Level
Issue involved
Action needed
Bureaucratic red tape
• Loopholes in schedule H permitting over-the-counter sale of TCs
Modify the schedule
• Approval of irrational drug combinations containing TCs
Ban such combinations
• Inability to stop indiscriminate sale of TCs as OTC products at chemists
Better supervision and check
Pharmaceuticals
• Marketing scientifically unethical combinations
Pressure to be brought to prevent manufacture of such combinations
• Advertisement of TC containing products as fairness creams
Boycott of such rogue companies by doctor community
Prescribers
• Dermatologists: incomplete prescriptions or counselling
Education, lectures, meetings
• Non-dermatologists: not aware of norms of TC use
Education
• Quacks: no knowledge about TCs
Education and punitive action
Chemists
• All TCs are sold as OTC products
Education supervision by drug inspectors
• Salesmen considered as medical advisors by patients
• Sell TCs of all potencies for wrong indications
• Promote TCs as fairness creams
Patients
• Apply TCs on advice of friends, neighbours or relatives
Education through counselling, brochures, social, visual and print media
• Apply TCs in diseases which are not steroid responsive or may be aggravated by TCs
• Repeat TC prescriptions indefinitely
• Apply potent TCs of all potencies for melasma
Laymen other than patients
• Misuse of TCs as fairness creams
Education through brochures, social, visual and print media
33.3.1 Dermatologists
It is obvious that dermatologists are primary stakeholders. They prescribe the steroids maximum and they know the steroids and perhaps also abuse them. Surprisingly, this has proved to be a challenge, partly because of attitude and partly because of compulsions of practices. The reasons are as follows:
- a.
Many dermatologists don’t think that this is an important area. They feel it is much ado about a small thing and there are different, more pressing areas such as leprosy, eczema, cancer, vitiligo, HIV infection, etc.
- b.
They find fixed drug combinations (FDCs) as useful tools in practice.
- c.
They feel, somewhat smugly, they can convince patients about rational use of these combinations.
- d.
They also feel that highlighting the issue will lead to steroid phobia.
- e.
Lastly, they feel they are the best judges of what they do and resent suggestions for change in practice styles.
Overcoming this can be done in different ways:
- a.
Information, education through scientific data and studies
- b.
Communication through group emails, website and posters
- c.
Discussions in conferences
- d.
Discussions in social media
- e.
Naming and shaming—though controversial, irrational prescriptions highlighted on social media may have some efficacyStay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree