Aesthetic

Face, Neck, and Brow

A Systematic Review of Comparison of Efficacy and Complication Rates among Face-Lift Techniques

Chang S, Pusic A, Rohrich RJ (Univ of Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dallas; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, NY) Plast Reconstr Surg 127:423-433, 2011^§

Abstract

Background

The ideal face lift has the longest efficacy, the fewest complications, and ultimately, the highest patient satisfaction. With so many different techniques, there exists a need to make this comparison and to establish which approaches may work best in various groups. To date, there has been no systematic review to study the efficacy and complication rates among different face-lift techniques. This study aims to make this comparison.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Related posts:

comparison of Ringer’s lactate and acetate solutions and resuscitative effects on splanchnic dysoxia in patients with extensive burns Impacting Employment After Burn Injury Closure Materials for Upper Lid Blepharoplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Fascia Preservation during Abdominoplasty: A Prospective Study Decision Making and Perception in Patients Undergoing Cosmetic Breast Augmentation Monitoring of Free Flaps in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Comparison of 398 Flaps Using Clinical Monitoring, Microdialysis, and the Implantable Doppler Probe

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Join