Part 2Surgical and Cosmetic Dermatology
SURGICAL DERMATOLOGY
Skin cancer
Surgical margin guidelines
Tumor Type | Tumor characteristics | Excision Margin |
Melanoma (see melanoma guide pg.) | In‐situ | 0.5–1 cmor Slow Mohs |
consider SLN Bx for > 0.8 mm or ulceration | ≤1 mm1.01–2 mm>2 mm | 1 cm1–2 cm2 cm |
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) | Low risk BCC Well‐defined borders Small size Area L < 20 mm Area M < 10 mm Area H < 6 mm Nodular or superficial subtype Primary tumor | 3–4 mm |
High Risk BCC Poorly defined margins Larger Size Area L > 20 mm Area M > 10 mm Area H > 6 mm High risk tumor or patient features (see indication for mohs below) | Mohs or 5–10 mm | |
Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) | Low risk SCC Well‐defined borders Small size Area L < 20 mm Area M < 10 mm Area H < 6 mm Well differentiated histology Primary tumor | 4–6 mm |
High Risk SCC Poorly defined margins Larger Size Area L > 20 mm Area M > 10 mm Area H > 6 mm High risk tumor location (ear, lip) High risk tumor or patient features (see indication for mohs below) | Mohs or 6–10 mm | |
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) | NCCN favors Mohs over WLE | 2–4 cm to level of deep fascia |
Merkel Cell Carcinoma | NCCN favors WLE. Can do Mohs if it does not interfere with SNLBx | 1–2 cm to investing fascia layerAdvised SLNBx. |
Source: Adapted from Nahhas AF et al. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2017 Apr; 10(4):37–46. Huang C and Boyce SM. Surgical margins of excision for basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2004; 23:167–173.
Indication for Mohs micrographic surgery
Adapted from Ad Hoc Task Force, et al. AAD/ACMS/ASDSA/ASMS 2012 appropriate use criteria for Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 67:531.
Location
- High risk/area “H”: “mask” areas of face (central aspect of face, eyelids [including inner/outer canthi], eyebrows, nose, lips [cutaneous/mucosal/vermillion], chin, ear and periauricular skin/sulci, temple), genitalia (including perineal and perianal), hands, feet, nail units, ankles, and nipples/areola.
Moderate risk/area “M”: cheeks, forehead, scalp, neck, jawline, and pretibial surface.
- Low risk/area “L”: trunk and extremities (excluding pretibial surface, hands, feet, nail units, and ankles).
High‐risk tumor features
- Recurrence/incomplete prior excision
- Aggressive features (high risk of recurrence):
- BCC: with morpheaform, fibrosing, sclerosing, infiltrating, micronodular, or metatypical/keratotic type.
- Size: Area L > 20 mm; Area M > 10 mm; Area H > 6 mm
- SCC with sclerosing, basosquamous, small cell, poorly/undifferentiated, spindle cell, pageotid, infiltrating, keratoacanthoma on the face, single cell, clear cell, lymphoepithelial, sarcomatoid, Breslow depth 2 mm or greater, and Clark’s level IV or greater
- Perivascular/perineural invasion
- Other tumors: adenocystic carcinoma, adnexal carcinoma, apocrine/eccrine carcinoma, atypical fibroxanthoma, DFSP, extramammary paget disease, leiomyosarcoma, merkel cell carcinoma, and malignant fibrous histiocytoma
- BCC: with morpheaform, fibrosing, sclerosing, infiltrating, micronodular, or metatypical/keratotic type.
High‐risk patient features
- Immunocompromised (IC): transplant recipient, HIV, hematologic malignancy, or immunosuppressive medications
- Genetic syndromes: basal cell nevus, XP, and bazex syndromes
- Prior radiated skin: tumor arising in site of prior radiation treatment
- Patient with history of aggressive skin cancer with no known risk factors
Melanoma ‐ AJCC TNM classification
Major changes in AJCC eighth edition
- Round to 0.1 mm decimal for tumor depth
- Changes to T1a and T1b to 0.8 mm threshold
- Removal of mitotic rate for T category (recorded but not impacting T category)
- N category – “microscopic” vs. “macroscopic” redefined as “clinically occult” and “clinically apparent”.
- Pregnostic stage III subgroup changed (increased to IIIA–IIID)
- N subcategories revised based on number of tumor involved lymph nodes
- M1 categories changed – LDH no longer upstage to M1c, additional of CNS metastases to M1d.
Tips:
- 0.8–1.0 mm = T1b or Stage IB
- Nodal involvement → at least stage III
- Distant mets → stage IV
T classification
Tx | 1° tumor cannot be assessed | |
T0 | No evidence of 1° tumor | |
Tis | Melanoma in situ | |
T1 | ≤1.0 mm | a: <0.8 mm with no ulcerationb: 0.8–1.0 mm with no ulcerationor <1.0 mm with ulceration |
T2 | 1.0–2.0 mm | a: no ulcerationb: + ulceration |
T3 | 2.0–4.0 mm | a: no ulcerationb: + ulceration |
T4 | >4.0 mm | a: no ulcerationb: + ulceration |
N classification
Survival % | ||||
