54. Augmentation-Mastopexy



10.1055/b-0038-163178

54. Augmentation-Mastopexy

Purushottam A. Nagarkar

General Principles




  • Augmentation-mastopexy is a technique used to simultaneously correct low volume and skin excess.



  • Augmentation alone corrects relative deficiency of volume.



  • Mastopexy alone corrects relative excess of skin.



  • If volume deficiency and skin excess are significant enough that either procedure alone will result in a persistent relative mismatch, combined procedure is needed.



  • The revision rate is high (8%-20%). 1 3



  • Gonzales-Ulloa 4 described the technique in 1960, followed by Regnault 5 in 1966.



  • Surgical planning depends on relative locations of nipple and inframammary fold (IMF) (i.e., ptosis). Regnault described three categories67 (Fig. 54-1):




    • Grade I: Nipple at IMF



    • Grade II: Nipple below IMF



    • Grade III: Nipple at the lowest point on breast



  • Pseudoptosis: Nipple at or above IMF but breast parenchyma below IMF 8 (Fig. 54-2, A)



  • Glandular ptosis: Excess gland in the lower pole of the breast 8 (Fig. 54-2, B)

Fig. 54-1 Regnault classification of breast ptosis. A, Grade I. B, Grade II. C, Grade III.
Fig. 54-2 A, Pseudoptosis. B, Glandular ptosis.


Alternatives



Augmentation Alone




  • Use if skin excess is minimal: i.e., minimal gland below IMF, minimal ptosis, AND



  • Augmentation alone can provide appropriate projection and adequately correct ptosis by decreasing relative skin excess.



Mastopexy Alone




  • Use if volume deficiency is minimal, AND



  • Skin resection alone will appropriately raise the nipple position and adequately correct projection by decreasing relative volume deficiency.



Indications




  • Ptosis (skin excess) combined with significant volume deficiency



  • Periareolar mastopexy with augmentation requires 9 :




    • Nipple no more than 2 cm below the fold



    • Nipple-areola complex (NAC) at or above breast border, not pointing inferiorly



    • No more than 3-4 cm of associated breast ptosis



  • More significant ptosis will require a vertical or Wise-pattern mastopexy.



Single-Stage Versus Two-Stage Procedure


10



Single-Stage Procedure




  • Thought to be unpredictable, with higher revision rate than that of both procedures combined 11



  • One of the most common causes for malpractice claims 12



  • Contraindications 13 , 14 :




    • Constricted breast or skin deficiency



    • Unclear whether both procedures will be necessary




      • For example, no mastopexy required if patient has 13 :




        • No ptosis and no pseudoptosis (<2 cm of breast parenchyma below the IMF)



        • Alternatively, per Lee, Unger, and Adams, 15 skin stretch <4 cm and nipple-to-IMF (N-IMF) distance <10 cm



    • Significant asymmetry that is going to require an asymmetrical mastopexy for correction



    • Significant vertical skin excess that will require a large skin resection



Two-Stage Procedure




  • Per Lee, Unger, and Adams, 15 vertical excess >6 cm is indication for staging procedure.




    • If primary goal is ptosis correction, perform mastopexy first, and stage augmentation.



    • If primary goal is improved projection or upper pole fullness, place implant first, and stage the mastopexy.



Outcomes


(see tables 54-1 and 54-2)




  • Multiple large series have shown ~8%–20% reoperation rate for one-stage procedures. 1 3



  • Using his algorithm to select patients for two-stage procedures, Adams achieved:




    • 6.5% reoperation rate for one-stage procedures



    • 7% reoperation rate for two-stage procedures

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 18, 2020 | Posted by in Aesthetic plastic surgery | Comments Off on 54. Augmentation-Mastopexy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access