A large list of foreign substances may penetrate the skin and induce a foreign body granulomatous reaction. These particles can enter the skin by voluntary reasons or be caused by accidental inclusion of external substances secondary to cutaneous trauma. In these cases, foreign body granulomas are formed around such disparate substances as starch, cactus bristles, wood splinters, suture material, pencil lead, artificial hair, or insect mouthparts. The purpose of this article is to update dermatologists, pathologists, and other physicians on the most recent etiopathogenesis, clinical presentations, systemic associations, evaluation, and evidence-based management concerning foreign body granulomatous reactions of skin.
Key points
- •
The essential feature of foreign body granulomas is the presence of either identifiable exogenous (foreign) material or of endogenous material that has become altered in some way so that it acts as a foreign body.
- •
Foreign substances may penetrate the skin because of voluntary reasons, such as materials used in tattoos and cosmetic implants, or involuntary reasons, such as accidental inclusion of external substances secondary to cutaneous trauma.
- •
Cosmetic fillers can induce adverse reactions that can be very difficult to treat. Each filler has specific histopathologic features that can clearly associate the filler with the subsequent skin reaction.
- •
Cutaneous granulomatous reactions to drugs and medication can occur with (1) systemic medications, such as polyvinylpyrrolidone; (2) topical application of several substances for hemostasis or cosmetic reasons; and (3) following the injection of different drugs and vaccines.
- •
The correct diagnosis of most cutaneous granulomatous reactions is usually established by histopathologic study; however, imaging techniques like sonography can sometimes be useful.
- •
Complications associated with foreign body granulomatous reactions in the skin include inflammation, infection, persistent nodule formation, and poor cosmetic result. A thorough understanding of these issues is essential to maximize a correct treatment.
Introduction
A large list of foreign substances may penetrate the skin because of both voluntary and involuntary reasons. The first group includes the particle materials used in tattoos and cosmetic fillers, whereas the second group is almost always caused by accidental inclusion of external substances secondary to cutaneous trauma. Box 1 summarizes the most common foreign body agents found in cutaneous biopsies.
Tattoo pigments
Cosmetic fillers
Collagen
Hyaluronic acid
Purified polysaccharide alginate
Hyaluronic acid + dextranomer microparticles
Poly- l -lactic acid
Calcium hydroxylapatite
Paraffin
Silicone
Polyvinylpyrrolidone
Polymethyl-methacrylate microspheres and bovine collagen
Hydroxyethylmethacrylate/ethylmethacrylate + hyaluronic acid
Polyacrylamide hydrogel
Polyalkylimide gel
Drugs and medications
Polyvinylpyrrolidone
Monsel solution
Hydroquinone
Glatiramer acetate
Phosphatidylcholine
Copolymer pentazocine
Vitamin K1
Interferon beta-1b
Interferon beta
Interferon alfa-2a
Hepatitis B vaccine
Disodium clodronate
Leuprorelin acetate
Sodium bisulfite
Anabolic corticosteroids
Zinc-containing insulin
Exenatide
Mineral, metallic, and other particles
Aluminum
Silica
Beryllium
Zirconium
Titanium
Mercury
Nickel
Other metals
Miscellaneous particles
Glass
Sutures
Fibers
Starch
Plants
Splinters
Cactus bristles
Arthropod fragments
Sea urchin spines
Food particles
Artificial hair
Histopathologically, most of these substances induce a foreign body granuloma with histiocytes (including epithelioid histiocytes), multinucleate giant cells derived from histiocytes, and variable numbers of other inflammatory cells. Multinucleate giant cells are often of foreign body type, with nuclei scattered irregularly throughout the cytoplasm; but Langhans giant cells are also seen. This foreign body granuloma involves the dermis and often extends to the subcutaneous tissue. The causative agent may or may not be birefringent when sections are examined under polarized light. Sometimes, secondary infection occurs in the preexisting foreign body granuloma.
Cutaneous foreign body granulomas may also develop secondary to endogenous material that has become altered in such a way that it is recognized as a foreign substance, as is the case of calcium deposits, urate, oxalate, keratin, and hair shafts. These endogenous materials are not included in this article. Herein, the authors focus on the most recent etiopathogenesis, clinical presentations, systemic associations, evaluation, and evidence-based management concerning cutaneous reactions to exogenous agents, with special emphasis on the microscopic morphology of the external particles, in order to specifically recognize the involved substance, something that is becoming increasingly important in case of litigation.