5 yr | 10 yr | |||
Nx | Nodes cannot be assessed/not performed | |||
N0 | No regional lymphadenopathy/metastases detected | |||
N1 | 1 node | a: no MSI, node clinically occultb: no MSI, node clinically detected | 8476 | 7571 |
0 node | c: MSI present | 81 | 75 | |
N2 | 2–3 nodes | a: no MSI, node clinically occultb: no MSI, node clinically detected | 7971 | 7171 |
1 node | c: MSI present, node detectable or occult | 69 | 59 | |
N3 | 4+ nodes | a: no MSI, node all clinically occultb: no MSI, >1 node clinically detected or matted | 6064 | 4657 |
2+ more nodes | c: MSI present, node clinically detectable or occult | 52 | 43 | |
Microsatellite instability (MSI) = any in‐transit, satellite, locally recurrent, or microsatellite metastases |
M classification
M | Site | Serum LDH |
Mx | Distant mets cannot be assessed | N/A |
M0 | No distant mets | N/A |
M1a | Distant skin, soft tissue including muscle, and/or nonregional lymph node | (0) Normal(1) Elevated |
M1b | Lung mets | (0) Normal(1) Elevated |
M1c | Non‐CNS visceral mets | (0) Normal(1) Elevated |
M1d | CNS mets | (0) Normal(1) Elevated |
Adapted from AJCC Cancer Staging manual, Eighth Edition (2017). Balch CM et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:6199–6206. Gershenwald JE et al. Melanoma staging: evidence‐based changes in the American Joint Committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:472–492.
Clark level
Level I | Confined to the epidermis (MIS) |
Level II | Invasion past basement membrane into the papillary dermis |
Level III | Tumor filling papillary dermis to the junction of the superficial reticular dermis |
Level IV | Invasion into the reticular dermis |
Level V | Invasion into the subcutaneous tissue |
Clark level is no longer recommended as a staging criterion and is used for staging tumors ≤1 mm2 only if mitotic rate cannot be determined.
Breslow depth
Breslow tumor thickness is measured in mm from the top of the granular layer of the epidermis (or the base of an ulcer) to the deepest point of tumor invasion using an ocular micrometer.
Melanoma ‐ AJCC TNM staging and survival
Clinical staging | Pathologic staging | Survival (%) | ||||||
T | N | M | T | N | M | 5 yr | 10 yr | |
IA | T1a | 0 | 0 | T1a | 0 | 0 | 99 | 98 |
IB | T1bT2a | 0 | 0 | T1bT2a | 0 | 0 | 9996 | 9692 |
IIA | T2bT3a | 0 | 0 | T2bT3a | 0 | 0 | 9394 | 8888 |
IIB | T3bT4a | 0 | 0 | T3bT4a | 0 | 0 | 8690 | 8183 |
IIC | T4b | 0 | 0 | T4b | 0 | 0 | 82 | 75 |
IIIA | Any T* | N1–3 | 0 | T1–2aT1–2a | N1aN2a | 0 | 93 | 88 |
IIIB | T0T1–2aT1–2aT2b–3a | N1b–cN1b–cN2bN1a–2b | 0 | 83 | 77 | |||
IIIC | T0T0T1a–3aT3b–4aT4b | N2b–cN3b–cN2c–3cAny NN1a–2c | 0 | 69 | 60 | |||
IIID | T4b | N3a–c | 0 | 32 | 24 | |||
IV | Any T | Any N | M1 | AnyT | Any N | M1aM1bM1cM1d | 9–27 | 1636 |
Gershenwald JE et al. Melanoma staging: evidence‐based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:472–492.
*There are no Stage III subgroups in clinical staging.
Melanoma: treatment guidelines
Breslow depth (mm) | Margin (cm) | SNL* | Physical exam** | Workup*** | Adjuvant treatment |
In situ | 0.5–1 | No | q6 mo x 1 yrthen yearly |
|
— |
<1 | 1 | No* | q6–12 mo × 5 yrthen yearly |
|
— |
1.01–2.00 | 1–2 | Yes |
|
— | |
2.01–4.00 | 2 | Yes | q3–6 mo × 2 yr, q3–12 mo × 3 yr, then yearly |
| |
>4 | 2 | Yes |
| ||
Stage III SLN +, micromet | WLE (as above) | LND or clinical trial | q3–6 mo × 2 yr, q3–12 mo × 3 yr, then yearly |
|
|
Stage III Clinical + nodes, macromet | WLE | FNA or bx of + LN, then LND |
| ||
Stage III in‐transit | WLE + FNA or Bx of in‐transit lesions | Yes | q3–6 mo × 2 yr, q3–12 mo × 3 yr, then yearly |
|
|
Stage IV | FNA or bx | Yes | q3–6 mo × 3 yr, q4–12 mo × 2 yr, then yearly |
|
|
Source: Adapted from NCCN Practice Guideline in Oncology‐ v.2.2016 Melanoma.
*Sentinal lymph node should be performed at the time of Wide Local Excision. Consider in tumor <1 mm if initial bx with mitotic rate ≥1 mm2, ulceration, positive deep margin, angiolymphatic invasion, or young age. The yield and clinical significance of SLNBx in Stage IA is unknown and is generally not recommended.
**Followup: At least annual skin exam for life, educate patient in monthly self‐skin and lymph node exam. (Bichakjian et al. Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma. JAAD 2011; 65:1032–1047)
***Evaluation: Routine imaging/lab tests not recommended in Stage 0/IA disease. In Stage IB, may consider nodal basin ultrasound prior to SLNB for patients with equivocal regional lymph node physical exam (NCCN guidelines 2.2016). CT, PET, and MRI may be performed to evaluate specific sxs.
┼Regimens include dacarbazine, temozolomide, paclitaxel, vinblastine, IL‐2, IFNα‐2b, and combinations thereof (see NCCN guidelines).
