Wound Management and Bandaging

Chapter 25
Wound Management and Bandaging


Bernadette Byrne


Department of Tissue viability, Kings College Hospital, UK







OVERVIEW



  • The physiology of normal wound healing can be optimised by the correct selection and application of appropriate dressings and/or bandage systems.
  • Individualised holistic patient assessment including skin and wound is important to select the type of dressings required and treat any underlying causes.
  • Understanding the properties and functions of different dressing categories is a pre-requisite to enable the practitioner to make the most appropriate evidence-based choice for each wound type.
  • Correct application of bandages is essential to ensure they are at the correct tension to prevent slippage or cause damage around bony prominences.
  • Patient choice and involvement in wound care lead to improved concordance essential to successful wound healing.
  • A multidisciplinary approach is essential between all the healthcare practitioners caring for the patient’s wound/skin.
  • The patient’s quality of life can be significantly improved by optimal wound care.





Introduction


Effective wound management relies heavily upon the selection of an appropriate dressing and an in-depth understanding of the normal physiology of wound healing. Wound dressings have developed in scientific standing over the years and the complexity of their action is reflected in the vast amount spent on their development to provide the optimum evidence-based wound care; however, there are very few large randomised studies to support their use. Without effective wound assessment there is a risk of selecting an inappropriate product which can lead to delayed wound healing. This chapter provides a practical approach to wound management rather than a detailed look at the physiology of the wound healing process.


Wounds


A wound is a cut or break in continuity of any tissue caused by injury or operation—a break in the skin that may consist of a tear, incision, cut, erosion, puncture or ulcer where the top layer of the skin is breached; if this occurs, tissues are vulnerable to fluid, blood and heat loss, allowing potential invasion of micro-organisms or foreign materials into the skin and possible loss of function.


Since the introduction of modern wound dressings such as Granuflex in 1982 and subsequently Kaltostat in 1986 (Convatec), the science of wound healing has progressed rapidly and considerable advances have been made in the development of new products to enhance wound healing; this has led to explosion of wound care products available both in hospital and on FP10 prescription. While a greater choice of dressing products is beneficial to both the patient and the practitioner, it can lead to confusion on which dressings to select for each individual wound as different wound dressings often have specific indications for use.


When assessing any wound, there are multiple factors that need to be taken into consideration in addition to the possible underlying aetiology; decisions on which product to apply are based on a full holistic assessment including short- and long-term aims of treatment, patients’ diagnosis and prognosis, availability of the product and the cost.


Principles of local wound management include achieving haemostasis, correcting underlying causes, reducing bioburdon (micro-organisms), removing devitalised tissue if present by debridement (Figure 25.1), maintaining moisture balance and protecting the surrounding skin.

c25f001

Figure 25.1 Deep necrotic wound secondary to calciphylaxis being debrided. Source: Grey et al., 2010. Reprinted with kind permission of Wounds UK.


Wound bed preparation: Achieving a healthy wound bed is a pre-requisite to the use of many advanced wound care products. The aim of wound bed preparation is to optimise the wound healing environment by removing barriers, that is, necrotic tissue, slough, exudate and bioburdon. Wound bed preparation is the management of the wound to accelerate endogenous healing or to facilitate the effectiveness of other therapeutic measures.


The acronym TIME indicates the principles of wound bed preparation.



  1. T—Tissue, non-viable or deficient
  2. I—Infection or inflammation
  3. M—Moisture imbalance
  4. E—Edge, epidermal margin, non-advancing or undermining.

(From Schultz et al., 2003)


Wound types


In order to manage wounds optimally, they are classified into four different types according to the appearance of the wound bed and surrounding tissues, as illustrated by the wound healing continuum below.


The wound healing continuum is represented by the tissues in the wound and is colour-based (from Grey et al., 2013) (Figure 25.2).



