1 Three-dimensional Imaging for Emerging Technologies in Body Contouring



Isabel Robinson and Pierre Saadeh


Abstract


Initially adopted by craniofacial surgeons, three-dimensional imaging technology has more recently expanded into the fields of breast and body contouring. These systems create value pre-, intra-, and postoperatively by facilitating a more objective conversation with patients on preoperative expectations, enabling the creation of personalized cutting guides and implants, and allowing surgeons to more accurately quantify their results over time. While currently limited by cost and technical training requirements, as these technologies continue to develop they are likely to become an indispensable resource in the body contouring surgeon’s armamentarium.




1 Three-dimensional Imaging for Emerging Technologies in Body Contouring



Key Points




  • Summary of 3D imaging technologies’ technical points, applications, and points for consideration (▶Table 1.1).

























Table 1.1 Summary of 3D imaging technologies’ technical points, applications, and points for consideration

Patient selection


Indications/contraindications: all standard body contouring indications/contraindications apply, specifics vary by procedure(s)


Technique


The patient is photographed (still or in motion depending on the desired information), and a digital image is created. Depending on the system, anatomical landmarks are automatically or manually identified. Landmarks can then be manipulated to alter the image, giving an idea of potential surgical outcomes. Postoperative images can be taken and compared to preoperative images to give quantitative data on volumetric changes


Clinical applications


Preoperatively, imaging can be used to consult the patient on the aesthetic outcomes of potential procedures. Intraoperatively, it can be used to create 3D-printed models, implants, and cutting guides. Postoperatively, it can be used to quantitatively assess outcomes and to monitor changes over time


Combinations with other technologies


Imaging complements all soft tissue manipulations, particularly for face and breast as relatively extensive literature exists in these two areas. Principles can be applied to other body areas but will likely require greater manual effort on the part of the user as fewer automated analysis systems exist for these areas


Pros




  • Quantitative, objective assessment



  • Automatic landmark identification and volume analysis more efficient than manual calculation



  • Increased patient trust and satisfaction


Cons




  • Cost ($20,000–$60,000)



  • Technological training required



  • Current software mainly focused on face/breast



1.1 Introduction


3D imaging is a powerful emerging technology in the field of body contouring. Body contouring inherently deals with three-dimensional changes and relationships, and yet preoperative planning and postoperative assessment has historically relied on two-dimensional representations. With the advent of 3D imaging, volumetric analysis can be performed and visualized with an accuracy that 2D photographs are incapable of meeting. This enables surgeons to give patients a better understanding of their likely surgical outcomes and to ensure mutual understanding about surgical goals. It also provides a quantitative means of assessing outcomes and volume-based changes over time in order to further refine technique and optimize surgical outcomes. Newly-developing 3D imaging technologies are advancing the understanding of microvasculature 1 and allowing surgeons and patients to experiment with various aesthetic outcomes using virtual simulations in real time. 2 3D imaging revolutionizes the way surgeons are able to visualize patient data and holds great potential for both clinical and research applications.



1.2 History of 3D Imaging in Plastic Surgery


The history of 3D imaging begins with stereophotogrammetry, the practice of estimating three-dimensional coordinates on an object’s surface by using photographs of the object taken from different positions. The technique affords a more nuanced understanding of three-dimensional and volumetric relationships than traditional two-dimensional photography. Mannsbach originally suggested applying stereophotogrammetry to the fields of medicine and dentistry in 1922, and in 1939 Zeller first published a contour map of a man’s face using a stereocamera. 3 It was not until 1944, however, that stereophotogrammetry was applied in a clinical setting, with Thalmann using the technique to diagnose orthodontic pathology. 3


Since then many variations upon the technique have developed, most notably computer-assisted systems that greatly improve the speed and depth of analysis. Such advances include optical flow tracking, which incorporates time into three-dimensional analyses to give the user the ability to track soft tissue changes immediately during motion or longitudinally after surgery. One such iteration is 3D speckle tracking, in which white makeup is first applied to the patient’s face or other surfaces of interest. Black makeup is then dotted over the white, creating a speckled appearance that a computer can detect. In a craniofacial case, the patient then makes a series of facial expressions that displace the speckles while the computer tracks and analyzes these changes, producing a report on the patient’s facial expressivity. Newer technologies, such as the Di4D optical flow tracking software (Glasgow, Scotland), are able to track facial motion by digitally creating a mesh over a patient’s face and tracing changes to it over time, thereby obviating the need for makeup application. One of the newest developments in the field of three-dimensional medical imaging is ultrahigh sensitive optical microangiography (UHS-OMAG), with which Doppler monitoring of blood cell movement is able to produce 3D maps of capillary microvasculature in the skin after five seconds of scanning. 1


What follows will be a review of current clinical applications of three-dimensional imaging technologies like optical flow tracking and UHS-OMAG to the practice of body contouring. Applications to breast and facial surgery will be emphasized as the majority of existent research on 3D imaging technologies comes from these subspecialties. However, many of the principles discussed apply equally to most body contouring procedures.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jan 25, 2021 | Posted by in Aesthetic plastic surgery | Comments Off on 1 Three-dimensional Imaging for Emerging Technologies in Body Contouring

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access