Treatment modality
Perianal condyloma
Perianal AIN grades 2/3
Advantages
Disadvantages
Applied by clinician
Liquid nitrogen
x
x
Inexpensive
Pain
Office-based
May lead to scarring
Multiple office visits may be needed
More effective for limited disease
85 % Trichloroacetic acid
x
xa
Inexpensive
Pain
Office-based
May lead to scarring
Multiple office visits may be needed
More effective for limited disease
Infrared coagulation
x
xa
Office-based
Pain
May be used to treat extensive disease
Bleeding
Relatively inexpensive
Infection
Electrocautery
x
x
May be office-based
Pain
Inexpensive
Bleeding
Infection
Laser
x
x
May be performed in some office settings
Pain
May be used to treat extensive disease
Bleeding
Infection
Cold scalpel excision
x
x
Used to treat extensive disease
Requires surgical setting
Pain
Bleeding
Infection
Applied by the patient
Podophyllotoxin
x
Patient-applied
Pain/irritation
Multiple office visits may be needed
Patients may miss small lesions
Sinecatechins
x
Patient-applied
Pain/irritation
Multiple office visits may be needed
Patients may miss small lesions
Imiquimod
x
xa
Patient-applied
Pain/irritation
Multiple office visits may be needed
Patients may miss small lesions
May be less effective in men than women
May be less effective in HIV-positive patients
5-Fluorouracil cream
Table 17.2
Treatment of intra-anal condyloma and anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN)
Treatment modality | Intra-anal condyloma | Intra-anal AIN grades 2–3 | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|---|
Applied by the clinician | ||||
Liquid nitrogen | x | Inexpensive | Pain | |
Office-based | May lead to scarring | |||
Multiple office visits may be needed | ||||
More effective for limited disease | ||||
85 % Trichloroacetic acid | x | xa | Inexpensive | Pain |
Office-based | May lead to scarring | |||
Multiple office visits may be needed | ||||
More effective for limited disease | ||||
Infrared coagulation | xa | xa | Office-based | Pain |
May be used to treat extensive disease | Bleeding Infection | |||
Relatively inexpensive | ||||
Electrocautery | x | x | May be office-based | Pain |
Inexpensive | Bleeding | |||
Infection | ||||
Laser | x | x | May be performed in some office settings | Pain |
May be used to treat extensive disease | Bleeding | |||
Infection | ||||
Cold scalpel excision | x | x | Used to treat extensive disease | Requires surgical setting |
Pain | ||||
Bleeding | ||||
Infection | ||||
Applied by the patient | ||||
Imiquimod | xa | xa | Patient-applied | Pain/irritation |
Multiple office visits may be needed | ||||
Patients may miss small lesions | ||||
May be less effective in men than women | ||||
May be less effective in HIV-positive patients | ||||
5-Fluorouracil cream |
Fig. 17.1
Management algorithm for anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) grades 2/3
To treat limited perianal HGAIN at UCSF, we would start with 85 % trichloroacetic acid (TCA) [28] or liquid nitrogen. A combination of the two modalities may be helpful, with the lesions frozen first, followed by application of TCA. TCA is reapplied as needed up to four times at 2- to 3-week intervals, and if it is not successful, a different modality should be tried. If there is uncertainty about whether the disease has been cleared, the treatment areas should be biopsied. If available, some clinicians would use hyfrecation (low-power, high-frequency, alternating current electrical pulse therapy) in the office or IRC. Imiquimod cream is another modality that may be used if the patient knows where to apply it. Studies in Europe have shown some success with imiquimod for treatment of HGAIN [29–31], but we have had relatively limited success with it at the UCSF Anal Neoplasia Clinic. HIV-positive patients may not respond as well to imiquimod as HIV-negative patients because the mechanism of action is immune-mediated through toll-like receptors. If the patient does not experience pain or inflammation with standard dosing regimens and has not experienced a therapeutic effect, some have increased the number of treatment days per week beyond the standard 3 days/week. Treatment should be discontinued if the patient is experiencing excessive discomfort, but mild discomfort may be a sign that the treatment is working. Treated areas should be biopsied to confirm a treatment response. Like other topical treatments, imiquimod has not specifically been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for this purpose.
Larger perianal HGAIN lesions usually require more aggressive approaches. IRC is growing in popularity because it can be performed in the office setting and does not create smoke or require a smoke evacuator. Large lesions that would in the past have required referral to surgery may be treated using this approach. Retrospective chart review studies and a multicenter phase I safety study indicate that the efficacy of IRC to treat individual HGAIN lesions is about 65 % within a year, with up to three treatments [32, 33]. The efficacy of laser or electrocautery for treatment of perianal HGAIN has not been reported.