Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions1
Classification
Immunologically Mediated ACDR (see Table 23-1). It should be noted, however, that classification of immunologically mediated ACDR according to the Gell and Coombs classification is an oversimplification because in most reactions both cellular and humoral immune reactions are involved. Nonimmunologic reactions are summarized in Table 23-2.
TABLE 23-1 IMMUNOLOGICALLY MEDIATED ADVERSE CUTANEOUS DRUG REACTIONS*
TABLE 23-2 NONIMMUNOLOGIC DRUG REACTIONS
Guidelines for Assessment of Possible ACDRs
• Exclude alternative causes, especially infections, in that many infections (especially viral) are difficult to distinguish clinically from the adverse effects of drugs used to treat infections.
• Examine interval between introduction of a drug and onset of the reaction.
• Note any improvement after drug withdrawal.
• Determine whether similar reactions have been associated with the same compound.
• Note any reaction on readministration of the drug.
Findings Indicating Possible Life-Threatening ACDR
• Skin pain
• Confluent erythema
• Facial edema or central facial involvement
• Palmar/plantar painful erythema
• Concomitant erosive mucous membrane involvement
• Blisters of epidermal detachment
• Positive Nikolsky sign
• Mucous membrane erosions
• Urticaria
• Swelling of the tongue
• High fever (temperature >40°C)
• Enlarged lymph nodes
• Arthralgia
• Shortness of breath, wheezing, hypotension
• Palpable purpura
• Skin necrosis
Clinical Types of Adverse Drug Reactions
ACDRs can be exanthematous and can manifest as urticaria/angioedema, anaphylaxis, and anaphylactoid reactions, or serum sickness; they can mimic other dermatoses; they can present as cutaneous necrosis, pigmentation, alopecia, hypertrichosis; and they can induce nail changes. An overview is presented in Tables 23-3 and 23-4.
TABLE 23-3 TYPES OF CLINICAL ACDRs
TABLE 23-4 ACDR MIMICRY OF OTHER DERMATOSES
Figure 23-1. Exanthematous drug eruption: ampiciMin Symmetrically arranged, brightly erythematous macules and papules, discrete in some areas, and confluent in others, on the trunk and the extremities.
Reactions to Specific Drugs (Selected)
Allopurinol. Incidence: 5%. Begins on face, spreads rapidly to all areas; may occur in photodistribution. Onset: 2–3 weeks after initiation of therapy. Associated findings: facial edema; systemic vasculitis, especially involving kidneys. Rash may fade in spite of continued administration.
Ampicillin, Amoxicillin. In up to 100% of patients with EBV or CMV mononucleosis syndrome. Increased incidence of EDR to penicillins in patients taking allopurinol. Ten percent cross-react with cephalosporins.
Barbiturates. Site: face, trunk. Onset: few days after initiation of therapy. Cross-reactivity with other barbiturates: not universal.
Benzodiazepines. Rare. Onset: few days after initiation of therapy. Rechallenge: frequently rash does not occur.
Carbamazepine. Morphology: diffuse erythema; severe erythroderma may follow. Site: begins on face, spreads rapidly to all areas; may occur in photodistribution. Onset: 2 weeks after initiation of therapy. Associated findings: facial edema.
Gold Salts. Incidence: 10–20% of patients; dose-related. Morphology: diffuse erythema; exfoliative dermatitis, lichenoid, hemorrhagic, bullous, or pityriasis rosea-like eruptions may follow.
Hydantoin Derivatives. Macular → confluent erythema. Begins on face, spreads to trunk and extremities. Onset: 2 weeks after initiation of therapy. Associated findings: fever, peripheral eosinophilia; facial edema; lymphadenopathy (can mimic lymphoma histologically).
Isoniazid. May evolve to exfoliative dermatitis. Associated findings: fever and hepatitis.
Phenothiazines. Begins on face, spreads to trunk (mainly back), and extremities. Onset: between second and third weeks after initiation of therapy. Associated findings: periorbital edema. Rechallenge: rash may not occur. Cross-reactivity: common.
Sulfonamides. Occurs in up to 50–60% of HIV/AIDS-infected patients (trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole). Patients sensitized to one sulfa-based drug may cross-react with another sulfa drug in 20%.
Figure 23-2. Pustular drug eruption: acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) Multiple tiny nonfollicular pustules against the background of diffuse erythema that first appeared in the large folds and then covered the entire trunk and the face.
Figure 23-3. Pustular drug eruption: AGEP Multiple sterile pustules surrounded by fiery-red erythema in a 58-year-old female who had fever and leukocytosis. In contrast to the disseminated pustules in Fig. 23-2, here the pustules show a tendency for grouping and confluence. Differential diagnosis of von Zumbusch pustular psoriasis (compare with Fig. 3-13).
Figure 23-4. Pustular drug eruption: erlotinib This pustular eruption occurred in a patient who had received an anti-EGR monoclonal antibody for cancer of the colon localized to face. Differential diagnosis to acne and rosacea.