  1. Necrotic wounds. Dead (ischaemic) tissue is usually black, brown or dark tan and is covered with devitalised epidermis; a black wound indicates the presence of eschar.
  2. Sloughy wounds. These are mostly yellow because of the accumulation of cellular debris, fibrin, serous exudate, leucocytes and bacteria on the wound surface. Yellow fibrous tissue that adheres to the wound bed and cannot be removed by irrigation is known as slough.
  3. Granulating wounds are characteristically bright red with a highly vascular nodular, irregular granular appearance. This is a combination of new blood vessel growth, connective tissue or dermal cells.
  4. Epithelialising wounds. Cells migrate from the wound edges to start the process of re-epithelialisation/epidermal re-growth, which is seen as pink translucent tissue in the wound bed (Table 25.1).
c25f002

Figure 25.2 Wound healing continuum. Grey et al. (2010). Reprinted with kind permission of Wounds UK.


Wound-related factors to be considered in selecting an ideal dressing



  • Type/aetiology of wound
  • Size of the wound
  • Location of the wound
  • Stage of healing
  • Tissue involved
  • Amount, colour and viscosity of exudates
  • Wound odour
  • Condition of the surrounding skin
  • Patient’s general health and environment
  • Duration of the wound (acute or chronic)
  • Long- and short-term aims of treatment

Key factors affecting wound healing



  • Overall health and past medical history
  • Cardiovascular status/circulatory disorders
  • Disease processes, for example, diabetes and cancer
  • Extremes of age (very young/old)
  • Psychological factors, for example, stress and anxiety, sleep disturbances
  • Malnutrition
  • Dehydration
  • Smoking
  • Drug therapy
  • Poor wound management
  • Surgical site infections
  • Patients prognosis

Table 25.1 Wound types and suitable dressings.






































Wound type Wound picture Characteristics Examples of suitable dressings
Necrotic wounds image Black, dry, eschar devitalised tissue, but can present as wet necrosis/gangrene.
Aims of dressing:
Rehydrate eschar to encourage autolytic debridement if appropriate (not diabetic foot wounds).
Manage exudate/actively debride if wet necrosis/infected.
Hydrogels (non-diabetic)
Hydrocolloids (non-diabetic)
Sharp debridement by competent practitioner only (TVN or Podiatrist)
Surgical debridement
Sloughy image Can range from dry to highly exuding.
Characterised by fibrous sloughy tissue, yellowish in colour.
Aims of dressing:
Remove slough, encourage and facilitate a clean wound bed for the formation of granulation tissue.
Hydrogels
Alginates
Hydrofibre
Hydrocolloids
Larvae
Packing or ribbon forms of dressing required for cavity wounds
Granulating image Clean, low to medium exudate, bright red wound bed with granular, moist, nodular and uneven appearance.
Aim of dressing:
To protect and encourage granulation tissue formation.
Promote a moist wound healing environment.
Alginates
Hydrofibre
Hydrocolloids
Foams
Alginogels
Hydrogels
Epithelialising image Clean, superficial, low to medium exudate, pink in colour, can have white/translucent margins.
Aim of dressing:
Protection to allow further epithelialisation/maturation to occur.
Low and non-adherent dressings knitted viscose
Paraffin gauze
Silicone based products
Film dressings
Infected wounds image Painful to touch, malodorous, greenish/yellow in appearance, friable granulation tissue (delicate, easily damaged) often have increased levels of exudates. Suitable dressings are
Silver-impregnated dressings:
Silver alginates, hydrofibre, foams
Iodine based dressings
Honey
PHMBs
Larvae
Exuding wounds image Exuding wounds can appear anywhere on the wound healing continuum, however increased exudate is often associated with wound infection.
They often have per-wound skin that is shiny and white (wet and macerated).
Aims of dressing:
Effective exudate management.
Skin care to encourage healing.
Suitable dressings include
Alginates
Hydrofibre
Foams
Super absorbants
Also require barrier protection of per-wound skin:
50:50
Epaderm
Double base

TVN, tissue viability nurse.


Check for sensitivities prior to application.


Regardless of type, any wound may be additionally infected or colonised by micro-organisms. If organisms proliferate within the wound an infection may develop, causing a host reaction; this is characterised by pain, oedema, erythema, odour, increased or purulent exudate, abscess formation and local heat.


Dressings


The process of dressing selection is determined and influenced by a variety of factors. These include patient-focused issues and the types of dressings available.