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)
NCCN stratification of low versus high risk cutaneous SCC
Parameters | Low risk | High risk |
Clinical H&P | ||
Location/size (including peripheral rim of erythema) | Area L < 20 mmArea M < 10 mm | Area L ≥ 20 mmArea M ≥ 10 mmArea H |
Borders | Well defined | Poorly defined |
Primary vs. recurrent | Primary | Recurrent |
Immunosuppression | − | + |
Site of prior radiation or chronic inflammatory process | − | + |
Rapidly growing tumor | − | + |
Neurological symptoms | − | + |
Pathology | ||
Degree of differentiation | Well or moderately differentiated | Poorly differentiated |
High‐risk histological subtype | − | + |
Depth (thickness or Clark’s level) | <2 mm or I, II, III | ≥2 mm or IV, V |
Perineural, lymphatic, or vascular involvement | − | + |
Recommended TX |
|
|
Source: Adapted from National Comprehensive Cancer Network stratification of low versus high‐risk cSCC.
National Comprehensive Cancer Center. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology; Squamous Cell Carcinoma (V2.2018). 2018; www.nccn.org, 1 February 2018.
Area H = “mask areas” of face (central face, eyelids, eyebrows, periorbital, nose, lips [cutaneous and vermilion], chin, mandible, preauricular and postauricular skin/sulci, temple, and ear), genitalia, hands, and feet.
Area M = cheeks, forehead, scalp, neck, and pretibia.
Area L = trunk and extremities (excluding pretibia, hands, feet, nail units, and ankles).
High‐risk histologic subtype: Acantholytic (adenoid), adenosquamous (showing mucin production), desmoplastic, or metaplastic (carcinosarcomatous) subtypes.
SCC TNM classification: tumor classification AJCC vs BWH
BWH classification provides better prognostication in patients with localized disease (stratifies T2 into a and b)
AJCC eighth ed | Brigham and Women’s Hospital | |
Tx | 1° tumor cannot be assessed | 1° tumor cannot be assessed |
Tis/T0 | SCC in situ | SCC in situ |
T1 | <2 cm in greatest diameter with fewer than two “high‐risk” features | 0 risk factors |
T2 | 2–4 cm, or with two or more “high‐risk” features | T2a: 1 risk factorT2b: 2–3 risk factors |
T3 |
|
4 risk factors or bone invasion |
T4a | Tumor with gross cortical bone/marrow invasion | |
T4b | Tumor with skull base invasion and/or skull base foramen involvement | |
AJCC high‐risk factors:
|
BWH risk factors:
|
SCC AJCC TNM staging
T | N | M | |
0 | Tis | 0 | 0 |
I | T1 | 0 | 0 |
II | T2 | 0 | 0 |
III | T3T1–3 | 01 | 00 |
VI | T1–3Any TT4Any T | 23Any NAny N | 01 |
N1 = 1 LN+ ≤3 cm ENE−N2 = 1 LN+ ≤3 cm ipsilateral ENE+1 LN+, >3 and ≤6 cm ipsilateral ENE− or1 LN+ ≤3 cm ipsilateral ENE+≥2 LN+ all ≤6 cm ipsilateral ENE−N3 = ≥1 LN+ >6 cm ENE+1 LN+ ≤3 cm ENE+ contralateral or≥1 LN+ >3 cm ipsilateral ENE+ or ≥2 LN+, any ENE+ENE+, with extranodal extension; ENE−, without extranodal extension | M0 = no distant metsM1 = distant mets |
SCC ‐ Treatment of advanced disease
- Regional disease (in‐transit and regional LN mets) – LN dissection, adjuvant radiation ± concurrent systemic therapy
- Distal mets – Multidisciplinary approach (NCCN)
- First line: Cisplatin ± 5‐Fluorouracil
- Second line: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) inhibitors
- Monoclonal antibodies: Cetuximab, Panitumumab
- Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Erlotinib, Gefitinib
- Emerging: Checkpoint inhibitors – Anti‐PD‐1 inhibitors: Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab
Prophylactic antibiotics and antivirals
Guideline for Prophylactic antibiotics
Use of antibiotic prophylaxis for endocarditis indicated for surgical procedure on infected tissue in patients with high‐risk cardiac lesion or as detailed below
Antibiotic (trade size) | Adults | Children |
All sites except oral and groin/lower extremity: | ||
Cephalexin (500 mg, 250 mg/5 ml) | 2 g | 50 mg/kg |
Dicloxacillin (500 mg, 250 mg/5 ml) | 2 g | 50 mg/kg |
If penicillin allergic | ||
Azithromycin (250, 500 mg) | 500 mg | 15 mg/kg |
Clarithromycin (500 mg, 250 mg/5 ml) | 500 mg | 15 mg/kg |
Clindamycin (300 mg) | 600 mg | 20 mg/kg |
Oral site: | ||
Amoxicillin (500 mg, 250 mg/5 ml) | 2 g | 50 mg/kg |
If penicillin allergic | ||
Azithromycin (250, 500 mg) | 500 mg | 15 mg/kg |
Clarithromycin (500 mg, 250 mg/5 ml) | 500 mg | 15 mg/kg |
Clindamycin (300 mg) | 600 mg | 20 mg/kg |
Groin and lower extremity site | ||
Cephalexin (500 mg, 250 mg/5 ml) | 2 g | 50 mg/kg |
If penicillin allergic | ||
Trimethoprim‐Sulfamethoxazole, double strength | 1 tab | |
Levofloxacin | 500 mg |
One hour prior to surgery: (all p.o. doses).
Algorithm for antibiotic prophylaxis

Guideline for prophylactic antivirals
History of HSV infection of the orofacial area is an indication for prophylaxis for facial resurfacing, chemical peels, dermabrasion, PDT, and orofacial surgery. Treat for 7–14 days with acyclovir, valacyclovir, or famciclovir to suppress viral reactivation during reepithelialization.
Acyclovir (Zovirax) | 400 mg tid × 7–14 d |
Valacyclovir (Valtrex) | 500 mg bid × 7–14 d |
Famciclovir (Famvir) | 250 mg bid × 7–14 d |
Antiseptic scrubs
Agent | Mechanism of action | Gram + | Gram − | Mycobacteria | Viruses | Fungi | Spores | Speed of action | Residual activity | Other |
Alcohol60–95% | Denature proteins (bacterial cell wall) | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | − | Fast | None | Flammable with laser/cauteryAllow to dry on surface |
Chlorhexidine2–4% (Hibiclens) | Impairs cell membrane | +++ | ++ | + | +++ | + | − | Intermed | Excellent | Ototoxicity, keratitis, skin irritant |
Iodine 3%(Lugol) | Oxidation | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | + | Intermed | Minimal | Skin irritantInactivated by blood/sputum |
Iodophors–(Betadine)Povidone–iodine 7.5–10% | Oxidation/ substitution by free iodine: disrupts S─H and N─H bonds, C═C bonds in fatty acids | +++ | +++ | + | ++ | ++ | − | Intermed(needs to dry) | Minimal | Skin irritant (less than iodine)Inactivated by blood/sputumMay cross‐react with radiopaque iodineSurfactant + iodine = iodophor |
TechniCare PCMXChloroxylenol | Disrupts cell membrane | +++ | + | + | + | + | Unknown | Slow | Good | Addition of EDTA increases its activity against pseudomonas |
Triclosan0.2–2% | Disrupts cell wall, inhibits fatty acid synthesis, binds bacterial enoyl–acyl carrier protein reductase (ENR, fabI) | +++ | ++ | + | +++ | − | Unknown | Intermed | Good | Forms chloroform and dioxins when combined with chlorine in tap water |
Benzalkonium(Quaternary ammonium) | Dissociation of cell membranes; disrupts intermolecular interactions | ++ | + | +/− | +Lipophilic | +/− | Unknown | Slow | Good | Use only in combination with alcoholsEyedrop preservativeEasily inactivated by cotton gauze/ organic materials |
Source: Adapted from CDC. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002 Oct 25;51(RR‐16):1–48.
Anesthetics
Mechanism of action
Reversibly inhibit nerve conduction by blocking sodium ion influx into peripheral nerve cells = prevent depolarization of nerves.
Practical tips to decrease pain with injections:
The patient
- Distract, pinch the skin
- Consider topical anesthesia (i.e. LMX) prior to infiltration
The anesthetic agent
- Warming to 37–42 ºC
- Buffered lidocaine with bicarb (increase the pH 3.3 → 7.4)
Add 1 cc 8.4% NaHCO3 to 10 cc Lidocaine 1% with epi
The injection technique
- Fine needle (27, 30, or 32 gauge)
- Inject slowly
- If possible, through a dilated pore or wound edge
- Deeper injections into SQ area hurts less (go from deep subdermal to tight dermal)
- Minimize needle punctures by moving in a fan shape
- Consider nerve blocks or ring blocks
Standard formula for buffered Lidocaine
1% Lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100 000
Ingredient | Quantity |
Lidocaine 1% | 50 ml |
Sodium bicarbonate 8.4% | 5 ml |
Epinephrine 1:1000 | 0.5 ml |
Tumescent anesthesia
Lidocaine 0.05–0.1% + Epinephrine 1:1 000 000
Max Tumescent is 35–50 mg/kg
Peak Lidocaine level at 12–14 hours
Ingredient | Quantity |
Normal saline 0.9% | 1000 ml |
Lidocaine 1% | 50–100 ml |
Sodium bicarbonate 8.4% | 10 ml |
Epinephrine 1:1000 | 1 ml |
Topical anesthetic (see drug section pg 197)
EMLA cream* | lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% |
LMX | lidocaine 4 and 5% in liposomal delivery cream |
Lida‐Mantle | lidocaine 3% cream |
Topicaine | lidocaine 4% and 5% gel |
Pliaglis | lidocaine 7% and tetracaine 7% cream |
Source: Cavef et al. Arch Derm 2007;143:1074–1076.
*Risk of methemoglobinemia. Also, may create artefactual vacuolization/swelling of the upper epidermis and basal layer damage/clefting.
Pharmaceutically compounded topical anesthetic
BLT | 20% benzocaine, 6% lidocaine, 4% tetracaine |
TAC | 0.5% tetracaine, 1:2000 epineprine, 11.8% cocaine |
LET | 4% lidocaine, 1:2000 epineprine, 0.5% tetracaine |
Lasergel | 10% lidocaine, 10% tetracaine |
23/7 | 23% lidocaine, 7% tetracaine |
Adverse reaction to local anesthetics
Condition | Pulse | BP | Signs and symptoms | Management |
Vasovagal Rxn | ▼ | ▼ | Diaphoresis, hyperventilation, nausea | Trendelenburg, cool compress |
Epinephrine Rxn | ▲ | ▲ | Sweating, tachypnea, HA, palpitation | Reassurance, beta‐blocker |
Anaphylaxis | ▲ | ▼ | Tachycardia, bronchospasm | Epinephrine 1:1000 × 0.3 ml SQ. Antihistamine, airway maintenance |
Lidocaine toxicity | ||||
1–6 μg/ml | Nl | Nl | Tongue and circumoral paresthesia, metallic taste, tinnitus, lightheadedness | Observe |
6–9 μg/ml | Nl | Nl | Tremors, nausea, vomiting, hallucination, muscle fasciculations | Diazepam, airway maintenance |
9–12 μg/ml | ▼ | ▼ | Seizures, cardiopulmonary depression | Respiratory support |
>12 μg/ml | — | — | Coma, cardiopulmonary arrest | CPR/ACLS |
Source: Adapted from Snow SN and Mikhail GR. Mohs Micrographic Surgery Second Edition. Chapter 14. Table 14–3.
Local anesthetic
Generic name | Trade name | Pregnancy category† | Potency | Onset (min) | Without epinephrine | With epinephrine† | ||
Duration (min) | Max dose (mg/kg) for adults | Duration (min) | Max dose (mg/kg) for adults | |||||
Amide (“i” before – caine = amide) | ||||||||
Lidocaine | Xylocaine | B | Intermed | <2 | 30–120 | 4.5(30 cc for 70 kg) | 60–400 | 7(50 cc for 70 kg) |
Bupivacaine | Marcaine, Sensorcaine | C* | High | 2–10 | 120–240 | 2.5 | 240–480 | 3 |
Mepivacaine | Carbocaine | C* | Intermed | 3–20 | 30–120 | 6 | 60–400 | 8 |
Prilocaine | Citanest | B | Intermed | 5–6 | 30–120 | 7 | 60–400 | 10 |
Etidocaine | Duranest | B | High | 3–5 | 200 | 4.5 | 240–360 | 6.5 |
Ester | ||||||||
Procaine | Novocain | C | Low | 5 | 15–30 | 10 | 30–90 | 14 |
Chloroprocaine | Nesacaine | C | Low | 5–6 | 30–60 | 10 | — | — |
Tetracaine | Pontocaine | C | High | 7 | 120–240 | 2 | 240–480 | 2 |
Other – in patients who might be allergic to above | ||||||||
Diphenhydramine hydrochloride1% solution | B | — | 5 | 15–180 | Sedation with >25 mg (2.5 cc of 1%) | — | — | |
Normal saline with benzoyl alcohol preservative | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
†Epinephrine is pregnancy category C. Low doses (diluted 1:300,000 can be used during pregnancy)
*Bupivacaine and mepivacaine: pregnancy category C due to potential for fetal bradycardia
Metabolized by | Excretion | Allergic reaction | |
Amide | Liver p450 enzyme (caution in patients with liver disease) | Kidney | Rare, due to preservative methylparaben(if allergic: switch to preservative‐free lidocaine) |
Ester | Tissue pseudocholinesterase | Kidney | More commonDue to metabolite to PABA (p‐aminobenzoic acid)(if allergic: switch to amides) |
Nerve blocks*
Surgical Anatomy
Anatomy of the face
Cosmetic unit of the central face

