Comparison of Splinting Versus Nonsplinting in the Treatment of Pediatric Trigger Finger

Shiozawa R, Uchiyama S, Sugimoto Y, et al (Shinshu Univ School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan; Hata General Hosp, Matsumoto, Japan; Yodakubo Hosp, Japan; et al) J Hand Surg 37A:1211-1216, 2012^§

Abstract

Purpose

Because pediatric trigger finger is much less common than pediatric trigger thumb, there is no consensus on the efficacy of splinting, owing to both the rarity of the condition and a lack of natural history and comparative therapeutic data. We performed the present retrospective study on 47 fingers to compare pediatric trigger finger treatment by splinting and nonsplinting.

Methods

We included 24 children with a total of 47 trigger fingers. Affected fingers included 4 index, 28 middle, 11 ring, and 4 little fingers. Patient age at initial examination ranged from 1 month to 9 years (mean, 2 y). We observed 24 fingers treated with a static splint and 23 fingers treated without it. The time from initial examination to follow-up ranged from 2 to 18 years.

Results

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Share this:

• X
• Facebook

Related

Related posts:

of the Wrist and Associated Triangular Fibrocartilage Lesions: A Prospective Study in Arthroscopically-treated Patients of Sensory Reeducation Programs on Functional Hand Sensibility after Median and Ulnar Repair: A Systematic Review Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Loop Suture Materials in a 6-Strand Flexor Tendon Repair Technique Results of the Darrach Procedure: A Long-Term Outcome Study Longitudinal Follow-up of Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair of the Brief International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Core Set for Hand Conditions

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Join