Modern wound care for the poor: a randomized clinical trial comparing the vacuum system with conventional saline-soaked gauze dressings

Perez D, Bramkamp M, Exe C, et al (Hôpital Albert Schweitzer, Deschapelles, Haiti; Univ Hosp of Zurich, Switzerland) Am J Surg 199:14-20, 2010^§

Abstract

Background

A clinical randomized trial was performed to determine whether a simple homemade wound vacuum-dressing system (HM-VAC) is a feasible alternative to the use of conventional saline-soaked gauze dressings (WET) for the treatment of complex wounds in a resource-poor hospital.

Methods

Forty patients were analyzed to compare the HM-VAC and the WET dressings. The HM-VAC was assembled with tools available in most operating room worldwide. The primary outcome measure was the time of complete wound healing. Additionally, the costs of both methods were calculated.

Results

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Related posts:

randomized placebo-controlled trial of oxybutynin for the initial treatment of palmar and axillary hyperhidrosis Invasive Component Separation Results in Fewer Wound-Healing Complications than Open Component Separation for Large Ventral Hernia Repairs to Basics: Understanding the Terminology Associated With Light- and Energy-Based Technology fifteen-year experience of buttock contouring with combination of silicone implant, liposuction, and structural fat grafting sural perforator plus island flap: A modification of the medial sural perforator island flap for the reconstruction of postburn knee flexion contractures using burned calf skin and Tribulations with the Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Join