From Robinson JK (ed.). Atlas of Cutaneous Surgery, first edition. WB Saunders: 1996, p. 2, figure 1.2, with permission.
Cosmetic units of the cheek

From Robinson JK (ed.). Atlas of Cutaneous Surgery, first edition. WB Saunders: 1996, p. 2, figure 1.4, with permission.
Cosmetic units of the forehead

From Robinson JK (ed.). Atlas of Cutaneous Surgery, first edition. WB Saunders: 1996, p. 2, figure 1.3, with permission.
Cosmetic units of the nose

Courtesy of Dr. Quan Vu
Anatomy of the nasal cartilage

Courtesy of Dr. Quan Vu
Anatomy of the ear

From Robinson JK (ed.). Atlas of Cutaneous Surgery, first edition. WB Saunders: 1996, p. 186, figure 3.1, with permission.
Cosmetic units of the eye

From Robinson JK (ed.). Atlas of Cutaneous Surgery, first edition. WB Saunders: 1996, p. 3, figure 1.5, with permission.
Anatomy of the eye

From Robinson JK (ed.). Atlas of Cutaneous Surgery, first edition. WB Saunders: 1996, p. 3, figure 1.5, with permission.
Danger zones in surgery

From G Bernstein. J Dermatol Surg Oncol, 1986; 12(7):725, figure 6, with permission.
- Temporal branch of CN VII:
- Most vulnerable location: mid‐zygomatic arch.
- Nerve course: Nerve exits the superior–anterior portion of the parotid gland, then courses 0.5 cm below the tragus to 1.5 cm above the lateral eyebrow. Nerve lies just beneath the skin, subcutaneous fat, and SMAS.
- Motor innervation: frontalis, upper portion of the orbicularis oculi and corrugator supercilii
- Damage: inability to raise eyebrow and wrinkle forehead. Results in a flat forehead and droopy eyebrow.
- Marginal mandibular branch of CN VII:
- Most vulnerable location: mid‐mandible 2 cm lateral to the oral commissure.
- Nerve course: Nerve exits the inferior–anterior portion of the parotid gland, then courses along the angle of the mandible across the facial artery and vein. May be 2 cm or more below the inferior edge of the mandible if the head is rotated or hyperextended. Lies beneath the skin, subcutaneous fat, and SMAS.
- Motor innervation: orbicularis oris, risorius, mentalis, and depressor muscles of the mouth.
- Damage: drooping of the mouth, inability to pull the lip laterally and inferiorly with smiling.
- Great auricular nerve (C2 and C3):
- Most vulnerable location: 6.5 cm below the external auditory canal along the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle.
- Nerve course: Nerve courses toward the lobule posterior to the external jugular vein.
- Damage: Sensory innervation, results in numbness of the inferior 2/3 of the ear and adjacent cheek and neck
- Spinal accessory nerve (CN XI):
- Most vulnerable location: Erb’s point.
- Nerve course: Nerve exits from behind the SCM at Erb’s point and courses diagonally and inferiorly across the posterior triangle. Draw a line from the angle of the jaw to the mastoid process – Erb’s point is located 6 cm vertically below the midpoint of this line at the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid (within a 2 cm area). Also may define area by drawing a line horizontally across the neck from the thyroid notch to the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid (1 cm above and 1 cm below).
- Innervation: location of the great auricular, less occipital, and spinal accessory nerve. The spinal accessory nerve innerves the trapezius muscle.Damage: winged scapula – inability to shrug the shoulder and abduct the arm.
Danger zone of the neck: Erb’s point

From RG Wheeland RG (ed.). Cutaneous Surgery, first edition. WB Saunders: 1994, p. 61, figure 5.13, with permission.
Dermatomal distribution of sensory nerves

From Leventha: Fractures, dislocations, and fracture‐dislocations of the spine. In Canale et al (eds.) Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics, tenth edition. Mosby: 2003, Figure 35.1, with permission.
Anatomy of the lower extremity venous system
Modified from Min RJ, et al. Duplex ultrasound evaluation of lower extremity venous insufficiency. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003 14: 1233–1241, with permission.
Anatomy of the great saphenous vein


Anatomy of the nail

From RK Scher and CR Daniel. Nails: Therapy, Diagnosis, Surgery, second edition. WB Saunders: 1997, p. 13–14, figures 2.1, 2.2a, 2.2b, with permission.

