Abnormal cutaneous effects of UVR exposure may be classified as idiopathic photodermatoses, defective DNA repair and chromosomal instability disorders, photoaggravated dermatoses, and chemical- and drug-induced photosensitivity (endogenous or exogenous).
Normal cutaneous effects of UVR exposure may be acute/subacute or chronic.
Evaluation of photodermatoses often includes:
Phototesting: use of a solar simulator (eg, an optically filtered xenon arc lamp) to calculate MEDs to UVB, UVA, and visible light.
Photoprovocation testing: exposure of one forearm to UVB light and one forearm to UVA light daily for 3 days.
Photopatch testing: placement of duplicate sets of photoallergens on the back followed by exposure of one set to UVA light.
Polymorphous light eruption (PMLE) is the most common idiopathic photodermatosis. The hypothesized pathogenesis is a delayed-type, cell-mediated (type IV) reaction to endogenous cutaneous photoinduced antigens.
Prevalence is inversely related to latitude (highest in Scandinavia). Incidence peaks in the second and third decades and there is a female predominance. PMLE is most severe during the spring and summer.
The term “hardening” refers to UVR-induced immunologic tolerance, which is likely responsible for the low prevalence of PMLE at the Equator.
UVB > UVA > visible light are triggers.
Actinic prurigo is a PMLE variant primarily in Native Americans. Incidence peaks in the first decade and there is a female predominance. Actinic prurigo is most severe during the spring and summer but may persist year-round. It is often familial, with HLA associations including -DR4 (DRB1*0401) and subtype DRB1*0407.
PMLE classically presents with pruritic erythematous papules, papulovesicles, vesicles, or plaques in sun-exposed areas within hours after light exposure. The face and other sites exposed year-round may be spared. Lesions heal without scarring.
Juvenile spring eruption is characterized by vesicles favoring the ear helices.
Actinic prurigo is characterized by pruritic erythematous papules or nodules ± hemorrhagic crusts in both sun-exposed and covered areas. Lesions heal with scarring. Cheilitis ± conjunctivitis is common.
The differential diagnosis of PMLE includes other photodermatoses and LE.
Skin biopsy may be helpful to diagnose PMLE.
Laboratory evaluation may include ANA, anti-ro/la, plasma porphyrins, and HLA-DRB1*0407.
![]() Figure 4.1. CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION: POLYMORPHOUS LIGHT ERUPTION. Characteristic features are papillary dermal edema ± epidermal spongiosis and a predominantly lymphocytic superficial and deep perivascular and periadnexal dermal infiltrate. A. Early PMLE. B. Late PMLE with marked papillary dermal edema. PMLE, polymorphous light eruption. (Histology images reprinted with permission from Elder DE, Elenitsas R, Rosenbach M, et al. Lever’s Histopathology of the Skin. 11th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2015.) |
Photoprotection is first line. In patients with severe PMLE, prophylactic nbUVB phototherapy in the spring may induce immunologic tolerance.
Topical and/or systemic corticosteroids may be helpful for acute flares. Consider hydroxychloroquine.
Actinic prurigo often resolves by adolescence, but may persist. Consider thalidomide.
Clinical clues to differentiate PMLE from LE include pruritus and shorter duration (days to weeks as compared to weeks to months).
PMLE is commonly mistaken for a “sunscreen allergy.”
When discussing photoprotection, remind patients that light may trigger PMLE through window glass.
HYDROA VACCINIFORME
Reprinted with permission from Elder DE, Elenitsas R, Rosenbach M, et al. Lever’s Histopathology of the Skin. 11th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2015.
HV is a rare idiopathic photodermatosis. It typically occurs in light skin toned children with an increased incidence and severity in boys. HV is most severe during the spring and summer. UVA light is the primary trigger. Associations include EBV infection.
HV classically presents with photodistributed macules within hours after light exposure. Lesions evolve into papules and plaques that develop umbilicated vesicles, condense into hemorrhagic crusts, and ultimately heal with varioliform scarring.
HV progresses from epidermal spongiosis to vesiculation to necrosis to scarring. A predominantly lymphocytic perivascular dermal infiltrate demonstrates positive fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for EBV RNA.
Phototesting typically demonstrates lowered MEDs to UVB and UVA light. Photoprovocation testing to UVA light is typically positive. HV-like CTCL, a type of extranodal NK/T– cell lymphoma, nasal type, is an important consideration.
Photoprotection is first line. While HV is refractory to treatment, it often resolves during adolescence or early adulthood.
CAD is a rare idiopathic photodermatosis. The hypothesized pathogenesis is a delayed-type, cell-mediated (type IV) reaction to endogenous cutaneous photoinduced antigens. CAD is most common in men over 50 years of age. UVB and UVA > visible light are triggers.
CAD classically presents with a photodistributed chronic eczematous eruption. Generalization of CAD may lead to erythroderma. Lymphadenopathy is variably present. Actinic reticuloid is a severe CAD variant with pseudolymphomatous papules and plaques.
Phototesting typically demonstrates lowered MEDs to UVB and UVA > visible light. CAD may coexist with airborne ACD (eg, sesquiterpene lactones) and photoallergic eruption/photoallergic contact dermatitis (eg, benzophenones, musk ambrette), yielding positive photopatch testing. Photoaggravated dermatoses (eg, AD) and CTCL are diagnostic considerations.
CAD self-resolves in 10% of patients over 5 years and 20% of patients over 10 years. Photoprotection is first line. Topical and/or systemic corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents may be required.
SOLAR URTICARIA
Reprinted with permission from Goodheart HP, Gonzalez ME. Goodheart’s Same-Site Differential Diagnosis: Dermatology for the Primary Health Care Provider. 2nd ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2022.
Solar urticaria is a rare idiopathic photodermatosis. The hypothesized pathogenesis is an IgE-dependent (type I) reaction to endogenous cutaneous photoinduced antigens. Solar urticaria is most common in women in the third decade. Visible > UVA > UVB light are triggers. Associations include SLE and EPP.
Solar urticaria classically presents with photodistributed urticaria ± anaphylaxis within minutes after light exposure that resolves within hours.
Solar urticaria can NOT be distinguished from other urticarias on histopathology.
Laboratory evaluation may include ANA, anti-ro/la, and plasma porphyrins. Phototesting typically demonstrates wheals within minutes to visible > UVA > UVB light.
Solar urticaria self-resolves in 15% of patients over 5 years and 25% of patients over 10 years. While photoprotection is important, sunscreens often do not provide sufficient protection against visible and UVA light. Oral nonsedating antihistamines are first line.
SPOTLIGHT ON XERODERMA PIGMENTOSUM
Reprinted with permission from Krakowski AC. Procedural Pediatric Dermatology. Wolters Kluwer; 2020.
XP is classified under defective DNA repair and chromosomal instability disorders. It is due to hereditary defects in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway, which repairs UVR damage to cellular DNA (eg, posaconazolepyrimidine dimers).
XP and related disorders are summarized in Table 4.1.
XP demonstrates UVR-associated histopathological changes (eg, solar lentigines).
Photoprotection is first line.
Table 4.1. XERODERMA PIGMENTOSUM AND RELATED DISORDERS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree


