Neurotoxin: Basic Facts, Physiology and Pharmacology


Fig. 7.1

Figures for botulinum neurotoxin A procedures in the USA over the past 21 years according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons [6]



For some slightly inexplicable reason, perhaps due to its rapid growth, BoNT has acquired a certain negativity of reputation in the media that appears undeserved given its extremely good safety profile. Moreover, the majority of contemporaneous research is now directed at the validation of BoNT as therapeutic agents, rather than simple wrinkle erasers, and such uses first outweighed cosmetic, accounting for about 60% of worldwide sales, in 2004. Being such a fascinating entity, BoNT research efforts have yielded a wealth of positive spin-offs, including elucidation of neuronal transport, protein-protein interactions and transmembrane transport systems.


7.2 Basic Facts


Botulinum neurotoxin is the most acutely lethal toxin known, with an estimated human median lethal dose (LD50) of 1.3–2.1 ng/kg intravenously or intramuscularly and 10–13 ng/kg when inhaled [1].


Microbiologically, Cl. botulinum is an anaerobic, Gram-positive, spore-forming bacillus that synthesises its potent, neurologically directed exotoxin. Medical toxins are produced from this and other members of the Clostridium genus, including C. butyricum, C. baratii and C. argentinense [7]. Eight serological types (A–G) are recognised, based on the antigenic specificity of each exotoxin (Table 7.1) [8]. They share structural and functional commonalities along with amino acid sequence but act on different elements of the same target receptor. All except C2 that is, which is not neurotoxic. Fascinatingly, whilst sharing great similarity to C. tetani, the flaccid paralysis of botulinum toxins is the polar opposite to muscle spasm, which prompted the lay term ‘lockjaw’ in clinical tetanus. Serotypes A, B, H and F are the only ones with a known effect in humans, and A and B are the only forms commercially available. Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) remains the first line due to greater potency, stability and predictability [9]. Although similar in function, A and B are antigenically dissimilar, permitting those few who have developed antibody-mediated resistance to BoNT-A to continue to benefit clinically from neurotoxin treatment.


Table 7.1

Some characteristics of known botulinum neurotoxin subtypes and their molecular targets











































































Serotype


Potency


Duration


Common brands


Identified in


SHARE target


A


Highest


Longest, 4–6 months


Dysport®, Botox®, Xeomin®


Human


SNAP-25


B


1/200th A


6 weeks


NeuroBloc or Myobloc


Human


VAMP1,2 cellubrevin


C 1


1/10th A

   

Chicken


Syntaxins 1–3, SNAP-25


C 2


1/10th A

   

Chicken


Syntaxins 1–3, SNAP-25


D

     

Cattle


VAMP1,2 cellubrevin


E

     

Human


SNAP-25


F

 

4–5 weeks

 

Human


VAMP1,2 cellubrevin


G

     

Soil


VAMP1,2 cellubrevin



SNAP synaptosomal-associated protein)-25, VAMP vesicle-associated membrane protein


Biochemically, BoNT-A is a 150 kDa dimeric structure with the chemical formula C6760H10447N1743O2010S32 (Fig. 7.2) [10]. The ‘light’ is approximately half the molecular weight, at 50 kDa, and is disulphide bonded to the ‘heavy’ chain. It is this bond that is disrupted upon toxin activation to free the active, metalloprotease-containing light chain. BoNT-A exists in vivo in association with an haemagglutinin protein ‘coat’ that protects the delicate toxin from destruction in the highly acidic gastric environment upon ingestion. Genetically, BoNT genes code for 150 kDa proteins that are always adjacent to a NTNHA (non-toxic nonhaemagglutinin) gene. Possessing a very high degree of sequence homology with BoNT-A, it lacks only the metalloprotease motif [11]. Together the two structures form a hand-in-glove heterodimer that protects against chemical toxins [12] with a crystal structure as documented in the original article [13].

