urethra and bladder base and lead to obstruction and voiding difficulty. This principle may explain why the paravaginal defect repair usually results in spontaneous voiding on the first or second postoperative day. In fact, the vaginal obturator shelf repair has been used to correct patients with dysfunctional voiding symptoms after previous retropubic surgery.




CLINICAL RESULTS


Many studies report clinical experiences with retropubic urethral suspension procedures for SUI. Although most of these studies are methodologically flawed, increasing numbers of quality studies, including prospective randomized trials, have been or are being conducted. Currently, however, few prospective studies are available comparing the results of the various procedures for urodynamic SUI.


Only a few studies have been done assessing the paravaginal defect repair for SUI. Early studies using subjective outcome measures reported that over 90% of women were continent after this procedure. However, in a prospective randomized trial, Columbo et al. (1996) found that only 61% of women were continent 3 years after a paravaginal defect repair compared with 100% of women who were continent after a Burch colposuspension. We currently believe that the paravaginal defect repair should be used for anatomic correction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse but not as primary treatment of SUI.


The Burch colposuspension is the best-studied retropubic procedure. From 1980 to 1990, at least 18 studies reported using the Burch colposuspension in women with urodynamically proved SUI with objective measures of cure. Follow-up times ranged from 3 months to 7 years. At 3 to 24 months after surgery, 59% to 100% of patients became continent, for an overall average cure rate of 84%. At 3 to 7 years, continence rates ranged from 63% to 89%, for an average rate of 77%. Although objectively incontinent, a small percentage of additional patients were judged to be improved and satisfied with their surgical results. The overall reported absolute failure rate is 13.6% at 3 to 24 months and 14% at 5 to 7 years.


In an excellent study, Eriksen et al. (1990) reported 91 women with urodynamically proved SUI, with or without bladder stability, who had undergone Burch colposuspension. Urodynamic evaluation was done on 76 patients after 5 years. Stress incontinence was cured in 71% of the patients with preoperative stable bladders and in 57% of those with stress incontinence and detrusor overactivity, a nonsignificant difference. After 5 years, only 52% of the study group was completely dry and free of complications; about 30% needed further incontinence therapy.


Several studies have been done that assessed women more than 10 years after undergoing a Burch procedure. Alcalay et al. (1995)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 11, 2016 | Posted by in Reconstructive surgery | Comments Off on Retropubic Operations for Stress Urinary Incontinence

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access