Principles for selecting an ideal dressing



  • To provide a moist environment to promote healing
  • To absorb excess wound exudate
  • To allow gaseous exchange
  • To protect the wound from pathogenic organisms
  • To protect the wound from trauma and contamination
  • To minimise and contain odour
  • To provide a constant wound interface temperature
  • To be non-adherent and easily removed
  • To be non-toxic, non-allergenic and non-sensitising
  • To reduce pain
  • To promote autolytic debridement
  • To protect the surrounding skin
  • To cause minimum distress and discomfort during dressing change
  • To improve the quality of life
  • To be cosmetically acceptable to the patient
  • Conformability of dressing
  • To be cost effective and available in hospitals and the community

Dressings


Modern dressings are described as either passive or interactive, depending on their composition and structure.


Passive dressings



  • are applied to protect the wound
  • are designed not to stick to the wound bed
  • are mostly used for surgical, clean healing and superficial wounds.

Interactive dressings



  • actively interact with the wound surface (in order to promote an environment that maximises healing).

Types of wound dressings


Both passive and interactive dressings are subdivided into several categories, as seen in Figure 25.3.

c25f003

Figure 25.3 Wound dressing categories.


Non- or low adherent dressings


These are used for superficial, lightly exuding wounds (Figure 25.4). Their major function is to maintain a moist wound bed and allow the exudate to pass through to a secondary dressing and reduce trauma at dressing change. Newer silicone-based dressings are the most effective but tend to be more expensive.

c25f004

Figure 25.4 Non-adherent dressings.


Examples include the following:



  • Knitted viscose dressings with an open structure to facilitate the free passage of exudates (e.g. N/A & N/A ultra).
  • Perforated film absorbent dressings. The film is perforated to allow the exudate into the absorbent layer (e.g. Melolin®, Release®).
  • Silicone dressings. These are made of a conformable silicone-covered mesh which gently adheres to the wound and surrounding skin but are designed to reduce pain and trauma on removal; the hydrophobic soft silicone layer feels sticky to touch but does not adhere to the wound bed. It is non-absorbent and therefore a secondary absorbent dressing is required, but self-adhesive dressing with foam backing is also available. (e.g. Mepitel®, Adaptic, Silflex). Uses include donor sites, burns, epidermolysis bullosa (EB) patients and under topical negative pressure (TNP).
  • Paraffin tulle dressings consisting of an open-weave cotton or viscose and cotton-mix dressing impregnated in yellow or white soft paraffin (e.g. Jelonet®).

Film dressings


These consist of a thin film of polyurethane, permeable to water vapour and oxygen yet impermeable to water and micro-organisms, allowing gaseous exchange and reducing risk of bacterial contamination (Figure 25.5). Films are flexible and therefore suitable for difficult anatomical sites such as across joints. They can be used on superficial wounds, donor sites, post-operative wounds and as a secondary dressing for other products. These dressings are not recommended for deep, infected or exuding wounds. Removal of these dressings can be traumatic to the surrounding skin and it is therefore recommended to follow the manufacturers’ instructions and remove by the ‘horizontal stretch’ technique.

c25f005

Figure 25.5 Film dressings allow wound monitoring.


Examples include Opsite®, Tegaderm®, Bioclusive® and C-View®.


Hydrogel dressings


These consist of insoluble polymers which are hydrophilic and can absorb excess fluid or produce a moist environment at the wound surface (Figure 25.6). They can be used on dry, sloughy and necrotic wounds which allow rehydration of devitalised tissue and facilitate autolysis. Hydrogel dressings may be suitable for pressure ulcers, leg ulcers and surgical wounds; however, they should not be used for wounds producing high levels of exudate, where gangrene is present, or on diabetic foot ulcers. Hydrogel dressings also come in a sheet format and usually require a secondary dressing to keep them in place. These dressings need to be changed every 1–3 days. Examples include Actiform cool (sheet), Intrasite gel®, Intrasite conformable, Granugel®, Purilon and Nugel®.

c25f006

Figure 25.6

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 7, 2016 | Posted by in Dermatology | Comments Off on Wound Management and Bandaging

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access