Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy

CHAPTER 38 Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy


Anterior Approach






One of the greatest challenges in revision total hip arthroplasty is achieving adequate surgical exposure. Visualization is essential to minimizing the risks of intraoperative complications in order to ensure optimal results. Altered anatomy, extensive scarring, bony overgrowth, and deficient bone stock make revision total hip arthroplasty more challenging than primary total hip arthroplasty. Preoperative planning and preparation, including anticipation of potential complications, are paramount in attaining a successful outcome. Any surgical approach used in revision hip arthroplasty should have the potential to be expanded into a more extensile exposure should the need arise. An extensile exposure helps to minimize the trauma to the soft tissues, which often are already compromised in revision hip arthroplasty.


An extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) of the proximal femur provides direct visualization of the femoral canal and allows for improved exposure of the acetabulum. Therefore it is ideal for removal of a well-fixed femoral component as well as the safe removal of cement. Potential advantages of ETO include decreased risk of intraoperative fracture, decreased anesthetic time, improved exposure of the acetabulum for extensive reconstructive procedures, and the ability to correct deformities of the proximal femur.



INDICATIONS AND CONTRAINDICATIONS


ETO is often recommended for difficult femoral revisions, although it can be used to correct deformity in primary arthroplasty (Fig. 38-1). Ideally suited for removal of cementless or cemented femoral stems, including fractured stems, it also facilitates complete removal of distal cement, the cement plug, and bony pedestals (Fig. 38-2). Other common indications include deformity of the proximal femur, revision of femoral stems placed in significant varus, previous trochanteric osteotomy with bony overgrowth or trochanteric escape, and the need to perform extensive acetabular reconstructive surgery. Relative contraindications to ETO include revisions in which a cemented stem is to be implanted, as the cement may extrude into the osteotomy site. One must be cautious in using this approach with cortical bone that is thin secondary to osteolysis and therefore renders reattachment to the femur challenging.



Mar 10, 2016 | Posted by in Reconstructive surgery | Comments Off on Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access