Concerning the pathogenesis, like other inflammatory processes, foreign body reactions are dynamic processes. It seems to be that the initial response against a foreign substance in the skin involves a neutrophilic infiltrate, which usually fails to deal with the foreign body. This neutrophilic infiltrate is later replaced by histiocytes and macrophages that engulf the foreign material. Sometimes macrophages are successful digesting the foreign body, but more often the foreign material resists degradation and remains within the cytoplasm of macrophages. Macrophages containing foreign body material within their cytoplasm are activated; they secrete different cytokines, which attract additional macrophages to the inflammatory focus. The result is the formation of a granuloma around the foreign body, which attempts to isolate the rest of the body from the sequestered indigestible material. Individual macrophages coalesce to form multinucleated foreign body giant cells, and T lymphocytes and fibroblasts are also components of the inflammatory response.
Introduction
A large list of foreign substances may penetrate the skin because of both voluntary and involuntary reasons. The first group includes the particle materials used in tattoos and cosmetic fillers, whereas the second group is almost always caused by accidental inclusion of external substances secondary to cutaneous trauma. Box 1 summarizes the most common foreign body agents found in cutaneous biopsies.
Tattoo pigments
Cosmetic fillers
Collagen
Hyaluronic acid
Purified polysaccharide alginate
Hyaluronic acid + dextranomer microparticles
Poly- l -lactic acid
Calcium hydroxylapatite
Paraffin
Silicone
Polyvinylpyrrolidone
Polymethyl-methacrylate microspheres and bovine collagen
Hydroxyethylmethacrylate/ethylmethacrylate + hyaluronic acid
Polyacrylamide hydrogel
Polyalkylimide gel
Drugs and medications
Polyvinylpyrrolidone
Monsel solution
Hydroquinone
Glatiramer acetate
Phosphatidylcholine
Copolymer pentazocine
Vitamin K1
Interferon beta-1b
Interferon beta
Interferon alfa-2a
Hepatitis B vaccine
Disodium clodronate
Leuprorelin acetate
Sodium bisulfite
Anabolic corticosteroids
Zinc-containing insulin
Exenatide
Mineral, metallic, and other particles
Aluminum
Silica
Beryllium
Zirconium
Titanium
Mercury
Nickel
Other metals
Miscellaneous particles
Glass
Sutures
Fibers
Starch
Plants
Splinters
Cactus bristles
Arthropod fragments
Sea urchin spines
Food particles
Artificial hair
Histopathologically, most of these substances induce a foreign body granuloma with histiocytes (including epithelioid histiocytes), multinucleate giant cells derived from histiocytes, and variable numbers of other inflammatory cells. Multinucleate giant cells are often of foreign body type, with nuclei scattered irregularly throughout the cytoplasm; but Langhans giant cells are also seen. This foreign body granuloma involves the dermis and often extends to the subcutaneous tissue. The causative agent may or may not be birefringent when sections are examined under polarized light. Sometimes, secondary infection occurs in the preexisting foreign body granuloma.
Cutaneous foreign body granulomas may also develop secondary to endogenous material that has become altered in such a way that it is recognized as a foreign substance, as is the case of calcium deposits, urate, oxalate, keratin, and hair shafts. These endogenous materials are not included in this article. Herein, the authors focus on the most recent etiopathogenesis, clinical presentations, systemic associations, evaluation, and evidence-based management concerning cutaneous reactions to exogenous agents, with special emphasis on the microscopic morphology of the external particles, in order to specifically recognize the involved substance, something that is becoming increasingly important in case of litigation.
Concerning the pathogenesis, like other inflammatory processes, foreign body reactions are dynamic processes. It seems to be that the initial response against a foreign substance in the skin involves a neutrophilic infiltrate, which usually fails to deal with the foreign body. This neutrophilic infiltrate is later replaced by histiocytes and macrophages that engulf the foreign material. Sometimes macrophages are successful digesting the foreign body, but more often the foreign material resists degradation and remains within the cytoplasm of macrophages. Macrophages containing foreign body material within their cytoplasm are activated; they secrete different cytokines, which attract additional macrophages to the inflammatory focus. The result is the formation of a granuloma around the foreign body, which attempts to isolate the rest of the body from the sequestered indigestible material. Individual macrophages coalesce to form multinucleated foreign body giant cells, and T lymphocytes and fibroblasts are also components of the inflammatory response.
Tattoo pigments
Tattoos are produced by the mechanical introduction of insoluble pigments into the dermis. Most tattoos have cosmetic purposes, but occasionally carbon or some other pigment is traumatically implanted in an industrial or firearm accident. In recent years, cosmetic tattooing is also used as permanent makeup in adult women for lips, eyelids, and eyebrows. Also, henna tattoos are becoming more popular, especially among teenagers ; allergic and irritant reactions have been reported, especially when henna is used in combination with other coloring agents. Box 2 summarizes the main components of the most commonly used substances for tattooing according to the wanted color.
- •
Black: coal and graphite
- •
Red: mercury salts, ferric hydrate, cadmium selenide
- •
Blue: cobalt compounds
- •
Green: chromium compounds
- •
Yellow: cadmium sulfide
- •
Purple: manganese compounds
Tattoo Complications
In recent years, the incidence of complications secondary to tattoos is becoming rarer because of better hygiene during the tattooing process and because of the declining use of strong irritant substances, such as mercury salts. However, complications of tattoos are still sporadically reported and may be grouped into several broad categories:
- •
Infections introduced at the time of tattooing
- •
Cutaneous diseases that localize in tattoos, often in a Koebner-type phenomenon
- •
Allergic reactions to the tattoo pigments
- •
Photosensitivity reactions
- •
Tumors developed on preexisting tattoos
- •
Miscellaneous reactions
Rare systemic complications described in patients with tattoos include uveitis and systemic sarcoidosis.
Diagnostic evaluation
Histopathology
Histopathologically, usually tattoo pigments are easily visualized in hematoxylin-eosin stained sections. The pigment is mostly localized around the blood vessels of the upper and mid dermis; most pigment is seen as extracellular deposits between collagen bundles, although small amounts of pigmented particles may also be visualized within the cytoplasm of macrophages. In many instances, the pigment is seen lying free in the dermis without an apparent inflammatory response ( Fig. 1 ). Often the pigment is slightly refractile but not doubly refractile. In general, traumatic implanted pigments during working or sport accidents are larger and more variable in size and shape when compared with the relative small and homogeneous size and shape of the pigment particles used in decorative tattoos. Histopathologic patterns vary according to the composition of the used pigment. Hypersensitivity reactions include the development of a diffuse lymphohistiocytic infiltrate involving the full thickness of the dermis, lichenoid reactions (which seem to be more frequent with red pigments) ( Fig. 2 ), sarcoidal granulomas, granuloma annulare–like reaction, necrobiosis lipoidica, perforating granulomatous dermatitis, vasculitis, a pseudolymphomatous pattern, and a morphealike reaction. The overlying epidermis is usually normal, although spongiosis and pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia have been described.
Imaging
Other methods, such as ultrasound scanning, optical coherence tomography (OCT), or confocal scanning laser microscopy (CLSM), can be used for diagnostic evaluation of tattoo reactions and pre-evaluation of tattoos before laser removal. Carlsen and colleagues have recently demonstrated for the first time that ultrasound, with histopathology as the comparative method, can quantify the severity of tattoo reactions and noninvasively diagnose the depth of the inflammatory process in the dermis. They proposed preoperative 20-MHz ultrasound scanning as a potentially useful method to guide therapeutic interventions by surgery and lasers. Other investigators suggest that examination by OCT and CLSM has an important future potential predicting good or poor outcome of laser removal.
