Secondary Rhinoplasty

46. Secondary Rhinoplasty


Richard Y. Ha, Lily Daniali, Cecilia Alejandra Garcia de Mitchell, Bahman Guyuron


INDICATIONS


POSTOPERATIVE FUNCTIONAL OR AESTHETIC DEFORMITY


Poor preoperative diagnosis


Failure to properly identify the structural problem resulting in functional compromise or aesthetic imbalance1


Inappropriate surgical planning or inadequate technique resulting in distortion of supporting osteocartilaginous framework


Problematic wound healing


Prolonged edema, ecchymosis, unfavorable scarring, obstructive or restrictive webbing, and occasionally hyperesthesia


PATIENT DISSATISFACTION


Undesirable functional or aesthetic outcome


Breathing difficulties and asymmetry are most common complaints.2


Inadequate preoperative counseling with regard to postoperative course, recovery time, desired and expected outcomes


Unrealistic expectations


Even with appropriate preoperative counseling, some patients continue to have unrealistic expectations


If not identified, these patients will be dissatisfied with their results regardless of the outcome.3,4


Postoperative deformity and patient dissatisfaction do not always correlate.


MOST COMMON DEFORMITIES OR PROBLEMS


Displacement/deviation of anatomic structures


Underresection by overly cautious surgeons


Overresection by overly aggressive surgeons5


Contour irregularities secondary to disruption of framework or unfavorable scarring


Prosthetic complications including infection, extrusion, inflammation, palpability, or transillumination (e.g., in dorsal silicone implants)


SURGICAL OBSTACLES6


Scarring of the subcutaneous tissues resulting in adherence to the underlying cartilaginous framework and destruction of tissue planes


Osteocartilaginous distortion or damage requiring reconstruction for structural support


Limited sources of cartilage grafts secondary to previous harvest of septal or conchal cartilage


CHANGES IN SKIN THICKNESS


Thin skin in some patients, which is less forgiving of minor underlying deformities


Prone to graft extrusion


Thick skin secondary to prolonged edema or scarring, which is less malleable and will not show desired framework changes as easily


Compromised vascularity secondary to previous surgical incisions and scarring


SURGICAL APPROACHES


ENDONASAL/CLOSED APPROACH


Pros


Decreased postoperative edema and scarring because limited dissection


Indications


Isolated deformities that can be addressed independent of the overall framework


Severely scarred nose where vascularity is a significant concern


EXTERNAL/OPEN APPROACH


This is the preferred approach for secondary rhinoplasty.7


Pros


Provides maximal exposure for adequate visualization


Facilitates complete release of tissue attachments causing anatomic distortion


Facilitates precise diagnosis and correction of deformities under direct visualization


Allows direct hemostatic control


Cons


Increased postoperative edema


Placement of transcolumellar incision


If original scar is well hidden but at incorrect level of columella, ignore original scar and place second incision at appropriate location


PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING


This is supplementary to the evaluation performed for a primary rhinoplasty, as presented in Chapter 45.


MEDICAL HISTORY


All previous nasal surgeries


Obtain previous operative reports if possible to determine graft availability, presence of prosthetic material or hardware, and previous techniques or findings that may assist in evaluation and operative planning.


History of trauma


Allergies


Cocaine/drug use


Screen for body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) (see Chapter 1)


Mental disorder involving a distorted body image, defined as:


Preoccupation with an imagined physical deformity OR


Vastly exaggerated concern of a minimal physical deformity


In 50% of patients with BDD, the nose is the primary complaint.8,9


BDD occurs in secondary rhinoplasty consultations in about 12% of cases, and in 2%-7% of all primary cosmetic patient consultations.8,9


Plastic surgeons are often the first to encounter these patients; thus recognizing and addressing it are essential.


A psychiatry consult may be warranted.


CAUTION: Avoid reoperation in BDD patients.10



SENIOR AUTHOR TIP: It is crucial to make sure that the secondary rhinoplasty patient’s concerns are real and match what the surgeon sees in severity. Exaggerated concerns should be carefully assessed by asking the patient to rate the flaw on the scale of 1-10, 10 being the best. Disparity in rating beyond 3-4 points should be considered a red flag.


COMPREHENSIVE NASAL AND FACIAL ANALYSIS


As described in the primary rhinoplasty chapter (Chapter 45), with special attention to common secondary deformities:


Bony pyramid


Excessive narrowing or convexity


Secondary to inadequate alignment or splinting of bones after osteotomy


Irregularities/stairstep deformity


Because of unplanned fracture sites


Rocker deformity (Fig. 46-1)



image

Fig. 46-1 Rocker deformity.


