Extremity Fractures




© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017
George C. Velmahos, Elias Degiannis and Dietrich Doll (eds.)Penetrating Trauma10.1007/978-3-662-49859-0_60


60. Extremity Fractures



Jeffrey Ustin 


(1)
Division of Trauma, Burns and Critical Care, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western, Reserve University, 2500 MetroHealth Dr, Cleveland, OH 02114, USA

 



 

Jeffrey Ustin



Rates of neurovascular injury are higher in penetrating than in blunt trauma. The priorities are similar: save the patient’s life and then turn your attention to the extremity, focusing on revascularization, followed by osseous stabilization, then tissue debridement, and finally neurologic repair.


60.1 Priorities


The “life over limb” principle demands that efforts to salvage a limb must be balanced with the overall trauma burden. From the time the patient presents, start asking yourself how he or she is doing. Are there multiple other injuries? Has there been a large volume of blood loss? Is the lethal triad of hypothermia, coagulopathy, and acidemia present or incipient? Extremity injuries offer many different damage control alternatives to definitive treatment. Putting yourself and your team in a damage control mindset early on is essential.

Once immediately life-threatening injuries have been addressed, attention is turned to the limb. Any anatomic structure in the path of the penetrating instrument is in jeopardy. Your top priority is to revascularize the extremity to optimize the patient’s functional outcome and to minimize tissue loss and amputation rates. Once perfusion has been regained, limb stability is obtained. Further details regarding the sequence of these events are provided below in Operative Strategies. Next, the nonviable tissue is debrided, and finally consideration is made to repair injured nerves.


60.2 The Decision to Operate


The decision to operate can be based on the need to repair the vasculature, bones, soft tissue, or nerves. In terms of vascular injury, your physical exam is the gatekeeper to the operating room. Focus on the hard signs. As a reminder, the hard signs include an expanding or pulsatile hematoma, a thrill or bruit, loss of distal pulses, or distal ischemia. Also, measure an ankle-brachial index (ABI) or brachio-brachial index (BBI). If hard signs are not present and the ABI or BBI is >0.9, the patient does not have a surgically significant lesion and requires neither the operating room nor further workup. Most of the time, the hard signs indicate an operative vascular lesion. The exceptions to this rule are complex soft tissue injuries or blunt mechanism, which have an elevated false-positive rate on physical exam; shotgun or shrapnel wounds, which can present with multiple injuries; chronic vascular disease, in which there may be absent pulses to begin with; or thoracic outlet lesions, in which the hard signs can be hidden around the shoulder girdle. If you find hard signs of vascular injury in the setting of one of these exceptions, obtain an angiogram.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 7, 2017 | Posted by in General Surgery | Comments Off on Extremity Fractures

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access