Treatment
Tattoo Removal
Although tattoos were once considered to be permanent, technical and scientific progress in recent years has made it possible to remove tattoos by various treatment modalities. Contemporary technology involves the use of nonablative quality-switched lasers, which are considered to be the gold standard treatment option for the removal of unwanted tattoo ink. However, lasers may be invalidated in thick tattoo reactions and not curative as the power of the laser becomes diminutive already in the superficial dermis. In these cases, the culprit tattoo ink pigment deposited in the superficial dermis can be removed by surgery, including dermatome shaving. Topical tacrolimus has also been used successfully to treat a lichenoid tattoo reaction and etanercept to treat a granulomatous reaction. Current research in tattoo removal is focused on faster lasers and more effective targeting of tattoo pigment particles, including picosecond laser devices, multi-pass treatments, picosecond laser devices, application of imiquimod, and the use of microencapsulated tattoo ink.
Cosmetic Implants
Injection techniques with filler agents are often used in cosmetic dermatology for wrinkle treatment, correction of atrophic scars, and soft tissue augmentation. Although fillers have low intrinsic toxicity, all cosmetic implants can induce adverse reactions that have been recently reviewed. Moreover, microneedle therapy, which includes skin puncture with multiple microsized needles to promote skin rejuvenation or increase transdermal delivery of topical medications, has been reported to introduce immunogenic particles into the dermis producing local or systemic hypersensitivity reactions. Table 1 summarizes the most common fillers currently used, and they appear classified into 2 main categories:
- 1.
Transitory biodegradable or resorbable within months and years, respectively
- 2.
Permanent or nonresorbable
Category | Chemical Composition | Trademark |
---|---|---|
Resorbable within months | Bovine collagen | Zyderm, Zyplast |
Porcine collagen | Dermicol-P35 | |
Human-derived collagen | Autologen, Cosmoderm, Cosmoplast, Cymetra | |
Hyaluronic acid | Hylaform, Restylane, Juvederm, Perlane, Macrolane | |
Purified polysaccharide alginate | Novabel | |
Resorbable within years | Hyaluronic acid + dextranomer microparticles | Matridex, Reviderm Intra |
Poly- l -lactic acid microspheres + sodium carboxymethylcellulose, nonpyrogenic mannitol, sterile water | Sculptra, New Fill | |
Calcium hydroxylapatite + carboxymethylcellulose and glycerin | Radiance, Radiesse | |
Permanent | Paraffin | — |
Silicone oil | Silikon 1000, Silskin | |
Silicone gel | MDX 4-4011 | |
Silicone elastomer particles + polyvinylpyrrolidone | Bioplastique | |
Polymethyl-methacrylate microspheres and bovine collagen | Artecoll, Arteplast, Artefill | |
Hydroxyethylmethacrylate/ethylmethacrylate fragments and hyaluronic acid | DermaLive, DermaDeep | |
Polyacrylamide hydrogel | Aquamid, Interfall, OutLine, Royamid, Formacryl, Argiform, Amazing gel, Bio-Formacryl, Kosmogel | |
Polyalkylimide gel | Bio-Alcamid | |
Polyvinylhydroxide microspheres + polyacrylamide gel | Evolution |
Agents that are degraded within months, such as collagen, hyaluronic acid (HA), and agarose gel, may induce severe complications; but these will in general disappear spontaneously in a variable period of time. All other fillers can give rise to severe adverse reactions ( Fig. 3 ), and these show little or no tendency to spontaneous improvement.
Diagnostic evaluation
Although the incidence of cosmetic filler injections is increasing worldwide, neither exact details of the procedure nor the agent used are always reported or remembered by patients. Thus, the availability of a precise diagnostic tool to detect cutaneous filler deposits could help clarify the association between the procedure and the underlying pathology. In litigation cases, dermatopathologic evaluation of skin specimens has been used as the most consistent proof of association between the filler and the subsequent skin reaction. The evaluation can be done because each filler has specific histopathologic features that are described in detail later. Unfortunately, patients who are subjects of cosmetic interventions try to avoid invasive procedures, such as biopsies in highly exposed areas (eg, in the face). For this reason, cutaneous sonography is also being used in the detection and identification of cosmetic filler deposits and to describe dermatologic abnormalities found associated with the presence of these agents. Wortsman and colleagues have recently studied ultrasound to accurately identify in situ a filler agent, determine the location and size of cutaneous deposits, their presence in ectopic locations, and also measure local blood flow. They concluded that no other technology currently available will provide all those parameters noninvasively and proposed ultrasound as a useful adjunct tool for further investigation into this field.
Transitory Biodegradable or Resorbable Implants
Animal collagen
Bovine collagen (BC) has been used as a transitory injectable filler to correct depressed scars, deep nasolabial folds, age-related rhytides, and soft tissue augmentation. The duration of the effect from an injection of BC is usually less than 6 months. Skin tests are required before injection of these products because 3% of the population develops a delayed hypersensitivity response. Histopathology of these hypersensitive reactions includes the formation of foreign body granulomas, palisading granulomas resembling granuloma annulare at the test site injections ( Fig. 4 A ), and cyst or abscess formation. Rare examples of disseminated and recurrent sarcoid like granulomatous panniculitis caused by BC injection have also been described. More uncommon side effects include bruising, reactivation of herpetic infection, verified bacterial infection, and local necrosis. The last one is mostly seen with BC injected at the glabellar area because of vascular interruption; injections should, thus, be avoided in this region. Histopathologically, BC appears different from human collagen (HC) because bundles of BC are thicker and show a homogeneous appearance nearly devoid of spaces between them. Furthermore, HC is birefringent under polarized light and stains green with Masson trichrome stain, whereas BC is not birefringent with polarized light and stains with a pale gray-violet color with Masson trichrome stain. The inflammatory infiltrate around the implant is denser when the BC is injected in the deep reticular dermis or partially infiltrates the subcutaneous fat, but panniculitis is not usually seen when the implant is confined to the dermis. To avoid the hypersensitive adverse reactions to BC, human-based collagen implants have been produced in recent years. No skin tests for hypersensitive reactions are required with human-derived collagen products. Local adverse reactions include bruising, erythema, and swelling at the site of injection. However, a few cases of granulomatous reactions at the injection site or at the skin test site after injection of acellular HC have also been reported.
Fillers with porcine collagen (PC) have also been used with good cosmetic results and few adverse reactions. It seems that PC does not require previous skin testing; it induces less inflammatory response than BC; histopathologic evaluation demonstrates that PC seems integrated within the host tissue, being difficult to distinguish by conventional histopathology between porcine and HC bundles (see Fig. 4 B).
Hyaluronic acid
Injections of HA gel are now used as resorbable filler for filling out wrinkles of the face, soft tissue augmentation, and correction of all types of defects, such as scars and facial lipoatrophy. The longevity of the injected gel lasts for about 6 months. HA has no organ or species specificity; thus, in theory there is no risk of an allergic reaction. Very few adverse hypersensitivity reactions secondary to injections of HA used as filler have been reported. Histopathologically, they consisted of a granulomatous foreign body reaction, with abundant multinucleated giant cells surrounding an extracellular basophilic amorphous material (see Fig. 4 C), which was the injected HA gel. Scant amounts of HA may also be seen within multinucleated giant cells. The HA stains positively for alcian blue at a pH of 2.7 and is negative when examined under polarized light. Rarely described histopathologic findings at the injection sites of HA include a prominent eosinophilic granulomatous reaction and a suppurative granuloma without evidence of infection. Sonographically, pure HA appears as scattered anechoic round structures (pseudocysts), whereas the mixed formulation (HA and lidocaine) presents pseudocysts with inner echoes (debris) and septa. The most serious complication of HA injections is the iatrogenic blindness as a direct consequence of filler embolization into the ophthalmic artery following cosmetic injections.
Purified polysaccharide alginate
Five cases of granulomatous reactions to a new resorbable filler consisting of the purified polysaccharide alginate (Novabel) have been described when injected into tear troughs and/or the dorsa of hands. No systemic complications have been described as secondary to the injections of this filler. Histopathologically, the granulomatous reaction was confined to the deep dermis and subcutaneous fat, which were involved by numerous multinucleated giant cells and histiocytes. Within this granulomatous reaction, a nonpolarizing exogenous material was identified consisting of slightly bluish deposits of variable size and shape, some of which were well delineated, others with a blurred or spiky perimeter, and frequently showed retraction in a clear vacuole (see Fig. 4 D). These particles of Novabel reacted weakly with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and alcian blue but were intensely stained with toluidine blue.
