Congenital Melanocytic Nevi



Congenital Melanocytic Nevi


Harvey Chim

Arun K. Gosain



OVERVIEW

Congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) are rare pigmented lesions that are believed to form between weeks 9 and 20 of gestation. Most are sporadic, but familial association is occasionally observed. Color ranges from light to dark brown and may appear blue in more darkly pigmented individuals. Lesions have well-defined borders, but vary considerably in size, pattern, and anatomic location. Although some lesions are flat, most cause some degree of skin surface distortion.

Small nevi are defined as those <1.5 cm in largest dimension, while medium-sized nevi are those between 1.5 and 19.9 cm. Giant nevi have most commonly been defined as those that are >20 cm in greatest dimension in adulthood. Because congenital nevi enlarge with overall growth, this 20-cm figure corresponds roughly to a 9-cm scalp or a 6-cm trunk lesion in an infant.1 Other definitions relating the lesion’s size compared with body surface area define a giant nevus as one covering more than 1% total body surface area in the head and neck or 2% or more body surface area elsewhere. Giant nevi have also variously been defined as lesions larger than 100 cm2, covering more than 5% total body surface area or a lesion that cannot be excised in a single surgery. As it is more difficult to determine the size of a lesion relative to the body surface area, the majority of authors report nevus size in terms of the greatest dimension of the lesion.


EPIDEMIOLOGY

Approximately 1% of the general population is thought to have CMN, most of which are of the small variety. The incidence of giant CMN is estimated at 1 in 20,000 live births.2 The very large “bathing trunk” examples are rarer still, occurring in approximately 1 in 500,000 live births.


EMBRYOLOGY, GENETICS, AND HISTOLOGY

Congenital nevi are theorized to represent a disruption of the normal growth, development, and migration of melanoblasts. Melanoblasts migrate from the neural crest to various sites in the body, including the skin, leptomeninges, eyes, and ears between the 8th and 10th weeks of gestation. These cells subsequently differentiate into dendritic melanocytes. Abnormalities in neuroectodermal development and arrested migration or differentiation of melanoblasts result in the formation of a CMN. CMN contains nevus cells and is present at birth or, in some cases, may appear within the first year of life. Nevus cells are distinguished from melanocytes by their lack of dendrites. The genetic etiology of CMN has been hypothesized to involve hepatic growth factor/scatter factor, which is involved in the migration and development of neuroectodermal cells and found in large amounts in CMN.

Characteristic histologic features of CMN include the following: (1) nevus cells within the middle to deep reticular dermis and subcutaneous tissue or deeper structures; (2) nevus cells extending between collagen bundles in the reticular dermis (“Indian” files) and around sebaceous glands, sweat glands, and hair follicles; (3) infiltration of arrector pili muscles by nevus cells; and (4) perifollicular and perivascular distribution of nevus cells resembling an inflammatory reaction. Small CMN may demonstrate dermal, junctional, or compound nevus patterns, with some specimens indistinguishable histologically from common acquired melanocytic nevi. In a giant CMN, the morphology of nevus cells can vary and is usually more complex. Several histologic patterns have been identified, such as compound or dermal nevus, blue nevus, neural nevus, and epithelioid cell nevus.


CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS

CMN may appear initially as a hairless, pale brown flat lesion at birth, which evolves with time to develop variegation and hyperpigmentation. Dark, coarse hair may develop during the first 1 to 2 years of life. By 10 years of age, the lesions often develop a verrucous texture and become more elevated, with hypertrichosis and hyperkeratosis. Surface morphology varies widely and can be rugose, popular, pebbly, or even cerebriform appearance. Nodule formation typically represents benign neurotization in the nevus. CMN may be associated with multiple smaller satellite lesions dispersed over the trunk, extremities, or head and neck, with satellite lesions present in around 80% of giant CMN.

The most common anatomic location for a giant CMN is the posterior trunk, followed in frequency by the extremities and head and neck.3 Giant nevi may be found in specific anatomic patterns, such as the “bathing trunk” and “glove-stocking” distributions. Some interesting variants of CMN include the “kissing nevus,” occurring on adjacent aspects of the upper and lower eyelids, appearing as a single contiguous lesion when the eyelids are closed. This pattern suggests CMN development between the 9th and 20th weeks of gestation, where the eyelids are still fused.

The differential diagnosis for CMN includes other congenital pigmented lesions, such as epidermal nevus, nevus sebaceous, café au lait spot, and Mongolian spot. Other developmental anomalies may be associated with CMN, particularly of the giant size, such as spina bifida, scoliosis, elephantiasis, clubfoot, and cranial osseous hypertrophy. Patients with multiple small CMN should be distinguished from adults with multiple, acquired dysplastic nevi. This is an entirely different condition.




MANAGEMENT

The fundamental guiding principle in the management of CMN relates to achieving a balance between treatment goals, namely, elimination (or at least reduction) of the risk of malignant transformation, preservation of function, and cosmetic appearance. At the same time, the risk of anesthesia and surgery remains a consideration. The risk of melanoma in giant CMN is well established. Intervention, if performed, should be done early in life, as the risk of malignant transformation is greatest in the first decade of life.14 Some authors have even suggested starting intervention at 6 months of age, with completion of staged surgeries before school age, so as to prevent stigmata associated with CMN and reconstruction.15 No clear consensus exists for management of small and medium CMN; however, it is apparent that the risk of developing melanoma is extremely low. Hence, recommendation would be for excision if performed, around puberty, with corresponding decreased risk of anesthesia. As a caveat, often the presence and location of the anticipated scar may in fact make excision of small CMN unwarranted.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 26, 2016 | Posted by in General Surgery | Comments Off on Congenital Melanocytic Nevi

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access