Definition
Atopic dermatitis is a pruritic, eczematous dermatitis; its symptoms chronically fluctuate with remissions and relapses. Most individuals with atopic dermatitis have atopic diathesis
Atopic diathesis: (1) personal or family history (asthma, allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis, and atopic dermatitis) and/or (2) predisposition to overproduction of immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies
Diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis
1. Pruritus
2. Typical morphology and distribution:
(1) Eczematous dermatitis
Acute lesions: erythema, exudation, papules, vesiculopapules, scales, and crusts
Chronic lesions: infiltrated erythema, lichenification, prurigo, scales, and crusts
(2) Distribution
Symmetrical
Predilection sites: forehead, periorbital area, perioral area, lips, periauricular area, neck, joint areas of limbs, and trunk
Age-related characteristics
Infantile phase: starts on the scalp and face, often spreads to the trunk and extremities
Childhood phase: neck and the flexural surfaces of the arms and legs
Adolescent and adult phase: tendency to be severe on the upper half of the body (face, neck, anterior chest, and back)
3. Chronic or chronically relapsing course (usually coexistence of old and new lesions):
More than 2 months in infancy
More than 6 months in childhood, adolescence, and adulthood
Definitive diagnosis of atopic dermatitis requires the presence of all three features without any consideration of severity. Other cases should be evaluated on the basis of the age and clinical course with the tentative diagnosis of acute or chronic, nonspecific eczema
Differential diagnosis (association may occur)
Contact dermatitis, seborrheic dermatitis, prurigo simplex, scabies, miliaria, ichthyosis, xerotic eczema, hand dermatitis (non-atopic), cutaneous lymphoma, psoriasis, immunodeficiency diseases, collagen diseases (SLE, dermatomyositis), and Netherton’s syndrome
Diagnostic aids
Family history (bronchial asthma, allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis, atopic dermatitis), personal history (bronchial asthma, allergic rhinitis, and/or conjunctivitis), follicular papules (gooseskin), elevated serum IgE level
Clinical types (not applicable to the infantile phase)
Flexural surface type; extensor surface type; dry form in childhood; head, face, neck, upper chest, and back type; prurigo type; erythroderma type; combinations of various types are common
Significant complications
Ocular complication (cataract and/or retinal detachment), especially in patients with severe facial lesions; Kaposi’s varicelliform eruption; molluscum contagiosum; and impetigo contagiosa
Eruption is symmetrically distributed and frequently develops on the forehead, periorbital area, perioral area, lips, periauricular area, neck, joint areas of limbs, and trunk. Its distribution is characterized by age. During infancy, eruption initially appears in the scalp and face, often expanding to the trunk and limbs. It appears in AD-specific sites during childhood, such as the neck and the flexural surfaces of the arms and legs. During adolescence/adulthood, it becomes marked in the upper body, including the face. AD-suspected patients are regarded as having acute or chronic eczema, and diagnoses are made based on their age and courses.
In a revision published in 2009, cutaneous lymphoma, psoriasis, immunodeficiency diseases (such as hyper-immunoglobulin E (IgE) syndrome and Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome), collagen disease (systemic lupus erythematosus and dermatomyositis), and Netherton’s syndrome were newly added as disorders to be ruled out (Table 20.1) [2]. Therefore, it is essential to differentiate these disorders and be familiar with the complications of AD.
20.1.1.2 Diagnostic Criteria by Hanifin and Rajka
The diagnostic criteria defined by Hanifin and Rajka in 1980 are frequently used worldwide [3]. One of the differences between Hanifin and Rajka’s criteria and the JDA criteria is that a personal or family history of atopic diseases (asthma, allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis, and AD) is defined as a basic feature in the former and as a diagnostic aid in the latter. However, atopic diathesis is clearly addressed in the definition of AD by the JDA (Table 20.1).
The 23 minor features listed in the Hanifin and Rajka’s criteria are characteristic for AD and often observed in this disease. However, their frequencies of development vary, and discrete expressions are used for some of the features; therefore they are excluded from the diagnostic criteria by the JDA, although some of them are referred to as diagnostic aids, clinical types, or significant complications (Table 20.1). Subsequently, an “abridged edition of Hanifin and Rajka’s diagnostic criteria” was published in 2003 [4].
20.1.1.3 Nationwide Investigation by Inquiry/Questionnaire
A questionnaire for AD diagnosis was developed in 1994 by the UK Working Party, and it has been used worldwide [5]. Its Japanese translation version has proven to be useful [6]. Furthermore, based on the questionnaire developed by the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC), global epidemiological surveys about eczema, including AD, have been conducted periodically (http://isaac.auckland.ac.nz/Index.html) [7]. Its Japanese translation version is used for epidemiological surveys [8].
