Posterior and Posteroinferior Approaches

CHAPTER 14 Posterior and Posteroinferior Approaches






The posterior or Moore Southern approach is the most popular technique for total hip arthroplasty. It has some marked advantages over other approaches to the hip. Less extensive tissue dissection is needed with this approach than with others, and this approach does not violate the abductor mechanism. Therefore, patients have a lower incidence of postoperative Trendelenburg gait. The exposure also provides good access to the acetabulum and the femur and can be extended either proximally to address pelvic dissociation with plating of the posterior column, or distally to address femoral fracture. The posterior approach is associated with a lower incidence of heterotopic bone formation. It has a historically higher dislocation rate compared with the anterolateral approach, but this is not the case when an enhanced posterior repair is used.1


The posteroinferior approach for hip resurfacing is a modification of the posterior approach and is therefore easy to learn and perform by a surgeon familiar with that approach. The surgeon should keep in mind, however, that resurfacing hip arthroplasty is not just another hip arthroplasty but in fact a completely different procedure. Unlike traditional hip arthroplasty, there is no working space created by resection of the femoral head. Therefore, increased exposure and greater mobilization of the femoral head is required. The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom has recognized this and has recommended specialist training for all surgeons undertaking the procedure for the first time.


After trying for seven years to reduce the problems encountered with hip resurfacing, we advocate the posteroinferior approach. The approach has all the benefits of our standard posterior approach: it preserves all cutaneous nerves by passing between the known angiodermatomes2; preserves the iliotibial band and the trochanteric bursa; and avoids any dissection of the gluteus medius and minimus, which improves abductor function and reduces the risk of heterotopic bone formation.





POSTERIOR APPROACH



Patient Positioning


We begin by positioning the patient in the lateral decubitus position and stabilizing the pelvis with a well-padded hip brace system. We favor a central sacral pad and two anterior pads placed against the iliac crests and above the anterior superior iliac spines. It is critical that a gap exists between the hip support and the thigh when the hip is flexed to 90 degrees. This allows the dislocated femur to be retracted into this gap.


A pillow is placed between the legs to prevent excessive adduction, and the hip is placed in 45 degrees of flexion with the knee flexed to 90 degrees. (We try to keep the knee flexed when possible during the procedure to minimize tension on the sciatic nerve.) The tip of the greater trochanter is then marked (Fig. 14-1).



The skin incision runs parallel to the posterior border of the femur and curves posteriorly at the tip of the greater trochanter to run parallel to the fibers of the gluteus maximus. As a rule of thumb, about one third of the incision should usually be proximal to the tip of the greater trochanter, although this depends on the femoral anatomy, as already discussed. The length of the incision on a slim patient with moderate muscle mass and a flexible hip can be routinely less than 10 cm with practice.3


The gluteus maximus is split along its fibers, and the posterior part of the iliotibial band is divided in line with the femoral shaft to just beyond the distal end of the skin incision.




External Rotators


The posterior fat tissue and bursa are divided with scissors, taking care to leave a layer of tissue that can be closed over the short external rotators (Fig. 14-2). The hip is now brought into internal rotation by resting the foot on a well-padded Mayo table. Scissors are used to define the posterior border of the gluteus medius, where a Deaver or Langenbeck retractor is inserted (Fig. 14-3). The retractor exposes the piriformis muscle that can be confirmed by palpation, because it is a characteristic cylindrical tendon.




The junction of the gluteus minimus and piriformis is defined with diathermy. A Cobb retractor is passed between the short external rotators and the capsule, as well as between the gluteus minimus and the capsule, to define the plane for dissection (Fig. 14-4). The hip is held in extension and less internal rotation while this is done to prevent damage to the muscles through excessive stretching. The hip is now placed in internal rotation so that the piriformis and conjoined tendon (obturator internus and gemelli) can be divided. A long diathermy is bent to allow the tendons to be cut at their insertions (Fig. 14-5). Near the insertion, the piriformis tendon forms a crescent shaped cross-section that grips the circular conjoined tendon. If two cylindrical tendons are released, it is likely that they have been divided far from their insertion.




Two Kessler sutures are placed in the external rotator tendons,4 clips are placed on them, and they are retracted posteriorly to protect the sciatic nerve. We recommend 2 Vicryl or 2 Polysorb sutures, because they are strong but will not linger and potentially irritate the bursa.


The Deaver retractor is now repositioned under the gluteus minimus to maximize exposure of the capsule. Diathermy is used to cut the capsule, starting at the 1-o’clock position, moving along the line of the femoral neck to its insertion, and then along its insertion around the posterior aspect of the femoral neck. The aim is to leave as much capsule as possible to aid its reattachment.


Mar 10, 2016 | Posted by in Reconstructive surgery | Comments Off on Posterior and Posteroinferior Approaches

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access