15 Lipoabdominoplasty with Progressive Tension Sutures



10.1055/b-0034-80624

15 Lipoabdominoplasty with Progressive Tension Sutures

Campiglio Gianluca, Rafanelli Giorgio


Abstract


Abdominal dermolipectomy is the principal procedure in the treatment of postbariatric patients. It is usually the first procedure requested by these patients, and it can offer the greatest advantages in terms of functional recovery and aesthetic result. Our approach is similar to the one we apply in cosmetic surgery, and it is intended to obtain the best results with the least risk for complications. For this reason, wide undermining is avoided to lower the rate of seromas, hematomas, and flap necrosis. The superior abdominal flap is liposuctioned and advanced downward as a subcutaneous pedicle flap. The undermining is limited to a triangular area, with the apex at the xiphoid, to address the musculofascial problems of the abdominal wall or true hernias. To reduce the incidence of fluid collections in this area and decrease the tension on the suture line, we perform three or four rows of progressive tension sutures. The complication rate with our technique is very low. No necrosis or skin sloughing has been observed in the past 5 years, even in high-risk cases such as secondary cases, smokers, and patients with previous abdominal scars. Even if progressive tension sutures effectively reduce the dead space, we have continued the use of one or two drains. Seroma formation on the 10th to 15th postoperative day can occur and represents the most frequent complication reported in our series. Prevention and treatment of secondary pseudobursa, which is believed to be an evolution of an untreated seroma, is also reported.



Introduction


Body contouring after significant weight loss has become very popular among patients after massive weight loss (MWL). Massive weight loss itself is associated with negative consequences for the body and creates new and unique dysfunctions1 that can severely affect the patient’s quality of life. The abdominal apron is generally the greatest and the first disturbance faced by the postbariatric patient. Redundant skin may become a medical problem if it leads to dermatitis, ulceration, infection, or difficulty with ambulation; these conditions are associated with significant hygiene problems. In some cases, excess skin is a cosmetic problem, and surgical removal of such skin is an elective procedure that is not covered by health insurance.2 In cases presenting with functional disability, panniculectomy may be the only body-contouring procedure covered by third-party payers.3 Surgical correction of these body deformities can significantly enhance patients’ physical and physiologic well-being. The treatments in body-contouring procedures include lipoplasty, excisional surgery, or a combination of the two procedures. Total abdominal liposuction performed with abdominoplasty allows for the preservation of lymphatic vessels below Scarpa’s fascia and eliminates the need for upper flap undermining.4,5


Although diet and exercise may be the first line of treatment, the severely obese patient has often reached a tipping point at which his or her immense size limits mobility and the potential for exercise. For these patients, the journey starts with bariatric surgery and usually ends with plastic surgery after 12 to 18 months. Ideally, the role of plastic surgery should be discussed with patients in the phase preceding bariatric surgery, so that they can understand what to expect from plastic surgery. Patients who seek body contouring following MWL have their own set of criteria.6


They need to be evaluated regarding their candidacy for a belt lipectomy instead of abdominoplasty. Although excess skin after bariatric surgery is seldom considered a medical complication, it is certainly a psychosocial complication that patients may not think about before surgery.7



Relevant Anatomy


The abdominal wall is embryonically derived in a segmental manner, and this is reflected in its blood supply and inner-vation. It becomes a definitive structure after the umbilical cord is separated. The musculature of the abdominal wall includes the paired rectus abdominis muscles, which meet in the midline at the linea alba. These muscles are enclosed by a fascial sheath. In the upper two thirds of the rectus fascia, the anterior sheath is formed by the external and internal oblique aponeurosis, and the posterior sheath is formed by the internal oblique and transversalis aponeurosis. In the lower third, the posterior sheath is absent, and all three apo-neurotic layers pass anterior to the rectus muscle, except the internal lamina of the transversus abdominis, the transversalis fascia, and the peritoneum, which pass posteriorly. The blood supply of the abdominal wall has connections between the deep superior and deep inferior epigastric systems with contributions from the superficial inferior epigastric vessels and the intercostal vessels.8 A clear understanding of the arterial supply of the abdominal wall is crucial to operative planning, especially when the patient’s history includes prior abdominal or chest wall surgeries. One area is fed anteriorly by the vertically oriented deep epigastric arcade. The lateral aspects of the abdominal wall (flanks) are fed by the six lateral intercostal and four lumbar arteries. The lower abdominal circulation is provided by the superficial epigastric, superficial external pudendal, and superficial circumflex iliac systems. A rich plexus between these systems allows collateral flow.


During abdominoplasty, the cutaneous blood supply is divided, with the abdominal flap circulation fully dependent on lateral intercostal and lumbar arteries mentioned above. A vertical midline incision can jeopardize flap circulation. The superficial fascial system (SFS), the connective tissue network that resides below the dermis, has been implicated as a pivotal structure in body-contouring procedures. Surgical repair of the SFS has been shown to increase wound strength and decrease seroma formation. Lockwood is credited with the concept that repair of the SFS results in a stable scar that heals without migration. Incorporation of this layer into the body-sculpting operation has the potential of enhancing outcomes, as the surgeon is dealing with large surface areas of tissue that need to be approximated under significant tension. The nerve supply to the abdominal wall is via intercostal nerves VIII to XII. These nerves pass between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles,9 penetrating through the muscle as perforating anterior cutaneous nerves supply sensation to the skin of the abdomen in a stepwise fashion. During abdominoplasty, these perforating nerves are necessarily severed as the anterior abdominal skin and subcutaneous fat are raised from the underlying fascial plane. Sensibility is often decreased after abdominoplasty, particularly in the torso and suprapubic region. The loss of sensation is usually transient, with pain, temperature, and pressure sensation returning after an average of 6 to 7 months.10 The skin of the abdomen is usually quite loose, except at certain points of adherence, namely the anterosuperior iliac crests and the linea alba. The subcutaneous tissue is divided by two layers of fascia, the superficial fascia (Camper) and the deep fascia (Scarpa), which is continuous with the fascia lata of the thigh. With aging and pregnancy, fat tends to be distributed into the lower infraumbilical abdomen.

Fig. 15.1 Design of the skin incision and the presumed ellipse of abdominal skin to be removed
Fig. 15.2 Intraoperative view after liposuction of the complete abdomen and creation of a central tunnel with a triangular shape (apex to the xiphoid). Note the preservation of the perforating vessels in the suctioned areas.


History


The history of abdominoplasty, one of the most commonly performed plastic surgical procedures, is associated with that of bariatric surgery. Along with bariatric surgery, abdominoplasty has undergone significant evolution over the past several decades. The first attempts to correct excess abdominal skin and fat occurred in the late 1800s. The first reports of aponeurotic suturing occurred in the 1960s. Since the beginning, abdominoplasty incisions have echoed prevailing fashion trends. Adjustments in technique were necessary to achieve a tailor-made abdominoplasty that concealed scars under clothing, which continues to be a challenge in the MWL population.11 Although aponeurotic suturing in the midline was noted to reduce anterior projection of the abdominal wall, it did little to reduce the diameter of the waist. With the addition of liposuction, Matarasso12 expanded the use of abdominal contour surgery, followed by other authors.4,1316 In 1995, Lockwood17 described the high lateral tension abdominoplasty. Its key features include limited direct undermining, increased lateral skin resection with high tension wound closure along lateral limbs, two-layer SFS repair, and liberal use of adjunctive liposuction in the upper abdomen and the lateral and posterior trunk.


The use of progressive tension sutures can reduce local complication rates, including hematoma and seroma formation, flap necrosis, and hypertrophic scars.18 High superior tension abdominoplasty can reduce complications and the postoperative recovery, shorten operating time, and, with precise preoperative markings, place the scar in the correct position.1921 The mechanism of action of progressive tension sutures has been hypothesized as being compartmentalization of the fluid collection under the flap, which facilitates absorption.22



Indications


Our technique after MWL is indicated both in patients who present with skin redundancy only and in those who also complain of fat accumulation in the abdominal region.


In the former, liposuction is used only to perform a less traumatic undermining of the skin, with preservation of most of the perforating vessels and nerves. This maneuver is started from the central area of the abdomen, where skin and fat undermining is complete and performed with a Bovie cautery or scalpel, to the more lateral parts. In the case of patients who present with both skin and fat excess, more aggressive liposuction undermines the abdominal flap and reduces its thickness.

Fig. 15.3 Abdominal skin resection can be done (A) in a tailored way or (B) in a predefined way as in a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap elevation.
Fig. 15.4 Plication of the rectus fascia along the midline to address any musculofascial laxity.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 12, 2020 | Posted by in General Surgery | Comments Off on 15 Lipoabdominoplasty with Progressive Tension Sutures

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access