Cutaneous reconstruction

From Wheeland RG (ed.). Cutaneous Surgery, first edition. WB Saunders: 1994, p. 51, figure 5.6, with permission.
Undermining depths in reconstruction
Scalp | Subgaleal (relatively avascular) |
Forehead | Subgaleal (for large defects) or subcutaneous fat above frontalis fascia |
Temple/zygomatic arch | Superficial subcutaneous fat above temporal branch of facial nerve |
Mandible | Superficial subcutaneous fat above marginal mandibular branch of facial nerve |
Ear | Above perichondrium |
Lip | Above orbicularis oris |
Nose | Above perichondrium/periosteum |
Rest of face | Superficial subcutaneous fat, above the parotid duct |
Terminal hair‐bearing area | Deep to hair papillae |
Lateral neck | Superficial subcutaneous fat above spinal accessory nerve |
Trunk/extremities | Above muscular fascia |
Hands and feet | Subdermal |
Reconstruction algorithm: STAIRS

Second intention
Cosmetic result of wound healing by second intention according to anatomical site

- Ideal for
- Concave areas: Periorbital (medial canthus), temple, conchal bowl, and alar crease
- Shallow defects: i.e. shins
- Fair‐skinned patient (wound tends to heal with whiten scar)
- Poor operative candidates
- May take weeks/months to heal, so patient must be able to perform wound care
- May heal with atrophic, hypertrophic, white scar
- Can perform delayed repair/graft at 2–4 weeks
Cosmetic result of wound healing by secondary intention according to anatomical site.From Zitelli JA. Wound healing by secondary intention. JAAD 1983;9(3) 407–415; with permission
Simple linear closure
- 3–4:1 Length:width ratio
- Orient along relaxed skin tension lines (RSTLs) at junction of cosmetic subunits

RSTL on the face showing orientation of simple linear closure.

From S Burge, R Rayment. Simple Skin Surgery. Blackwell Scientific Publications: 1986; with permission.
M‐plasty
- Modification of the linear closure
- GOAL: Shortens the length of a scar

Transposition flap
- GOAL: Redistribute tension vectors
- Flap rotates about a pivotal point at the base of the pedicle and is transposed over an island of normal skin
- Pivotal restraints may limit its movement
- Wide undermining necessary to prevent pincushioning
- Common flaps: rhombic, bilobe, z‐plasty, banner, and nasolabial (melolabial)
Rhombic
- Used for small defects where adjacent tissue is available to rotate onto defect.
- Changes the tension vector along the secondary defect (perpendicular to tension across primary defect).
- Classic rhombic (Limberg) consists of parallelogram with 60º and 120º.
- Common locations: medial canthus, upper 2/3 of nose, lower eyelid, temple, and peripheral cheek.

Modifications of rhombic flaps
Webster 30º
Narrower flap, easier to close secondary defect
Less reorientation of tension vectors

Dufourmentel
Compromise between Limberg and Webster flap
Extend dotted lines then bisect them
Second incision parallel to defect midline

Bi‐rhombic flap

Bilobe
- Used for small defects 1–1.5 cm in size. Common location: lower 1/3 of nose
- Tension is shared between the secondary and tertiary defects

Zitelli modified bilobe flap
- Determine the location of standing cone, then draw ~90º (Zitelli modification) line
- First lobe is at 45º – equal or slightly smaller than defect
- Second lobe is at 90º to the standing cone
- Wide undermining in the submuscular plane to prevent trapdoor effect

Z‐plasty
- GOAL: changing the direction of a scar or to elongate a scar.
- Limbs of the Z should be equal lengths.

- The degree of the limbs determines both the direction and length of final scar.

Advancement flap
- GOAL: modification of the linear closure, with standing cones (burow triangle) displaced to a more desirable position (i.e. away from free margin).
- Tension vector remains parallel to the motion of the flap.
- Types of advancement flaps: U‐plasty, H‐plasty, burow advancement, modified crescentic advancement, O → T, and island pedicle.
U‐plasty/O → U: unilateral advancement
- Burow triangles created away from defect in one direction.
- Useful along eyebrow and helical rim.

H‐plasty/O → H: bilateral advancement
- Burow triangles created away from defect bilaterally.
- Useful if tissue reservoir is available bilaterally.

Burow’s advancement flap: unilateral advancement
- Displaces one of the standing cone to a more desirable location.
- Useful if defect is along lateral upper cutaneous lip → may displace one of the standing cone to the nasolabial folds.

Modified crescentic advancement flap: unilateral advancement
- Modification of the burow triangle.
- Crescentic standing cone removed along the flap to lengthen it.
- Eliminates the need for excision of a standing cone.

O→ T/T‐plasty/A → T: bilateral advancement
- Displaces one of the standing cone bilaterally.
- Useful adjacent to a free margin or along the junction between two cosmetic units (brow, eyelid, forehead, and lip).

V→Y advancement/Island pedicle/Kite flap
- Island of tissue detached from periphery but with underlying subcutaneous and muscular pedicle.
- Caution: no undermining to base of island – must keep flap attached to underlying pedicle to ensure good blood supply.

Interpolation flap
- GOAL: coverage of large defects requiring flap with robust blood supply.
- Commonly axial pattern flap – based on named direct cutaneous artery.
- Robust blood supply allow greater length:width ratio.
- Two‐staged procedure.
- Base is usually located at some distance from defect. Pedicle must pass over or under an intervening bridge of intact skin.
- Types of flaps: paramedian, nasolabial, and abbe.
Flap Arterial supply Defect location Pedicle division Paramedian forehead Supratrochear artery Large distal nasal defect 2–3 wk Retroauricular helical Random flap: rich vascular supply from posterior auricular, superficial temporal, and occipital branches Large helical rim defect 3 wk Nasolabial Angular artery Large ala defects 2–3 wk Abbe Superior or inferior labial artery Large lip defect 3 wk
Rotation flap
- GOAL: covering a defect when there is an abundant surrounding tissue reservoir.
- Pivotal flap with a curvilinear incision – the flap and defect form a semicircle.
- Rotates in an arc about a pivotal point near the defect.
- Distributes the tension vector along the curvilinear line.
- Common locations: scalp, lateral cheek, infraorbital, and temple.
- Types of rotation flaps: unilateral rotation, bilateral rotation (O → Z), pinwheel, dorsal nasal flap, and Tenzel/ Mustarde flaps.
Unilateral rotation flap
- Usually flap is inferiorly/laterally based to improve lymphatic drainage and decrease flap edema.
- Consider backcut to improve mobility.

