Legal Consequences of Organ Transplantation Malpractice




© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016
Ralf J. Jox, Galia Assadi and Georg Marckmann (eds.)Organ Transplantation in Times of Donor ShortageInternational Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine5910.1007/978-3-319-16441-0_16


16. Legal Consequences of Organ Transplantation Malpractice



Ruth Rissing-van Saan 


(1)
Bochum, Germany

 



 

Ruth Rissing-van Saan





Ruth Rissing-van Saan J.D

was Supreme Judge for criminal law at the German Federal Court of Justice. After retiring in 2011, she took on a teaching position for criminal law and criminal proceedings at the Ruhr University in Bochum, Germany. Since November 2012, she has been the Director of the German Medical Association’s confidentiality and trust committee for transplantation medicine, which deals with questions and concerns that doctors, as well as patients and their relatives have regarding organ transplantation

 



16.1 Introduction


Transplantation medicine assumes and calls for the availability of donor organs. The Federal Republic of Germany as well as seven other countries1 have joined the Eurotransplant procuration organization in Leiden, Netherlands, in order to increase a chronically ill and waiting patient’s chances of receiving a donor organ, for him to receive the most immunologically suitable organ, or to transplant this organ as quickly as possible in acute life-threatening situations by implementing a collective donor-alert system.

As of January 1, 2013, there were 11,233 patients on the main Eurotransplant wait list, 6713 of which had just recently registered in 2012. In 2012, the small sum of 4042 procurable organs from deceased donors were actually transplanted.2 Thus, this process of procuring donor organs represents the distribution of scarce goods among numerous interested parties. This is an ethical and legal challenge, in that one donor organ has many chronically ill potential takers, who either receive a new chance at life through the allocation of this organ or whose body will fail in the case of non-consideration.

Medicine has always been confronted with the prevalent problematic of accommodating and saving numerous injured or ill individuals and the issue of sensibly distributing scarce resources for their treatment, whether that meant treating an endless number of injured individuals in times of war, helping hundreds of fatalities or injuries after natural catastrophes, or treating injuries after multiple-vehicle collisions on the highway or Autobahn. A generally valid set of rules, which can be used to justly and effectively distribute and implement the rather scarce medical and human resources that are needed to treat and save that many people, will always be necessary in order to find an acceptable solution to this recurring problematic. Thus, certain criteria have to be established that are the same for all affected individuals and define a priority plan of action that applies to everyone as is the case in the so-called Triage, which, among other things, goes by the principle of accommodation according to necessity, meaning: those that can wait must wait!


16.2 Legal Principles of Organ Transplantation in Germany


Organ transplantation is not immune from German law, but instead falls under the realm of the transplantation law (TPG), which has been in place since December 1, 19973 and which was significantly amended and has recently been reformed on July 12, 20124 and July 21, 20125. The law explicates the medical and legal premises for organ donation and controls the coordination of the extraction of the organ or tissue from the donor and the transfer of procurable organs to a specific recipient. It provides the basis for the organization of the organ transplantation, separating the responsibilities for the extraction of organs and tissues (§ 11 TPG), and getting the procurable, eligible organs to the potential recipient (§ 12 TPG). The institution that holds the position that is responsible for organretrieval and procurement preparation is reserved for a so-called coordinating center (§ 11 Paragraph 1 TPG), which in Germany is the German Organ Transplantation Foundation (German: Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation (DSO)). The procurement itself is carried out by a medical board, health insurance providers, and a financially and organizationally independent procurement committee within each respective hospital (§ 12 Paragraph 1 TPG). The procurement agency responsible for the German transplantation centers (German: Transplantationszentren (TPZ)) is, as mentioned above, Eurotransplant . They are responsible for procuring the organs to a proper recipient by following a set of rules, which adhere to contemporary findings in the medical sciences and which adequately ensure that the transplantation is for the benefit of the patient and takes the urgency of the need for an organ transplant into consideration (§ 12 Paragraph 3 Sentence 1 TPG).

The transplantation law requires that all the wait lists from various transplantation centers be treated as one collective wait list (§ 12 Paragraph 3 Sentence 2 TPG). The regulation stating that patients from each individual transplant center register collectively on one wait list guarantees that patients registered in Germany all have an equal chance of getting a donor organ. In general, standard procedure requires that an organ be allocated to one specific patient as opposed to allocating or offering it to a transplant center. However, there are exceptions (for example, resource allocations), which have certain guidelines regarding their prerequisites, which will not be elaborated on here.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 1, 2017 | Posted by in General Surgery | Comments Off on Legal Consequences of Organ Transplantation Malpractice

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access