Clinical Presentation of Acute Cutaneous Graft-Versus-Host Disease



Fig. 3.1
Erythema of the face with accentuation of the ear



A340255_1_En_3_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 3.2
Erythema of the ear


A340255_1_En_3_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 3.3
Palmar erythema


A340255_1_En_3_Fig4_HTML.jpg


Fig. 3.4
Palmar erythema (Note microvesicles that herald edema.)


A340255_1_En_3_Fig5_HTML.jpg


Fig. 3.5
Erythema of the palm


A340255_1_En_3_Fig6_HTML.jpg


Fig. 3.6
Patchy erythema of the trunk and arms


A340255_1_En_3_Fig7_HTML.jpg


Fig. 3.7
Confluent erythema of the back




Follicular Accentuation


Prominence of hair follicles (whether overlying erythema is present or not) is typical of aGVHD [5]. Such prominence is often misdiagnosed as folliculitis, but it typically heralds the involvement of aGVHD within the follicular epithelium (Figs. 3.8 and 3.9).

A340255_1_En_3_Fig8_HTML.jpg


Fig. 3.8
Erythema of the arm with follicular accentuation


A340255_1_En_3_Fig9_HTML.jpg


Fig. 3.9
Erythema with follicular accentuation of the leg


Morbilliform Lesions


Morbilliform aGVHD is among the most common presentations [6]. Eruptions are erythematous macules and papules that may coalesce into larger papules and plaques, which are symmetric and are often pruritic. This presentation may clinically mimic viral exanthema or drug eruptions (Figs. 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, and 3.13).

A340255_1_En_3_Fig10_HTML.jpg


Fig. 3.10
Morbilliform lesions on the dorsal forearms/hands


A340255_1_En_3_Fig11_HTML.jpg


Fig. 3.11
Morbilliform lesions on the chest and abdomen


A340255_1_En_3_Fig12_HTML.jpg


Fig. 3.12
Morbilliform lesions on the thighs


A340255_1_En_3_Fig13_HTML.jpg


Fig. 3.13
Morbilliform lesions diffusely located on the trunk


Erythroderma


Erythrodermic aGVHD presents with confluent erythematous patches that mimic severe viral exanthema, drug reactions, psoriasis, eczematous dermatitis, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, or staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS) (Fig. 3.14). When mucous membrane lesions are present, there are no clinical or histologic differences between skin stage 4 aGVHD and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) [79]. If extracutaneous features of aGVHD are present, diagnosis may be possible via tissue confirmation at involved sites. If extracutaneous features of aGVHD are absent, review of clinical symptoms and their development in relation to initiation of medications is mandatory. Viral serologies and/or quantification of viremia via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of the blood may aid in the diagnosis of an erythrodermic viral exanthem, such as those caused by HHV-6. Concurrent empiric treatment of aGVHD, viral infection, and TEN may be necessary if a clear diagnosis cannot be rendered.
Sep 3, 2017 | Posted by in Dermatology | Comments Off on Clinical Presentation of Acute Cutaneous Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access