Hyaluronic acid + dextranomer microparticles
A mixture of nonanimal-stabilized HA and dextranomer microspheres (Matridex, Reviderm Intra) has also been used as a resorbable filler. Only one case of a granulomatous reaction caused by this filler has been described in the literature. Histopathology of that case demonstrated a suppurative granuloma surrounding the HA and the spherical dark bluish particles that represented the dextranomer microparticles (see Fig. 4 E).
Poly- l -lactic acid
Poly- l -lactic acid (PLLA) is a resorbable filler that has been used to correct the signs of lipoatrophy in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected patients receiving antiprotease treatment as well as for facial cosmetic augmentation. It induces tissue augmentation that lasts up to at least 24 months. This filler frequently develops nodules at the site of injection, which are palpable but generally nonvisible. Histopathology of the nodules demonstrates a foreign-body granulomatous reaction, with numerous multinucleated giant cells surrounding translucent particles of different sizes, most of them showing a fusiform, oval, or spiky shape, which are birefringent under polarized light examination (see Fig. 4 F).
Calcium hydroxylapatite
Calcium hydroxylapatite (CH) is another resorbable filler composed of CH microspheres that stimulate the endogenous production of collagen. These microspheres induce almost no foreign body reaction and they show a bluish color and a round or oval shape. When this agent is injected in the lips, it tends to be associated with a high incidence of nodules. However, in some patients, CH microspheres may induce a foreign body granulomatous reaction, and blue-gray microspheres in the extracellular matrix or within multinucleated giant cells can be seen ( Fig. 4 G). On ultrasound, CH appears as hyperechoic deposits with variable degrees of posterior acoustic shadowing.
Nonresorbable or Permanent Implants
Paraffin
Paraffin is no longer used as filler because of its frequent adverse reactions; but because it is a nonresorbable material, it is still possible to see granulomatous reactions secondary to injections performed many years ago. These granulomatous reactions, also named paraffinomas, consist histopathologically of a mostly lobular panniculitis, in which the subcutaneous fat exhibits a Swiss-cheese appearance, with cystic spaces of variable size and shape, surrounded by foamy histiocytes and multinucleated giant cells. The surrounding dermis and the connective tissue of the subcutaneous septa show considerable sclerosis. Sclerosing lipogranuloma is a specific form of paraffinoma, which results from injection of paraffin in the penis causing fibrosis and deformity of the penis body (see Fig. 4 H).
Silicone
Silicone is the most widely used filler material for soft tissue augmentation. Recently, it has also been injected as a filler to circumvent facial lipoatrophy in HIV infected patients receiving antiprotease treatment. Silicone gel is capable of migrating to distant sites, where it may give rise to an inflammatory reaction and hamper clinical diagnosis. Although in the past decade there has been considerable controversy in the literature about the relationship between systemic scleroderma and other connective tissue diseases and the use of breast implants containing silicone gel, there seems to be little scientific basis for any association between silicone breast implants and any well-defined connective tissue disease. Recently, 4 cases of a new type of adverse reaction to injected silicone simulating orofacial granulomatosis have been described. The reaction consisted of recurrent episodes of unilateral, asymmetric facial edema of the cheek. Histopathology demonstrated a granulomatous reaction around silicone particles. Histopathologic findings in local reactions to implants of silicone are variable depending mainly on the form of the injected silicone. Solid elastomer silicone induces an exuberant foreign body granulomatous reaction, whereas silicone oil and gel induce a sparser inflammatory response. Silicone particles appear as groups of round empty vacuoles of different sizes between collagen bundles or within macrophages, and the particles are not birefringent under polarized light (see Fig. 4 I). Sonographically, silicone oil appears as hyperechoic deposits snow storm with a high degree of sound scattering, similar to the pattern reported in patients with ruptured breast implants whereby the initially anechoic silicone is suddenly expelled and can freely mix and/or spread through the fat lobules of the subcutaneous tissue. Pure silicone appears anechoic when injected without pressure in the porcine skin.
Polyvinylpyrrolidone
A permanent filler, composed of particles of polymerized silicone elastomer dispersed in a carrier of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) (Bioplastique), has been recently introduced for correction of facial rhytides and lip augmentation. Granulomas secondary to this filler are uncommon but when develop consist of irregularly shaped cystic spaces containing translucent, jagged pop corn, nonbirefringent particles of varying size dispersed in a sclerotic stroma, surrounded by abundant multinucleated foreign body giant cells (see Fig. 4 J). Although the material is nonbirefringent, crystalloid particles are better seen when lowering the microscope condenser.