../images/481431_1_En_7_Chapter/481431_1_En_7_Fig2_HTML.png

Fig. 7.2

Ribbon structure of botulinum neurotoxin A, generously released into the public domain by the authors [10]


The most common clinical manifestation is food-borne botulism, a severe food poisoning resulting from the ingestion of neurotoxin-containing foods, usually subtypes A, B and E. Whilst spores are heat-resistant, permitting survival in inadequately processed foods, the toxin itself is heat-labile and easily denatured by boiling [14]. Clinical symptoms typically present 18–36 h after ingestion and include marked lassitude, weakness and vertigo, usually followed by double vision and progressive difficulty in speaking and swallowing. Difficulty in breathing, weakness of other muscles, abdominal distension and constipation are also common. A far less well-known and fortunately rare variant, infant botulism, usually occurs from soil particles or honey. It was first described nearly 50 years ago [15] and over 4000 cases are known. Symptoms include the inability to suckle, constipation and general floppiness. Management comprises supportive measures and antitoxin administration.


With approximately 700 reported global cases, the third entity, wound botulism, includes a similar symptomatology to food-borne, but without any gastrointestinal features. Formerly predominantly traumatic in aetiology, it now most often appears in IV drug abusers and has an incubation period somewhat longer at 7–14 days. Cases tend to involve subtypes BoNT-A and BoNT-B.


It is important, however, to appreciate that BoNT-A has different consequences when injected superficially and the standard vial of BoNT-A has 2 × 10−8 or 200 million times, less than the lethal dose [16].


7.3 Physiology and Pharmacology


Neuromuscular blockade was first elucidated as the mechanism of action in 1949 [17]. The resulting flaccid paralysis occurs via a complex, transmembrane inhibition of neurotransmitter (NT) release at peripheral cholinergic neuromuscular junctions. The carboxyl terminal of the ‘heavy’ chain must first bind to unmyelinated, presynaptic cholinergic neurons [18]. Rather quaintly, it has been described as a ‘chaperone’, perhaps forming a protein channel that facilitates membrane translocation of the light chain [19]. With its zinc-dependent proteolytic activity, the 50 kDa moiety specifically degrades cytosolic SNAP (synaptosomal-associated protein)-25. SNAP receptors are found on both vesicle and plasma membranes and are essential for acetylcholine release from the presynaptic terminal of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) [20].


SNARE (SNAP Attachement REceptor) is a large protein complex of at least 60 members whose primary role is in vesicle fusion via what has been termed ‘zippering’ as elegantly demonstrated by Lagow et al. Fig. 7.3 [21]. Selected SNARE proteins and known botulinum subtype targets are cross-referenced in Table 7.1 [22]. The importance of SNAP-25 as the ‘dominant negative factor’ is underlined by the fact only 10–15% cleavage is sufficient for total paralysis [23].

../images/481431_1_En_7_Chapter/481431_1_En_7_Fig3_HTML.png

Fig. 7.3

‘Zippering’ as a mechanism for exocytosis as imagined by Lagow et al. and used under the aegis of Open Access [21]


BoNT possesses a number of favourable pharmacological properties, including high potency—allowing small doses to be effective—and a limited local diffusion that depends upon volume [24]. High affinity is evidenced by minimal circulating toxin (10−12–10−14 M) during active botulism. Finally, whilst highly neuro-specific an interesting human volunteer study showed it not to be neurotoxic [25]! Even more interesting is reversibility with time. Although the chemical effect is permanent, axonal regeneration restores clinical function. Unlike most toxins, BoNTs are rare in not causing cell death [26] and extensive, long-term clinical experience has failed to demonstrate neurodegenerative sequelae [27].