Occurs from inadequate placement of medial osteotomy, resulting in a wide upper dorsum


Midvault/upper lateral cartilages


Asymmetry of dorsal aesthetic lines


Nasal deviation


Inverted-V deformity (Fig. 46-2)



image

Fig. 46-2 Inverted-V deformity.


Midvault collapse leading to visibility of the the caudal edge of the nasal bones


This edge or line forms an upside down or inverted V.


Results from overresection of the dorsal midvault and upper lateral cartilages or inadequate infracture of the nasal bones


Saddle nose deformity (Fig. 46-3)



image

Fig. 46-3 Saddle nose deformity.


Excessively depressed upper nasal and midvault regions secondary to overresection


Supratip area


Polly beak deformity11


Convexity located just cephalad to the nasal tip


Secondary to overresection of the noncartilaginous caudal dorsum, underresection of the cartilaginous nasal dorsum and/or excessive scar formation in the dead space of the supratip area (Fig. 46-4)



image

Fig. 46-4 Polly beak deformity. Postoperative profile view of a secondary rhinoplasty patient with a supratip deformity caused by both an underprojected tip and an underresected caudal dorsum.


Tip complex12,13


Bulbous or boxy tip deformity


Pinched nasal tip deformity


Results from collapsed alar rims after disruption of lateral crural support


Loss of tip projection


From loss of tip support: Disruption of lower lateral cartilages (LLCs) and/or intercartilaginous attachments


Overrotation


Obtuse nasolabial angle


Asymmetry of tip-defining points


Secondary to inadequate placement of tip sutures or unrecognized damage to cartilage


Infratip lobule


Excessive infratip lobule projection


From excessive length and buckling of middle crus or crura


Lack of definition


Middle crus too wide


Deformity may result from prominent caudal septum or obtuse septal angle.14


Alae


Widened base


Alar rim collapse resulting in impaired external valve competency (Fig. 46-5)



image

Fig. 46-5 Alar rim collapse. Alar rim collapse caused by lack of lower lateral cartilage support.


Loss of LLC integrity and failure to reconstruct framework at initial surgery


Clinically assessed by palpating preoperative resistance of alae to gentle compressive force


Weakness is useful for diagnosing either established or predisposition to alar collapse.


Alar retraction


Alar flaring


Widened base


Notching


Secondary to inadequate placement or closure of previous incisions, scarring, and failure to place supporting grafts


Columella


Retraction, deviation, and/or inferior bowing


Intranasal


Airway occlusion most common underdiagnosed and untreated deformity in secondary rhinoplasty


Breathing difficulties most common complaint in patients presenting for revision2


Septum


Deviation


Graft availability


Turbinates


Internal nasal valve competency


May have been medialized by osteotomy15



SENIOR AUTHOR TIP: History of septoplasty does not necessarily mean depletion of the cartilage in the septum. A thorough examination may result in discovery of sufficient cartilage in the septum.


FORMULATE TREATMENT PLAN


Surgical approach


Augmentation or resection


Correction of distortion/displacement/irregularities


Need for removal of prosthetic materials


Source and quantity of structural graft materials


Rib cartilage


Ear cartilage


Septal cartilage


Iliac/calvarial bone


Alloplastic materials (controversial)


Delay any secondary surgery for at least 12 months.


Ensure maximal resolution of edema, scar maturation, and improved vascularity.


May consider early intervention within first 12 days postoperatively only if gross abnormality present or significant technical error noted16


Share preoperative analysis and treatment plan with patients.


Use visual imagery: Photos, computer imaging, or onlay tracing


Increases communication to establish realistic expectations and surgical goals


INFORMED CONSENT


NONSURGICAL TREATMENT


Observation


Injectable fillers for mild augmentation or contour irregularities


SURGICAL TREATMENT


Open versus closed rhinoplasty


TECHNIQUE


Reconstruction of the nasal osteocartilaginous framework is the foundation for successful secondary rhinoplasty.


Keep in mind skin quality, graft availability, effects of scarring, and vascularity.



SENIOR AUTHOR TIP: The most common reason for a residual caudal deviation after the primary and even secondary septorhinoplasty is failure to eliminate the redundant overlapping dislodged portion of the caudal anterior septum to allow repositioning the septum in the midline.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 3, 2020 | Posted by in Aesthetic plastic surgery | Comments Off on Secondary Rhinoplasty

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access