53. Mastopexy



10.1055/b-0038-163177

53. Mastopexy

Joshua Lemmon, Smita R. Ramanadham, James Christian Grotting

Natural History and Classification


1 , 2



Breast Changes: Multifactorial




  • The amount of breast parenchyma changes with age, body weight, pregnancy, and hormonal changes.




    • The skin envelope is stretched when the parenchyma enlarges.



    • Supporting ligaments and ductal structures are also stretched.



    • Ptosis results when the parenchymal volume decreases, and the skin envelope and supporting structures do not retract.




      • As a consequence, the breast assumes a lower position on the chest wall, and the youthful breast contour is lost.



Regnault Classification


1


(fig. 53-1)




  • Describes ptosis by the relative position of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) and the inframammary fold




    • Grade I ptosis (mild ptosis)




      • NAC is at the level of the inframammary fold.



    • Grade II ptosis (moderate ptosis)




      • NAC lies below the level of the inframammary fold, but remains above the most dependent part of the breast parenchyma.



    • Grade III ptosis (severe ptosis)




      • NAC lies well below the inframammary fold and at the most dependent part of the breast parenchyma along the inferior contour of the breast.



    • Pseudoptosis or glandular ptosis




      • NAC is above or at the level of the inframammary fold, but most of the breast parenchyma has descended below the level of the fold.



      • Nipple-to-inframammary fold distance has increased.

Fig. 53-1 Regnault classification of breast ptosis. A, Pseudoptosis. B, Grade I ptosis. C, Grade II ptosis. D, Grade III ptosis.


Indications and Contraindications


3 5



Indications




  • Women who desire an improvement in breast contour without a change in volume



  • Women who seek a more lifted, “perky,” youthful breast appearance and aim to correct upper pole deflation, ptosis of the areolar complex and breast tissue, and laxity of skin envelope



Contraindications




  • Active smoking



  • Women who desire volume change



Preoperative Evaluation


2 , 6



History




  • Age: Involution of breast after menopause



  • Breast history: Lactation, pregnancy changes, size changes with weight loss/gain, tumors, previous procedures, family history of breast cancer, recent mammogram



  • Patient goals



  • Medications, including psychotropic, oral contraceptive, and hormone replacement 6



Measurements




  • Sternal notch-to-nipple distance: Allows detection of asymmetry in nipple position



  • Nipple-to-inframammary fold distance: A measurement of the redundancy of the lower pole skin envelope



  • Classification of ptosis severity (see Fig. 53-1)



Other Considerations




  • Breast position on chest wall: Patients with low breast position without significant ptosis will not benefit from mastopexy. 7



  • Skin quality and amount: Presence of striae reflects the inelastic quality of affected skin; degree of skin laxity



  • Parenchymal quality: Fatty, fibrous, or glandular parenchyma and overall volume



  • Areolar shape and size: Areola are often stretched and large with asymmetries.



Photographs




  • AP, lateral, and oblique photographs should be obtained (see Chapter 3).



Patient Expectations




  • Breast size




    • Mastopexy techniques combine small amounts of parenchymal resection (<300 g traditionally in literature 3 ) and redistribution with reduction of the skin envelope — this can result in a reduction in breast size.




      • Average decrease of one cup size postoperatively: Important in patient counseling. 3



    • Many patients desire restoration of upper pole fullness, which may necessitate the placement of an implant simultaneously.




      • Mastopexy, augmentation-mastopexy, and reduction all increased breast and upper pole projection with significantly greater boost when implants were combined with mastopexy. 8



    • Volume-deficient patients may often require augmentation-mastopexy as well 7 (see Chapter 54).



  • Scar position




    • Mastopexy procedures trade scars for improved contour.



    • Patients should be informed in detail preoperatively about scar placement and scar quality.



  • Other considerations




    • Thorough patient education regarding procedural complications, use of drains, and recurrence of ptosis are essential components of preoperative preparation.



Informed Consent


Recommend items to be included in the informed consent:




  • A general description of the procedure and location of incisions and the potential need for placement of drains



  • A sufficient description of potential risks




    • Bleeding and hematoma



    • Infection



    • Delayed healing and wound separation



    • Change in nipple and skin sensation



    • Potential changes in breast-feeding



    • Asymmetry and poor cosmetic result



    • Poor scar quality



Tip:


Postoperative scars are a frequent source of litigation; therefore they are an essential component of the informed consent process. However, breast shape should not be compromised to reduce the scar burden.



Mastopexy Techniques




  • Historically, mastopexy was based on primary skin excision; however, since the mid-1990s, internal shaping of tissue using various supportive materials or parenchymal pillars has also been emphasized. 4



  • Technique depends on degree of ptosis.



Periareolar Techniques



General




  • Incisions are made and closed around the areola.



  • Scars are therefore camouflaged at the areolar-skin junction.



Patient Selection




  • Useful with mild and moderate ptosis



  • Skin quality should be reasonable without striae, and parenchyma should be fibrous or glandular.



Techniques




  • Simple periareolar deepithelialization and closure




    • Breast parenchyma is not repositioned; therefore only useful with mild ptosis



    • Permits nipple repositioning



    • Limited ellipitical techniques can elevate the NAC approximately 1-2 cm. 2



  • Benelli technique 9 (Fig. 53-2)




    • A periareolar technique that can be applied to patients with larger degrees of breast ptosis



    • Allows parenchymal repositioning



    • Areolar sizers are used to mark the new areolar diameter, and a wider ellipse is marked to reposition the NAC and resect redundant skin envelope.



    • Undermining separates the breast gland from the overlying skin.



    • The breast parenchyma is then incised leaving the NAC on a superior pedicle.



    • Medial and lateral parenchymal flaps are mobilized and crossed or invaginated in the midline, narrowing the breast width and coning the breast shape.



    • The periareolar incision is closed in a purse-string fashion with permanent suture.



  • Other periareolar techniques




    • Variations on the technique discussed above include use of mesh to support the parenchyma 10 or routine use of breast implants to reduce the amount of skin resection required. 11 , 12

Fig. 53-2 Benelli periareolar mastopexy. Markings, undermining, and parenchymal coning.


Advantages




  • Short scar



  • Scar position camouflaged at border of pigmented areola and nonpigmented skin



Disadvantages




  • Scar and areolar widening occur frequently.



  • Breast projection can be flattened.



  • Purse-string closure results in skin pleating that takes several months to resolve.



Senior Author Tip:


If periareolar purse-string suture remains palpable, it can be removed in a simple office-based procedure after 6 weeks.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 18, 2020 | Posted by in Aesthetic plastic surgery | Comments Off on 53. Mastopexy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access