Polymethyl-methacrylate microspheres and bovine collagen
Another permanent biphasic filler, composed of polymethylmethacrylate microspheres suspended in a degradable BC solution as a carrier (Artecoll), is used mostly in Europe as a cosmetic microimplant for correction of facial wrinkles and furrows, perioral lines, small scars, and other subdermal defects. Because this filler contains BC, it is mandatory to perform an intradermal test before the first use of this filler. Histopathologically, adverse reactions to this filler show a nodular or diffuse granulomatous infiltrate surrounding rounded vacuoles of similar shape and size, which mimic normal adipocytes and correspond to the implanted polymethylmethacrylate microspheres (see Fig. 4 K). The microspheres may be distinguished from normal adipocytes because they are markedly homogeneous in size and shape. Recently, a study analyzed the biological behavior of Artecoll injected into the mouse ear. Histopathologic analyses of the ear, liver, and kidney were performed revealing the development of an intense granulomatous reaction of the foreign body type in the right ear, periportal and intralobular infiltrates in the liver, and interstitial nephritis and chronic pyelonephritis in the kidney. Sonographically, polymethylmethacrylate deposits at early stages are generally small (<1 cm), appearing as multiple bright hyperechoic dots producing a mini comet-tail-shaped artifact (posterior reverberance); later on (more than 6 months after injection), some of the larger filler deposits acquire posterior acoustic shadowing artifacts.
Hydroxyethylmethacrylate/ethylmethacrylate fragments and hyaluronic acid
Another permanent biphasic filler is composed of ethylmethacrylate and hydroxyethylmethacrylate particles suspended in an HA gel (Dermalive). Histopathologically, granulomatous reactions to this filler consist of nodular infiltrates of macrophages and multinucleated giant cells with numerous pseudocystic structures of different sizes and shapes containing polygonal, pink, translucent, nonbirefringent foreign bodies (see Fig. 4 L). Transepidermal elimination of the product may occur.
Polyacrylamide hydrogel
An injected hydrophilic gel of polyacrylamide (Aquamid) has been used in large quantities mostly in China, Ukraine, and the former Soviet Union for breast, buttock, and calf augmentation. More recently, it has been used in European countries for treatment of antiretroviral-related facial lipoatrophy in HIV-infected patients as well as for correction of acquired or congenital malformations with depressed skin. This permanent filler may cause nodules after the injections that frequently develop secondary localized bacterial infection. Granulomas secondary to this filler are composed of macrophages, foreign body giant cells, lymphocytes, and red cells surrounding a basophilic multivacuolated nonbirefringent material, which corresponds to the polyacrylamide hydrogel (see Fig. 4 M). This material shows some histopathologic similarity to HA, although granulomas secondary to HA usually show a less dense inflammatory infiltrate than those secondary to polyacrylamide hydrogel. Polyacrylamide hydrogel is positive with alcian blue stain, and it is not birefringent under polarizing microscopy.
Polyalkylimide gel
Bio-Alcamid is a permanent translucent gel filler made of a hydrophilic biopolymer composed of sterile water and polyalkylimide polymer. It has been used to increase volume in the cheeks in HIV-infected patients with facial lipoatrophy related to antiretroviral therapy as well as for buttock augmentation, correction of scar depressions, and posttraumatic subcutaneous atrophy. Few histopathologic studies describing the adverse reactions to this filler have been reported, and they described basophilic amorphous material corresponding to the implanted material, surrounded by epithelioid histiocytes, foreign body multinucleated giant cells, neutrophils, and red cells (see Fig. 4 N).
Granulomatous Reactions Associated with Microneedle Therapy
Microneedle therapy includes skin puncture with multiple microsized needles to promote skin rejuvenation or increase transdermal delivery of topical medications. In cosmetic practices, various nonapproved cosmeceuticals are applied before microneedling to enhance the therapeutic effects, introducing immunogenic particles into the dermis and potentiating local or systemic hypersensitivity reactions. Despite the increasing popularity of these cosmetic practices, there are few data about their safety; the use of products for intradermal injection in humans has not been regulated yet.