O–Z plasty/bilateral rotation flap
- Useful when there is insufficient tissue reservoir for unilateral flap.
- Common location: scalp.

Dorsal nasal rotation/Reiger/Hatchet flap
- Useful for nasal defect <2.5 cm on the lower 2/3 of the nose, best if midline.
- Flap along the entire nasal dorsal.
- Undermine at the level of the perichondrium/periosteum
- Backcut in the glabella.
Mustarde/Tenzel rotation flap
- Laterally based cheek rotation flap.
- Useful for defect along supramedial cheek/lower eyelid.
- Mustarde flap mobilizes entire cheek for defect >½ of eyelid.
- Tenzel flaps mobilizes partial cheek for defect <½ eyelid.
Skin graft
- GOAL: surgical defect which cannot be closed with adjacent local skin or allowed to heal by second intention; useful for larger wounds, especially in areas that require tumor surveillance.
- Stages of skin graft
Stage Events Graft Timeline Imbibition “Ischemic period” – nutrient through osmosis (bolster improves osmosis) Dark color, edematous 24–48 h Inosculation Anastomosis of existing blood vessels Pink 48–72 h (up to 10 d) Neovascularization New capillary ingrowth to graft from wound bed Hypopigment, less edema 6–7 d - Three major types:
- Full thickness skin graft (FTSG) = epidermis + full dermis
- Split thickness skin graft (STSG) = epidermis + partial dermis
- Composite graft = skin (epidermis and dermis) + additional component (cartilage or fat)
FTSG
- Minimal contraction ~15%.
- Better cosmesis than STSG – good color, texture, and thickness match.
- Must have intact perichondrium/periosteum for survival – higher metabolic demand than STSG = higher rates of graft failure.
- Most useful for defects less than 3 cm.
- Common sites: eyelids, medial canthus, helical rim, conchal bowl, nasal tip, and digits.
- Good donor sites: preauricular/postauricular area, supraclavicular, standing cones (burow graft), conchal bowl, upper eyelid, and forehead.
STSG
- Higher risk for contraction, poor cosmesis.
- Useful for very large defects: can use fenestration/meshing to enlarge size.
- Donor site heal by second intention can be painful.
- Large grafts need to be harvested with special equipment.
- Better survival than FTSG due to low nutritional requirements
- Thin: 0.005–0.012 in.
- Medium: 0.012–0.018 in.
- Thick: 0.018–0.028 in.
Composite graft
- Less likely to contract, better cosmesis.
- Highest risks for necrosis due to avascular tissue (cartilage) and thicker graft.
- Useful when bulk and structural support is needed – i.e. nasal alar defects.
Type of graft | Nutritional needs | Risk of graft failure | Cosmesis and tissue match | Contraction risk | Durability/strength | Sensation |
FTSG | High | Higher | Good | Low | Good | Good |
STSG | Low | Lower | Poor | High | Poor | Fair |
Composite | High | Highest | Good | Low | Excellent | Fair |
Causes of graft failure
- Poor blood and nutritional supply: nicotine use, nutritional deficiency, and collagen vascular disease.
- Poor graft bed contact: graft movement (activity, trauma, and poor immobilization), hematoma, seroma.
- Infection: immunosuppression, diabetes, systemic disease, and poor wound care.
- Physician technique: incomplete defatting, high tension due to inadequate size, rough tissue handling, and excessive cautery.
Sutures
Absorbable
Material | Origin | Filament | Tensile strength 50% | Absorption | Reactivity | Degradation |
Plain gut | Animal collagen* | Twisted | 1 wk | 14–80 d | High | Proteolysis |
Fast absorbing gut | Animal collagen* | Twisted | 3–7 d | 21–42 d | High | Proteolysis |
Vicryl rapide | Polyglactin | Braided | 5 d | 42 d | Moderate | Hydrolysis |
Monocryl | Poliglecaprone | Monofil | 1 wk | 90–120 d | Low | Hydrolysis |
Chromic gut | Plain gut tanned with chromium salts | Twisted | 2–3 wk | 30–80 d | High, less than plain gut | Proteolysis |
Dexon | Polyglycolic acid | Braided | 2–3 wk | 90 d | Low | Hydrolysis |
Vicryl | Polyglactin | Braided | 3 wk | 80–90 d | Moderate | Hydrolysis |
PDS | Polydioxanone | Monofil | 4 wk | 180 d | Low | Hydrolysis |
Maxon | Polyglyconate | Monofil | 4 wk | 180 d | Very low | Hydrolysis |
*Gut made from mucosa/submucosa of sheep or beef intestine.
Nonabsorbable
Material | Origin | Filament | Tensile strength | Reactivity | Elasticity | Handling |
Silk | Silk | Braided or twisted | Low, 3–6 mo | High | InelasticSoft suture | Best |
Prolene/Surgilene | Polypropylene | Monofil | High, 2 yr | Least | Very elasticStiff suture | Fair–good |
Ethilon/Monosol/Dermalon | Nylon | Monofil | High, losing 10–20%/yr | Low | Mild elasticityStiff suture | Fair |
Surgilon/Nurolon/Mersilene | Nylon | Braided | High, Losing 10–20%/yr | Moderate | Mild elasticity | Good |
Ethibond/Dacron/Novafil | Polyester | Monofil or braided | High, Permanent | Low | Mild elasticity | Very good |
Polybutester | Monofil | High | Low | Very elastic | Very good |
Suture removal time
Area | Removal time (days) |
Face | 4–5 |
Neck | 5–7 |
Scalp | 7 |
Trunk | 7–12 |
Extremities | 10–14 |
Electrosurgery*
Modality | Terminals | Gap output | Voltage | Amperage | Capability |
Electrodessication | 1 | Markedly damped | High | Low | Superficial destruction |
