Medical Management of Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia


Treatment modality

Perianal condyloma

Perianal AIN grades 2/3

Advantages

Disadvantages

Applied by clinician

Liquid nitrogen

x

x

Inexpensive

Pain

Office-based

May lead to scarring

Multiple office visits may be needed

More effective for limited disease

85 % Trichloroacetic acid

x

xa

Inexpensive

Pain

Office-based

May lead to scarring

Multiple office visits may be needed

More effective for limited disease

Infrared coagulation

x

xa

Office-based

Pain

May be used to treat extensive disease

Bleeding

Relatively inexpensive

Infection

Electrocautery

x

x

May be office-based

Pain

Inexpensive

Bleeding

Infection

Laser

x

x

May be performed in some office settings

Pain

May be used to treat extensive disease

Bleeding

Infection

Cold scalpel excision

x

x

Used to treat extensive disease

Requires surgical setting

Pain

Bleeding

Infection

Applied by the patient

Podophyllotoxin

x
 
Patient-applied

Pain/irritation

Multiple office visits may be needed

Patients may miss small lesions

Sinecatechins

x
 
Patient-applied

Pain/irritation

Multiple office visits may be needed

Patients may miss small lesions

Imiquimod

x

xa

Patient-applied

Pain/irritation

Multiple office visits may be needed

Patients may miss small lesions

May be less effective in men than women

May be less effective in HIV-positive patients

5-Fluorouracil cream
    

aShown to be potentially effective in small, open-label trials or retrospective chart reviews




Table 17.2
Treatment of intra-anal condyloma and anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN)















































































































Treatment modality

Intra-anal condyloma

Intra-anal AIN grades 2–3

Advantages

Disadvantages

Applied by the clinician

Liquid nitrogen

x
 
Inexpensive

Pain

Office-based

May lead to scarring

Multiple office visits may be needed

More effective for limited disease

85 % Trichloroacetic acid

x

xa

Inexpensive

Pain

Office-based

May lead to scarring

Multiple office visits may be needed

More effective for limited disease

Infrared coagulation

xa

xa

Office-based

Pain

May be used to treat extensive disease

Bleeding Infection

Relatively inexpensive

Electrocautery

x

x

May be office-based

Pain

Inexpensive

Bleeding

Infection

Laser

x

x

May be performed in some office settings

Pain

May be used to treat extensive disease

Bleeding

Infection

Cold scalpel excision

x

x

Used to treat extensive disease

Requires surgical setting

Pain

Bleeding

Infection

Applied by the patient

Imiquimod

xa

xa

Patient-applied

Pain/irritation

Multiple office visits may be needed

Patients may miss small lesions

May be less effective in men than women

May be less effective in HIV-positive patients

5-Fluorouracil cream
       


aShown to be potentially effective in small, open-label trials or retrospective chart reviews


A139176_1_En_17_Fig1_HTML.gif


Fig. 17.1
Management algorithm for anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) grades 2/3


To treat limited perianal HGAIN at UCSF, we would start with 85 % trichloroacetic acid (TCA) [28] or liquid nitrogen. A combination of the two modalities may be helpful, with the lesions frozen first, followed by application of TCA. TCA is reapplied as needed up to four times at 2- to 3-week intervals, and if it is not successful, a different modality should be tried. If there is uncertainty about whether the disease has been cleared, the treatment areas should be biopsied. If available, some clinicians would use hyfrecation (low-power, high-frequency, alternating current electrical pulse therapy) in the office or IRC. Imiquimod cream is another modality that may be used if the patient knows where to apply it. Studies in Europe have shown some success with imiquimod for treatment of HGAIN [2931], but we have had relatively limited success with it at the UCSF Anal Neoplasia Clinic. HIV-positive patients may not respond as well to imiquimod as HIV-negative patients because the mechanism of action is immune-mediated through toll-like receptors. If the patient does not experience pain or inflammation with standard dosing regimens and has not experienced a therapeutic effect, some have increased the number of treatment days per week beyond the standard 3 days/week. Treatment should be discontinued if the patient is experiencing excessive discomfort, but mild discomfort may be a sign that the treatment is working. Treated areas should be biopsied to confirm a treatment response. Like other topical treatments, imiquimod has not specifically been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for this purpose.

Larger perianal HGAIN lesions usually require more aggressive approaches. IRC is growing in popularity because it can be performed in the office setting and does not create smoke or require a smoke evacuator. Large lesions that would in the past have required referral to surgery may be treated using this approach. Retrospective chart review studies and a multicenter phase I safety study indicate that the efficacy of IRC to treat individual HGAIN lesions is about 65 % within a year, with up to three treatments [32, 33]. The efficacy of laser or electrocautery for treatment of perianal HGAIN has not been reported.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 18, 2016 | Posted by in Reconstructive surgery | Comments Off on Medical Management of Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access