20 Lip augmentation
Summary and Key Features
• The lips are a defining feature of the face; enhancement of lip volume and structure through the use of fillers is a commonly requested cosmetic procedure
• Ethnic variations and aesthetic preferences should be considered in the evaluation and treatment planning for lip augmentation
• Hyaluronic acids are commonly used filler products for lip rejuvenation; their safety profile coupled with their potential reversibility using hyaluronidase makes them a frequent choice for treatment of the lips. Semipermanent and permanent fillers such as calcium hydroxylapatite, poly-L-lactic acid, silicone, and polymethylmethacrylate have higher incidences of nodule and granuloma formation and should therefore be avoided in the lips
• Injection of filler product into the rolled border of the lip will produce definition of the lip. Injection of filler product along the wet–dry junction of the lip will augment the volume of the lips
• Bruising and swelling are common, temporary side effects of lip augmentation. Small-volume injections can minimize these effects. Touch-up treatments 1–2 weeks later may be necessary
• Multimodality treatments including soft tissue fillers, botulinum toxins, and resurfacing techniques can be incorporated into treatment of the lips and perioral area
The aging process on the lips
Multiple assessment scales have been developed to quantify these changes. A numeric CKC scale (Table 20.1) was developed to aid in the initial assessment of patients, as well as their response to rejuvenation. Additionally, multiple lip-specific photographic scales have been developed in clinical studies. A recently presented abstract by Werschler et al developed, validated, and utilized a Lip Fullness Scale. Another recently presented abstract by Cohen et al validated the Perioral Lines at Rest (POL), Perioral Lines at Maximum Contraction (POLM), and Oral Commissure Severity (OCS) scales. Previous studies by Carruthers et al and Rossi et al have determined and validated photonumeric grading systems for assessing lip fullness, volume, and thickness (Figs 20.1 and 20.2). These scales may be of benefit in the initial assessment of patients and their clinical improvement following lip augmentation.
![image](/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/B9781455727827000209_f020-001-9781455727827.jpg)
Figure 20.1 Photonumeric grading scale for assessing lip volume and thickness.
(Reprinted with permission from Rossi AB et al 2011 Development and validation of a photonumeric grading scale for assessing lip volume and thickness. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 25(5):523-531.)
![image](/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/B9781455727827000209_f020-002-9781455727827.jpg)
Figure 20.2 Validated lip fullness grading scale.
Reprinted with permission from Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Hardas B, et al 2008 A validated lip fullness grading scale. Dermatologic Surgery 34(suppl 2):S161-S166.
When done well, lip augmentation and rejuvenation can dramatically address many of these changes associated with aging lips to both replace the volume loss and redefine the lip structure. In a 2009 study by Werschler et al, after treatment with a hyaluronic acid (HA) filler (Juvéderm® Ultra®, Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA), multiple features of the lips were improved, including: (1) proportional lip size relative to the face, (2) proportional upper and lower central lip fullness, (3) sharp, well-defined vermilion borders, (4) distinct Cupid’s bow peaks and a well-defined philtrum, and (5) oral commissure fullness to support the lateral aspect of the lip. In the study, the investigators rated these five attributes as ‘adequate’ in only 32–48% of subjects prior to augmentation; after the augmentation was performed, the attributes were scored as ‘adequate’ in 80–90% of subjects.