Electrofulguration | 1 | Markedly damped | High | Low | Superficial destruction (Spark gap) |
Electrocoagulation | 2 | Moderately damped | Mod | Mod | Deep penetration and destruction, Good hemostasis |
Electrosection | 2 | Undamped | Low | High | Cutting |
*Electrocautery = not electrosurgery, no electric current, uses heat conduction.
Wound healing
Time | Tensile strength vs. baseline |
1 wk | 5% |
1 mo | 40% |
1 yr | 80% |
- Three phases of wound healing: Inflammatory (days) → Proliferation (weeks) → Remodeling (months)
- Platelets are the first cells to appear
- Collagen: Early in wound healing, Collagen III predominates, then later replaced by Collagen I.
Wound dressing
Type | Brand name | Composition | Absorptive | Others | Indications |
Adhesive dressing | |||||
Hydrocolloids | DuodermHydrocol | Hydrophilic base and adhesive with polyurethane | Good, absorbs water and forms gel with exudates | May leave in place 1–7 d depending on exudate | Pressure ulcers, second intention woundsWound with low‐to‐moderate exudates |
Film dressing | TegedermOp‐siteBioocclusive | Polyurethane file | None (may cause fluid collection)Gas permeable | Impermeable to bacteria | Best used in conjunction with alginate/hydrogen. Good for monitoring wounds. Lacerations/abrasions/STSG donor site |
Nonadhesive dressing | |||||
Alginates | SorbsanAlgiderm | Cellulose like polysaccharideAlginic acid | Highly | Hemostatic agent: releases Ca++ | Highly exudative woundsContraindicated for dry wounds |
Hydrogels | TegagelFlexigelCuragel | Cross‐linked polymers with up to 80–90% waterSemitransparent gel | Limited, not suitable for exudative wounds | Cooling/pain reliefUseful for dry wounds by rehydrating the area | Abrasion wounds (post laser, peels) |
Foam dressing | FlexzanAllevynAquacelKendall | Hydrophilic foam, polyurethane, silicone | Highly, gas and water permeable | Compresses chronic leg wounds, conforms to body contours | Pressure ulcer, exudative wound |
Gauze dressing | Telfa padVaseline gauze, Xeroform | Excellent | Cheap, readily available | Use to cover nonocclusive, nonadherent dressing |
Cosmetic Dermatology
Laser
Laser fundamentals: type, wavelength, depth, target and usage
Laser | Wavelength (nm) | Type | Depth(μm) | Target | Usage |
CO2 | 10 600 | IR | 20 | Water | Resurface, destruction, coagulation, cut |
Erbium: YAG | 2 940 | IR | 1 | Water | Superficial resurface, destruction |
Thulium | 1 927 | IR | 400 | Water | Nonablative fractional resurfacing |
Erbium:glass | 1 550 | IR | 400–1500 | Water | Nonablative fractional resurfacing |
Nd:YAG | 1 440, 1 450 | IR | 400–2000 | Water | Nonablative resurfacing, nonablative fractional resurfacing |
Long pulsed Nd:YAG | 1 320 | IR | 400–2000 | Water | Nonablative resurfacing |
Nd:YAG | 1 064 | IR | 1600–3000 | Mel, Hb | Deep dermal pigment, black/ blue tattoo, hair removal, non‐ablative resurface, leg veins, telangiectasia |
Diode | 800, 810, 930 | R | 1400 | Mel | Dermal pigment, hair removal, leg veins, vascular |
Q‐Switched Alexandrite | 755 | R | 1300 | Mel | Tattoo (black, blue, and green), epilation, pigmentation |
Q‐Switched Ruby | 694 | R | 1200 | Mel | Epidermal/dermal pigment, tattoo (black, blue, and green), hair removal |
Argon‐pumped dye | 630, 514, 488 | O, G, B | 600 | Hb, mel | Vascular, epidermal pigment |
Pulsed dye laser (PDL) | 585–595 | Y | 600 | Hb, mel | Vascular, hypertrophic scar |
Copper (Bromide) vapor | 578, 511 | Y, G | 400,300 | Hb, mel | Vascular, epidermal pigment |
Krypton | 568531 | YG | 400 | Hb, mel | Vascular, epidermal pigment |
Frequency‐doubled Q‐switched Nd:YAG/ KTP | 532 | G | 400 | Mel, Hb | Vascular, epidermal pigment, red tattoo |
Flash lamp pumped PDL | 510 | G | 300 | Mel, Hb | Vascular, hypertrophic scar |
Argon | 488, 514 | B | 200,300 | Mel, Hb | Vascular, epidermal pigment |
Excimer | 351, 308, 193 | UV | 0.5 | Protein | Psoriasis, vitiligo, LASIK |
Intense pulsed light (IPL) | 515–1,200 | Up to 3000 | Hb, mel | Epidermal/dermal pigment, vascular, hair removal |
IR: infrared; R: red; O: orange; Y: yellow; G: green; B: blue; UV: ultraviolet; Mel: melanin; Hb: hemoglobin; KTP: Potassium‐titanyl‐phosphate.
Laser definitions
Unit | Definition | |
Wavelength | nm | — |
Energy | J | — |
Power | W | Rate of energy delivery, laser output |
Fluence | J/cm2 | Amount of energy delivered per area |
Pulse width | sec | Duration of laser exposure |
Spot size | mm | Diameter of laser beam |
Thermal relaxation time | sec | Time needed for the heated target to cool by 50% of its peak temperature through diffusion |
Chromophore | Target of laser |
Laser principles (LASER = Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation)
- monochromatic (single wavelength)
- coherent (in phase with time and space)
- collimated (parallel waves)
Selective photothermolysis: selective heating of a target chromophore occurs:
- selected wavelength is preferentially absorbed by the target chromophore
- energy is high enough to damage the chromophore
- pulse duration of the laser is shorter than the thermal relaxation of the target


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