As often occurs, the first product eponymises the market and Allergan’s BoNT-A, Botox® (Allergan, Marlow International, Bucks., UK: data insert [28]) removed a useful elision in the form of Botulinum Toxin from common parlance. Whilst the USA favours Botox®, Europeans have used Dysport (Ipsen Biopharm Ltd., Wrexham, UK: data insert [29]) for almost as long. Botulinum toxicity is expressed in units, e.g. BU (Botox® units) or DU (Dysport® units), and one unit equates to one LD50 by murine bioassay. A recent entrant—Xeomin (Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany: data insert [30])—comes without the complexing proteins of the other two, and there are a wealth of products originating in China and South Korea. Much research in the 2000s compared Botox® with Dysport® and each side had its proponents. No clear winner emerged and, with differing proprietary formulations, the literature suggested a conversion factor of 2.5–4 × units of Dysport® compared to Botox® [31, 32]. It is now generally accepted that protein complex dissociation is virtually instantaneous at physiological pH so reduced protein load provides a theoretical advantage. All three companies provide their BoNT-A in two volumes, the smaller being intended for single patient use.


7.4 Clinical


With BoNT-A being relatively novel in its application to migraine, its application to cutaneous wrinkle reduction has been far more extensively studied and a few of the fundamentals are worth summarising. Within 30 min of injection, the neurotoxin has diffused through the muscle and the heavy chain has become bound to the axon terminal. Following internalisation of the light chain, zinc-dependent metalloprotease-mediated degradation of cytosolic SNAP occurs to interrupt acetylcholine release from the presynaptic terminal [20]. Clinical effects therefore do not start appearing for 2–3 days. The paralytic effect of BoNT-A is known to be dose related with the peak effect being reached between 5 and 8 days [33].


Histopathological confirmation of atrophy with mild demyelination at the neuron terminal confirms the permanent nature of chemical denervation [34]. Explanation for the clinical effect wearing off after 3–6 months is provided by both synaptic switching [35] and neurogenic axonal sprouting [36]. Perhaps irksome to the uninitiated patient due to the need for repeat administration, reversibility is one of the most important facets of BoNT-A treatment. It is well to remember that any adverse effects will also wear off in time.


Covered elsewhere in greater depth, migraine continues along the serendipitous path of BoNT’s story with FDA approval in October 2010. Original credit goes to Guyuron, a plastic surgeon, who observed a link between BoNT-A administration and migraine alleviation in the mid-1990s [37]. It is not yet fully understood how botulinum toxin works in migraine, but a recent animal study suggested that botulinum toxin inhibits pain through nerve cells in the trigeminovascular system [38].


7.5 Safety and Complications


For a 70 kg adult, the LD50 (the quantity of a chemical fatal in 50% of test subjects) is estimated from primate studies at 40 μm/kg or 2800 U [39]. Given that 50–100 U and 300–600 U are used for cosmetic and medical indications, respectively, safety margins are comfortably wide. Adverse effects of BoNT-A are largely predictable and stem from either an unintended effect of the neurotoxin itself or an allergic reaction to the protein structure. Being rare the latter has been downgraded so egg allergy is now not an absolute contraindication. By 1989 Scott concluded complications to be ‘rare, mild and treatable’ in the main [40]. Alastair Carruthers, one of the original gurus, felt there were really only two significant complications of correct neurotoxin administration: headaches and eyelid ptosis [41]. The former tend to diminish with regular administration and the latter reduce in incidence with injector experience. In a meta-analysis performed in 2004, mild-to-moderate complications occurred in 25%. Whilst this may sound high, placebo treatment caused 15% and both active and placebo produced focal weaknesses that fully recovered [27].


7.5.1 Adverse Effects: Systemic


US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewed all registered serious adverse events (AE) 1989–2003 and reported 28 deaths, 4 of them children (Table 7.2) [42]. There were, however, no deaths in aesthetic application and 26 were adjudged to have some underlying systemic disease that elevated their risk. ‘Serious’ AE occurred 33 times more frequently in therapeutic situations where doses may be considerably higher [42].
Dec 23, 2019 | Posted by in Reconstructive surgery | Comments Off on Neurotoxin: Basic Facts, Physiology and Pharmacology

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access