Soltani-Arabshahi and colleagues recently described 3 cases of facial granulomas following microneedle therapy for skin rejuvenation. Two patients had undergone microinjection of the same branded topical moisturizer (Vita C Serum) during microneedle therapy and had a positive patch test reaction to this agent. Biopsy showed foreign body–type granulomas in all cases. Treatment with topical and oral corticosteroids as well as oral tetracyclines led to partial improvement in one case and resolution in another.
Granulomatous Reactions Associated with Mesotherapy
Mesotherapy is a procedure that involves the injection of substances into the dermis and subcutaneous tissue for medical or esthetic problems. Although mesotherapy is gaining popularity in most countries, there is limited knowledge about its efficacy and safety. The products used in mesotherapy are a combination of herbal and allopathic medicines, and their mechanism of action is unknown or doubtful. Previously, it was thought that side effects of mesotherapy were limited to minor bruising. Recently, many skin reactions to mesotherapy have been reported in the literature, including atypical mycobacterial infections, urticaria, lichenoid eruptions, exacerbation of psoriasis, sporotrichosis, pigmentation problems, skin necrosis, ecchymoses, prolonged swelling and tenderness, ulceration, and hematoma formation. Cutaneous granulomatous reactions and panniculitis have also been noted.
Treatment of Complications Associated with Filler Injections
Complications associated with filler injections can be categorized as immediate-, early, or late-onset events and subcategorized into mild, moderate, and severe. A thorough understanding of these issues is essential to ensure the safe use of these soft tissue fillers and to maximize the treatment of soft tissue filler complications.
Immediate-onset complications
Immediate-onset complications include undercorrection and overcorrection, implant visibility, and vascular compromise. Venous obstruction is typically associated with shallower skin breakdown, whereas arterial occlusion may lead to sudden iatrogenic blindness and broad and deep skin loss. In the case of HA injection, firm massage can be used to disperse excessive, superficial, or unaesthetic filler placement; in some cases, hyaluronidase can also be of help. Other filling agents may require reduction of the product using several methods, including simple unroofing with a needle tip or superficial dermabrasion. Treatment of vascular occlusion should be swift and aggressive. Injection should be stopped and aspiration attempted; the area should be massaged and warm compresses applied to increase vasodilatation. Additionally, 2% nitroglycerine paste can be considered to cause further vasodilatation. The use of hyperbaric oxygen can also be considered in the case of dramatic vascular compromise and impending necrosis. Localized skin breakdown should be treated with topical or systemic antibiotics, and conservative debridement should also be performed when necessary.
Early onset complications
Early onset (3–14 days) complications include noninflammatory and inflammatory persistent nodules and angioedema. Noninflammatory nodules can be treated with observation, gentle massage, patient reassurance, and, sometimes, hyaluronidase. Inflammatory nodules can be treated with incision and drainage (with culture) and empiric treatment with a macrolide or tetracycline antibiotic (which also have antiinflammatory and immunomodulatory effects). Antibiotic treatment should be continued for a total of 4 to 6 weeks; if the inflammatory nodule persists, intralesional corticosteroids may also be used. Angioedema can be related to the material or to host factors; true immune-mediated angioedema is rare, estimated as less than 1 to 5 in 10,000, and thought to be related to protein contaminants present in the material. HA-related angioedema can be treated with hyaluronidase or removal of the HA derivative.
Delayed-onset complications
Delayed-onset (>14 days) complications include persistent erythema and telangiectasias at the site of injection that can be treated with hyaluronidase and a 532- or 1064-nm laser. However, the more problematic delayed-onset complications are inflammatory nodules, granulomas, and sterile abscesses. These complications can be managed with multidrug oral antibiotic therapy and intralesional corticosteroid injection using ultradilute solutions and treating repeatedly. Sometimes, surgical excision or destruction of the injected agent is the only therapeutic possibility, resulting in worse cosmetic results than those that were attempted to correct by filler in the first place. Anecdotic reports have described improvement of the foreign body granulomas with colchicine, laser therapy, allopurinol, cyclosporin, tacrolimus, ascomycin, and isotretinoin.