24 Fecal Incontinence
EPIDEMIOLOGY
The inability to control feces is a devastating problem. Many people find this problem socially incapacitating and stay home, thus minimizing social contact to avoid an embarrassing situation. To estimate the number of people afflicted with fecal incontinence is difficult because many do not mention the problem to their caregivers. In a study by Johanson and Lafferty (1996), only about a third of patients discussed their incontinence with their physicians. Others incorrectly describe their symptoms and may refer to their incontinence as “diarrhea,” making it difficult for the physician to understand the problem without careful questioning. Thus, estimates probably grossly underreport the prevalence, which ranges from 0.1% to 18%. Studies in the United States found an overall prevalence of 18.4%, with a higher prevalence of 26% in patients who visited a gastroenterologist. Definitions of fecal incontinence also vary from report to report, making comparisons difficult.
ETIOLOGY
Defecation is a complex process that involves an intricate interaction between anal function and sensation, rectal compliance, stool consistency, stool volume, colonic transit, and mental alertness. An alteration in any of these can lead to incontinence. Box 24-1 lists some common causes of fecal incontinence.
Childbirth is increasingly being recognized as commonly injuring the mother’s sphincter complex. In a study by Sultan et al. (1993), women were evaluated before and after childbirth, with interviews, anal physiology testing, and anal endosonography. They found that 35% of primiparous women and 44% of multiparous women had sphincter defects after delivery. The IAS was injured more often than the external sphincter—sometimes when no breach occurred in the perineal skin. A strong correlation was found between sphincter defects and the development of bowel symptoms, although only about a third of women with sphincter defects developed bowel symptoms. Incontinence may not appear until decades after the obstetric injury, so it remains to be seen how many of these women develop incontinence later in life. In the past, these patients, particularly women with delayed symptoms years after childbirth injury, were labeled with idiopathic incontinence. However, with the advent of more sophisticated evaluation techniques, defects in the sphincter complex have been found.
Fecal incontinence also appears to be associated with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. In one study by Jackson et al. (1997), a third of women presenting to a urogynecologist for urinary incontinence also had fecal incontinence, and 7% of women with isolated pelvic organ prolapse had fecal incontinence. In another study by Tetzscher et al. (1996), 18% of women who had a previous obstetric anal sphincter disruption had both urinary and fecal incontinence. Besides obstetric injury, other causes thought to possibly contribute to both conditions include chronic constipation with straining at stool, aging, and relaxation of pelvic support.
EVALUATION
Scoring Scales for Fecal Incontinence
Qualifying fecal incontinence has been difficult because many scoring systems have been introduced. A validated questionnaire for measuring quality of life, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL), was reported in 2000 by Rockwood et al. and has 29 items that relate to four scales: lifestyle, coping/behavior, depression/self-perception, and embarrassment. In the same year, Reilly et al. (2000) developed a questionnaire to assess epidemiology of fecal incontinence and associated risk factors. This assessed general bowel habits, assessed presence and severity of fecal incontinence, measured symptoms related to pelvic floor dysfunction, and assessed risk factors for fecal incontinence. The FIQL is currently used routinely to assess quality of life during patient’s follow-up after any mode of treatment.
The American Society of Colon and Rectum Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) is a severity rating score and consists of questions that rate continence to gas, mucus, solid, and liquid stool. The FISI is commonly used in conjunction with the FIQL as a tool to measure the efficacy of treatment. The other popular tool is the Wexner score that uses lifestyle alterations and wearing of a pad, in addition to incontinence to solids, liquid, and gas. In this score, zero is a score for perfect continence and 20 for complete incontinence. See Chapter 39 for further discussion of these outcome questionnaires.
Diagnostic Testing
ANORECTAL PHYSIOLOGY TESTING
Many methods are available to assess anorectal physiology. Manometry, electromyography (EMG), rectal compliance, and pudendal nerve studies may all be helpful. Manometry provides quantitative information regarding the resting and squeeze pressures of the sphincter muscles. The resting pressures reflect the constant tone of the internal sphincter muscles. The squeeze pressures reflect the pressure generated by the external sphincter muscle. The length of the anal canal can be determined by the measured distance of these pressures. A shortened anal canal length may reflect injury to the muscle. Positive rectoanal inhibitory reflex rules out Hirschsprung’s disease (see Chapter 25).
DEFECOGRAPHY
Defecography is indicated if rectal prolapse or internal intussusception (occult prolapse) is suspected. See Chapter 27 for a more thorough discussion.
ENDORECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY (ERUS)
Endosonography is recognized as a valuable tool in the assessment of fecal incontinence. A probe is inserted into the rectum and withdrawn through the anal canal allows for a 360-degree visualization of the internal and external anal sphincters. Particularly in patients with surgical or obstetric injury who did not develop incontinence until many years (even decades) after the insult, endosonography allows visualization of defects in the sphincter muscle, which, in turn, can lead to surgical correction. In the past, many of these patients would have been diagnosed with idiopathic incontinence, and surgical repair may have not been considered (Fig. 24-1