20.1.2 Severity Classification
20.1.2.1 Severity Classification for the Whole Body
The classification of the severity of AD prepared by the Atopic Dermatitis Severity Classification-Reviewing Committee of the JDA is available for clinical studies because its statistical reliability and usefulness have been verified (Fig. 20.1) [2, 9]. For the severity classification, three elements of eruption (erythema/acute papules, exudation/crusts, and chronic papules/nodules/lichenification) are evaluated in the most severely affected part of each of the five body sites (head/neck, anterior trunk, posterior trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). The areas of eruption on the five body sites are also evaluated, and both scores are totalized (Fig. 20.1) (maximum score, 60). As a simple method reviewed by this committee, a method to divide the whole body into the same five sites and calculate the sum of the global assessment scores of these sites is also presented (Fig. 20.2) (maximum score, 20) [2, 10].
Fig. 20.1
Severity classification of atopic dermatitis by the Japanese Dermatological Association (Cited from ref. [2])
Fig. 20.2
Severity classification of atopic dermatitis by the Japanese Dermatological Association (simple method) (Cited from ref. [2])
In addition, as another simple method, the severity index has also been proposed by the Research Group of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (Table 20.2) [11]. Internationally, the Severity Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) (maximum score, 103) [12] established by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis or the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) (maximum score, 72) [13] in the USA is widely used.
Table 20.2
Severity index
There are several criteria proposed for severity assessment of atopic dermatitis at present that require proficiency in assessment. Accordingly, the following severity levels are defined as indices for treatment. |
Mild: Only mild rashes are observed irrespective of the area Moderate: Rashes with severe inflammation are observed in less than 10% of the body surface area Severe: Rashes with severe inflammation are observed ≥10% to <30% of the body surface area Most severe: Rashes with severe inflammation are observed ≥30% of the body surface area |
Mild rash: Lesions are seen chiefly with mild erythema, dry skin, or desquamation Rashes with severe inflammation: Lesion with erythema, papule, erosion, infiltration, lichenification, etc. |
20.1.2.2 Severity Classification Considering Clinical Course
As a severity classification considering the clinical course, the system of grading of the severity of AD published by Rajka and Langeland is frequently used [14]. Additionally, in the abovementioned ISAAC questionnaire, the question “In the last 12 months, how often, on average, have you (has your child) been kept awake at night by this itchy rash?” diagnoses patients as severe when they answer “1 or more nights per week” [7].
20.1.2.3 Evaluation of Pruritus
The visual analogue scale (VAS) is useful for evaluating pruritus [15]. In this scale, 1 point is marked on a 10-cm axis in accordance with the degree of pruritus, and the distance (mm) from the left end to the marked point is evaluated as the pruritus scale score, regarding the left end “no itch” as zero and the right end “the worst imaginable itch” as 100. As described in SCORAD (evaluated by the scale of 0–10 in SCORAD), VAS can also be used for sleep loss.
20.1.2.4 Evaluation of Quality of Life (QOL)
20.1.2.5 Severity of Eruption
The primary treatment, application of topical corticosteroid, should be determined based on “the severity of each eruption” (Tables 20.3 and 20.4) [20]. Briefly, potent topical therapy is selected to treat severe eruption even when its extent is narrow. However, it is not required for patients with mild eruption even when its area is extensive. Therefore, “the severity of each eruption” is the most important factor to consider when selecting topical therapy, and a severity assessment must be performed by physicians with dermatological skills in order to evaluate severity and predict the treatment response.
Table 20.3
Severity of eruption and topical corticosteroid application
Severity | Eruption | Topical corticosteroid application |
---|---|---|
Severe | Primarily severe swelling/edema/infiltration or erythema with lichenification, multiple papules, severe scales, crusts, vesicles, erosion, multiple excoriations, and pruriginous nodules | The use of very strong or strong-class topical corticosteroids is the first-line treatment Strongest-class topical corticosteroids are also available for refractory pruriginous nodules if sufficient effects are not achieved by applying very strong-class topical corticosteroids |
Moderate | Primarily moderate erythema, scales, a few papules, and excoriations | The use of strong- or medium-class topical corticosteroids is the first-line treatment |
Mild | Primarily dryness, mild erythema, and scales | The use of medium- or weak-class topical corticosteroids is the first-line treatment |
Slight | Primarily dryness with negligible inflammation | Topical application of medicines other than corticosteroids (emollients) |
Table 20.4
Rank of topical corticosteroids
Strongest | |
0.05% | Clobetasol propionate |
0.05% | Diflorasone diacetate |
Very strong | |
0.1% | Mometasone furoate |
0.05% | Betamethasone butyrate propionate |
0.05% | Fluocinonide |
0.064% | Betamethasone dipropionate |
0.05% | Difluprednate |
0.1% | Amcinonide |
0.1% | Diflucortolone valerate |
0.1% | Hydrocortisone butyrate propionate |
Strong | |
0.3% | Deprodone propionate |
0.1% | Dexamethasone propionate |
0.12% | Dexamethasone valerate |
0.1% | Halcinonide
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channelFull access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |